DAR File No. 41546

This rule was published in the May 15, 2017, issue (Vol. 2017, No. 10) of the Utah State Bulletin.


Administrative Services, Purchasing and General Services

Rule R33-11

Form of Bonds

Notice of Proposed Rule

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 41546
Filed: 04/27/2017 03:52:28 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The purpose for the changes to this rule is to correct references to the Utah Procurement Code and administrative rules; to correct spelling errors; to clarify language; and to bring this rule into compliance with changes made to the Utah Procurement Code by H.B. 398 which was enacted in the 2017 General Session.

Summary of the rule or change:

The changes to this rule include modifications to correct typos; the removal of terms already defined in the Code; the clarification of verbiage to bring this rule into compliance with changes made to the Utah Procurement Code; and the removal of incorrect references to the administrative rules.

Statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

  • Title 63G, Chapter 6a

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are typographical or grammatical, and clarify the language of the rule and bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

local governments:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to local government as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are typographical or grammatical, and clarify the language of the rule and bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

small businesses:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are typographical or grammatical, and clarify the language of the rule and bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are typographical or grammatical, and clarify the language of the rule and bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

There are no anticipated costs to affected persons as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are typographical or grammatical, and clarify the language of the rule and bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

I believe that there is no potential for fiscal impact on businesses as a result of the changes to this rule. The changes are typographical or grammatical, and clarify the language of the rule and bring the rule into compliance with the statutory changes.

Jared Gardner, Procurement Policy Board Chair

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Office of Administrative Rules, or at:

Administrative Services
Purchasing and General Services
Room 3150 STATE OFFICE BLDG
450 N STATE ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-1201

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

  • Alan Bachman at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]
  • Kent Beers at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3143, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]
  • Jared Gardner at the above address, by phone at 385-646-4561, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]
  • Simone Rudas at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]
  • Fay Tan at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3524, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

06/14/2017

This rule may become effective on:

06/21/2017

Authorized by:

Kent Beers, Director

RULE TEXT

R33. Administrative Services, Purchasing and General Services.

R33-11. Form of Bonds.

R33-11-101. Definitions.

(1)(a) Whenever used in this Rule, the terms "bid", "bidder" and "bid security" apply to all procurements, including non-construction procurements, when the procurement documents, regardless of the procurement type, require securities and/or bonds.

(b) All definitions in the Utah Procurement Code shall apply to this Rule unless otherwise specified in this Rule. This administrative rule provides additional requirements and procedures and must be used in conjunction with the Procurement Code.

 

R33-11-201. Bid Security Requirements for Projects.

(1) Invitations for Bids and Requests for Proposals for construction contracts estimated to exceed $50,000 shall require the submission of bid bond in an amount equal to at least 5% of the bid, at the time the bid is submitted.

(2) Invitations for Bids and Requests for Proposals for other procurements may require the submission of a bid security, including specifications for the form and type of bid security, when the chief procurement officer or the head of a procurement unit with independent procurement authority determines it is in the best interest of the procurement unit

(3) If a person fails to include the required bid security, the bid shall be deemed nonresponsive and ineligible for consideration of award except as provided by Rule R33-6-108, Rule R33-6-109 or Rule R33-11-202[(2)].

(4) The chief procurement officer or head of a procurement unit with independent procurement authority may require an acceptable bid security on projects that are for amounts less than the standard amount set forth in Rule R33-11-201(1).

 

R33-11-202. Acceptable Bid Security Not Furnished.

(1) If acceptable bid security is not furnished, the bid shall be rejected as nonresponsive, unless the failure to comply is determined by the chief procurement officer or head of a procurement unit with independent procurement authority to be nonsubstantial. Failure to submit an acceptable bid security may be deemed nonsubstantial if:

(a) the bid security is submitted on a form other than the required bid bond form and the bid security meets all other requirements including being issued by a surety meeting the requirements of Rule R33-11-30[4]3(1)(b) and the contractor provides acceptable bid security by the close of business of the next succeeding business day after the procurement notified the contractor of the defective bid security; or

(b) only one bid is received, and there is not sufficient time to re-solicit; or

(c) the amount of the bid security submitted, though less than the amount required by the Invitation for Bids, is equal to or greater than the difference in the price stated in the next higher acceptable bid; or

(d) the bid security becomes inadequate as a result of the correction of a mistake in the bid or bid modification[in accordance with Rule R33-6-108 (Mistakes in Bids) or Rule R33-7-401 (Mistakes in Proposals) Rule R33-7-402 (Correction of Mistakes)], if the bidder increases the amount of guarantee to required limits within 48 hours after the bid opening.

(2) If the successful bidder fails or refuses to enter into the contract or furnish the additional bonds required under Rule R33-11-2, then the bidder's bid security may be forfeited.

 

R33-11-301. Performance Bonds for Construction Contracts.

A performance bond is required for all construction contracts in excess of $50,000, in the amount of 100% of the contract price. The performance bond shall be delivered by the contractor to the procurement unit within fourteen days of the contractor receiving notice of the award of the construction contract. If a contractor fails to deliver the required performance bond, the contractor's bid/offer shall be rejected, its bid security may be enforced, and award of the contract may be made to the [next lowest responsive and responsible bidder or highest ranked offeror]responsible bidder or offeror with the next lowest responsive bid or highest ranked offer.

 

R33-11-302. Surety or Performance Bonds for Non-construction Procurement Items.

(1) A surety or performance bond may be required on any non-construction contract [by]if the chief procurement officer or head of a procurement unit with independent procurement authority deems it necessary to guarantee the satisfactory completion of a contract, provided:

(a) The [Invitation for Bids or Request for Proposals ]solicitation contains a statement that a surety or performance bond is required in an amount:

(i) equal to the amount of the bid, [or ]offer, or other response;

(ii) equal to the project budget or estimated project cost, if the budget or estimated project cost is published in the solicitation documents;

(iii) equal to the previous contract cost, if the previous contract cost is published in the solicitation documents; or

(iv) The Invitation for Bids or Request for Proposals contains a statement that a surety or performance bond, in an amount less than the amounts contained in (a), is required; and

(b) The [Invitation for Bids or Request for Proposals]solicitation contains a detailed description of the work to be performed for which the surety or performance bond is required.

(2) Surety or Performance Bonds should not be used to unreasonably eliminate competition or be of such unreasonable value as to eliminate competition.

 

R33-11-303. Payment Bonds.

(1) A payment bond is required for all construction contracts in excess of $50,000, in the amount of 100% of the contract price. If a contractor fails to deliver the required payment bond, the contractor's bid or offer shall be rejected, its bid security may be enforced, and award of the contract shall be made to the [next lowest responsive and responsible bidder or highest ranked offeror]responsible bidder or offeror with the next lowest responsive bid or highest ranked offer.

For executive branch procurement units:

(a) Bid Bonds, Payment Bonds and Performance Bonds submitted by vendors to executive branch procurement units must be from sureties meeting the requirements of Rule R33-11-30[4]3(1)(b) and must be on the required bond forms;

(b) Surety firm requirements. All surety firms must be authorized to do business in the State of Utah and be listed in the U.S. Department of the Treasury Circular 570, Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Securities on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies for an amount not less than the amount of the bond to be issued.

([1]2) The chief procurement officer, or head of a procurement unit with independent procurement authority, may waive any bonding requirement if it is determined in writing by the chief procurement officer or head of a procurement unit with independent procurement authority that:

(a) bonds cannot reasonably be obtained for the work involved;

(b) the cost of the bond exceeds the risk to the procurement unit; or

(c) bonds are not necessary to protect the interests of the procurement unit.

([2]3) If the conducting procurement unit fails to obtain a payment bond it [may ]shall be subject Utah Code Title 14, Chapter 1.

 

KEY: bid security, performance bonds, payment bonds, procurement procedures

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [July 8, 2014]2017

Notice of Continuation: July 8, 2014

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63G-6a


Additional Information

More information about a Notice of Proposed Rule is available online.

The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull_pdf/2017/b20170515.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.

Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([example]). Text to be added is underlined (example).  Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.

For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Alan Bachman at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]; Kent Beers at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3143, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]; Jared Gardner at the above address, by phone at 385-646-4561, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]; Simone Rudas at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3240, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]; Fay Tan at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3524, by FAX at , or by Internet E-mail at [email protected].  For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Office of Administrative Rules.