File No. 33440

This rule was published in the April 1, 2010, issue (Vol. 2010, No. 7) of the Utah State Bulletin.


Education, Administration

Rule R277-114

Corrective Action and Withdrawal or Reduction of Program Funds

Notice of Proposed Rule

(New Rule)

DAR File No.: 33440
Filed: 03/09/2010 01:45:17 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The purpose of this new rule is to provide procedures for public education program monitoring by Utah State Office of Education staff and corrective action for noncompliance with identified program requirements, program accountability standards, and financial propriety.

Summary of the rule or change:

This new rule provides definitions and Utah State Office of Education responsibilities for monitoring programs and program funds for which the Utah State Board of Education has responsibility.

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

  • Subsection 53A-1-401(3)

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget. Utah State Office of Education program monitors may devote additional time monitoring programs and program funds but additional responsibilities will be managed by existing staff within existing budgets.

local governments:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to local government. There may be additional time required of school districts/charter schools responding to Utah State Office of Education requests for information, but the additional time should be minimal and will be managed by existing school district/charter school staff within existing budgets.

small businesses:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses. Small businesses receiving funding from the state may need to provide information as requested by the Utah State Office of Education which may result in additional staff responsibilities. Small businesses should be able to manage any added requirements with existing staff.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

There are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. Individuals receiving program funding from the state may be requested to provide information by the Utah State Office of Education which may result in minimal additional efforts by individuals.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

There may be speculative negligible costs for affected persons or entities to cooperative with program monitors and comply with this rule.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

I have reviewed this rule and I see no fiscal impact on businesses.

Larry K. Shumway, State Superintendent

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Education
Administration
250 E 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3272

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

  • Carol Lear at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

05/03/2010

This rule may become effective on:

05/10/2010

Authorized by:

Carol Lear, Director, School Law and Legislation

RULE TEXT

R277. Education, Administration.

R277-114. Corrective Action and Withdrawal or Reduction of Program Funds.

R277-114-1. Definitions.

A. "Board" means the Utah State Board of Education.

B. "Program" for purposes of the rule means a public education project or plan under the direction of the Board, with a specific goal or outcome for which public education funding is provided.

C. "Recipient" means a school district or school district program, charter school or charter school program, contractor, or any other entity that receives program funding as defined in this rule.

D. "State Superintendent" means the State Superintendent of Public Instruction as defined under Section 53A-1-301.

E. "USOE" means the Utah State Office of Education.

 

R277-114-2. Authority and Purpose.

A. This rule is authorized by Utah Constitution Article X, Section 3 which vests general control and supervision of public education in the Board and by Section 53A-1-401(3) which allows the Board to adopt rules in accordance with its responsibilities.

B. The purpose of the rule is to provide procedures for public education program monitoring and corrective action for noncompliance with identified program requirements, program accountability standards, and financial propriety.

 

R277-114-3. USOE Responsibilities.

A. USOE Directors, coordinators and program specialists shall act as designees of the State Superintendent and shall review compliance with program outcomes and financial propriety.

B. Designated program reviewers shall act and carry out responsibilities consistent with federal requirements, state law and administrative rules.

C. The following minimum procedures shall be followed prior to reducing or withholding funds from a recipient:

(1) The USOE, with assistance from directors, coordinators and program specialists, shall draft and implement a consistent monitoring procedure that includes standards for both recipient program outcomes and financial compliance. This monitoring program shall be communicated to the recipient regularly, and proper documentation of monitoring and compliance procedures conducted by USOE staff shall be maintained at the USOE.

(2) Recipients that do not demonstrate satisfactory outcomes, demonstrate noncompliance with program requirements or allowable program expenditures, or those that do not comply with requests to provide accurate and complete program or financial information enabling determination of compliance may be placed on corrective action.

(3) All courses of action should be discussed with the USOE deputy/associate superintendent who supervises the program, prior to placing recipients on a corrective action plan as follows:

(a) Corrective action plans shall clearly outline all areas of noncompliance and establish a reasonable time frame for the recipient to correct identified issues.

(b) Notification and a copy of the corrective action plan shall be communicated in writing to a program administrator as well as the superintendent/CEO and business administrator of the school district or school district program, charter school or charter school program, contractor, other recipient in question, the USOE deputy/associate superintendent over the program, the USOE internal auditor, and the State Superintendent.

(4) Directors, coordinators and program specialists shall follow up with the recipient to clarify questions and assist the recipient in establishing appropriate corrective measures to further compliance.

(5) If a recipient does not respond or does not satisfy the requirements of the corrective action plan by established deadline(s), the program director, coordinator, or supervisor shall notify the Internal Auditor, who will notify the State Superintendent.

(6) Verification of noncompliance and contact with the recipient to discuss and investigate the issues addressed in the corrective action plan shall be left to the discretion of the State Superintendent, Board Audit Committee and Internal Auditor.

(7) The Board shall determine if and at what level funding for programs may be withheld or terminated by the State Superintendent and when the Board should withhold or terminate a program or validate the State Superintendent's recommendation for withholding or termination of funding.

 

KEY: programs, noncompliance, corrective action

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2010

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: Art X Sec 3; 53A-1-401(3)

 


Additional Information

The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2010/b20100401.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.

Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets (e.g., [example]). Text to be added is underlined (e.g., example).  Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.

For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Carol Lear at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at carol.lear@schools.utah.gov.