File No. 35665

This rule was published in the February 1, 2012, issue (Vol. 2012, No. 3) of the Utah State Bulletin.


Administrative Services, Purchasing and General Services

Rule R33-4

Specifications

Notice of Proposed Rule

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 35665
Filed: 01/12/2012 05:40:02 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

H.B. 476 (2011 General Session) directs that rules be drafted governing the procurement, management, and control of any and all technology to be procured by the state.

Summary of the rule or change:

This amendment adds "technology" and "new technology" (as defined in Rule R33-1, in this issue) to the list of items for which specifications must be drafted. (DAR NOTE: The proposed amendment to Rule R33-1 in under DAR No. 35664 in this issue, February 1, 2012, of the Bulletin.)

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

  • Title 63G, Chapter 6

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

Requiring that specifications be drafted prior to the acquisition of technology or new technology may result in some added costs in staff time for acquiring agencies. Estimating how much the cost may be is prohibitively difficult in the aggregate; this would require determining how many agencies currently do not draft specifications that would now be required to do so; it would also require estimating how many technology acquisitions will occur in the future, an estimate for which there is not sufficient data. Conversely, the drafting of specifications may facilitate technology acquisition, resulting in cost savings.

local governments:

Requiring that specifications be drafted prior to the acquisition of technology or new technology may result in some added costs in staff time for acquiring agencies. Estimating how much the cost may be is prohibitively difficult in the aggregate; this would require determining how many agencies currently do not draft specifications that would now be required to do so; it would also require estimating how many technology acquisitions will occur in the future, an estimate for which there is not sufficient data. Conversely, the drafting of specifications may facilitate technology acquisition, resulting in cost savings.

small businesses:

Small businesses who provide technology to acquiring agencies may benefit from the specifications. The specifications should enable them to provide technology that is best-suited to the acquiring agencies' needs. Estimating the benefit is prohibitively difficult as it would require predicting, without sufficient data, agencies' future technology needs.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

This rule deals exclusively with technology acquisition on the part of state agencies and political subdivisions subject to the Procurement Code. No other persons are affected.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

Requiring that specifications be drafted prior to the acquisition of technology or new technology may result in some added costs in staff time for acquiring agencies. Estimating how much the cost may be is prohibitively difficult; this would require determining how many agencies currently do not draft specifications that would now be required to do so; it would also require estimating how many technology acquisitions will occur in the future, an estimate for which there is not sufficient data.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

I foresee the potential for greater efficiencies in government through the ability of government entities being able to modify existing contracts for technology-related enhancements, provided the ability to modify was contained in the original solicitation, thereby reducing procurement-related costs to vendors. Potential state contractors will have the opportunity to pilot their technology and technology-related goods and services without a lengthy competitive process.

Kimberly K. Hood, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Administrative Services
Purchasing and General Services
Room 3150 STATE OFFICE BLDG
450 N STATE ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-1201

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

  • Paul Mash at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet E-mail at pmash@utah.gov

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

03/02/2012

This rule may become effective on:

03/09/2012

Authorized by:

Kent Beers, Director

RULE TEXT

R33. Administrative Services, Purchasing and General Services.

R33-4. Specifications.

R33-4-1. General Provisions.

4-101 General Purpose and Policies.

(1) Purpose. Specifications shall be drafted with the objective of clearly describing the purchasing agency's requirements and of encouraging competition. The purpose of a specification is to serve as a basis for obtaining a supply, service, or construction item, or technology adequate and suitable for the purchasing agency's needs in a cost effective manner, taking into account, to the extent practicable, the costs of ownership and operation as well as initial acquisition costs.

(2) Use of Functional or Performance Descriptions. Specifications shall, to the extent practicable, emphasize functional or performance criteria while limiting design or other detailed physical descriptions to those necessary to meet the needs of the purchasing agency. To facilitate the use of the criteria, using agencies shall endeavor to include as a part of their purchase requisitions the principal functional or performance needs to be met. It is recognized, however, that the preference for use of functional or performance specifications is primarily applicable to the procurement of supplies and services. This preference is often not practicable in construction, apart from the procurement of supply-type items for a construction project.

(3) Preference for Commercially Available Products. It is the general policy that requirements be satisfied by standard commercial products whenever practicable.

4-102 Availability of Documents.

Except for testing and confidential data, specifications and any written determination or other document generated or used in the development of a specification shall be available for public inspection.

4-103 Emergency Authority.

In the event of an emergency, as determined by the procurement officer, the purchasing agency may procure by any reasonable means, with any available specifications, without regard to the provision of these rules.

4-104 Procedures for the Development of Specifications.

(1) Provisions of General Application.

(a) Application of Section. This section applies to all persons who may prepare a specification.

(b) Specification of Alternates May Be Included. A specification may provide alternate descriptions of supplies, services, or construction items where two or more design, functional, or performance criteria will satisfactorily meet the purchasing agency's requirements.

(c) Contractual Requirements Not to Be Included. To the extent feasible, a specification shall not include any solicitation or contract term or condition as a requirement for time or place of bid opening, time of delivery, payment, liquidated damages, or qualification of bidders.

(d) Use of Existing Specifications. If a specification for a common or general use item has been developed in accordance with subsection (2) (a) of this section or a qualified products list has been developed in accordance with subsection (2) (d) of this section for a particular supply, service, or construction item, or need, it shall be used unless the procurement officer makes a written determination that its use is not in the purchasing agency's best interest and that another specification shall be used.

(e) The procurement officer should provide for the periodic review of specifications to determine whether any existing specification needs revision, or a new specification is needed to reflect changes in:

(i) the state of the art;

(ii) the characteristics of the available supplies, services, or construction items, or technology;[ or]

(iii) needs of the using agency[.];

(iv) a new technology that the acquiring agency does not currently possess; or

(v) technology that is new or subject to future advancements during the course of any contract term.

(f) The procurement officer may allow others to prepare specifications for the purchasing agency's use in making procurements when there will be no substantial conflict of interest involved and it is otherwise in the best interests of the purchasing agency as determined by the procurement officer.

(2) Special Additional Procedures.

(a) Specifications for Common or General Use Items.

(i) Preparation and Utilization. A standard specification for common or general use shall, to the extent practicable, be prepared and utilized when a supply, service, or construction item is used in common by several using agencies or used repeatedly by one using agency, and the characteristics of the supply, service, or construction item as commercially produced or provided remain relatively stable while the frequency or volume of procurements is significant, or where the purchasing agency's recurring needs require uniquely designed or specially produced items.

(ii) Final Approval. Final approval of a proposed specification for a common or general use item shall be given only by the procurement officer.

(iii) Revisions and Cancellations. All revisions to or cancellations of specifications for common or general use items may be made upon approval of the procurement officer.

(b) Brand Name or Equal Specification.

(i) Brand name or equal specifications may be used when the procurement officer determines that a specification is in the purchasing agency's best interest.

(ii) Designation of Several Brands. Brand name or equal specification shall seek to designate as many different brands as are practicable as "or equal" references and shall state that products substantially equivalent to those designated will be considered for award.

(iii) Required Characteristics. Unless the procurement officer authorized to finally approve specifications determines that the essential characteristics of the brand names included in the specifications are commonly known in the industry or trade, brand name or equal specifications shall include a description of the particular design and functional or performance characteristics which are required.

(iv) Nonrestrictive Use of Brand Name or Equal Specifications. Where a brand name or equal specification is used in a solicitation, the solicitation shall contain explanatory language that the use of a brand name is for the purpose of designating the standard of quality, performance, and characteristics desired and is not intended to limit or restrict competition.

(c) Brand Name Specification.

(i) Use. Since use of a brand name specification is restrictive, a specification may be used when the procurement officer or designee makes a written determination. The determination may be in any form deemed acceptable to the chief procurement officer, as a purchase evaluation, or a statement of single source justification. The written statement must state specific reasons for use of the brand name specification.

(ii) Competition. The procurement officer shall seek to identify sources from which the designated brand name item or items can be obtained and shall solicit sources to achieve whatever degree of competition is practicable. If only one source can supply the requirement, the procurement shall be made under Section 63G-6-410 of the Utah Procurement Code.

(d) Qualified Products List.

(i) Use. A qualified products list may be developed with the approval of the Chief Procurement Officer, or the head of a purchasing or using agency authorized to develop qualified products lists, when testing or examination of the supplies or construction items prior to issuance of the solicitation is desirable or necessary in order to satisfy purchasing agency requirements.

(ii) Solicitation. When developing a qualified products list, a representative group of potential suppliers shall be solicited to submit products for testing and examination to determine acceptability for inclusion on a qualified products list. Any potential supplier, even though not solicited, may offer products for consideration in accordance with any schedule or procedure established for this purpose.

(iii) Testing and Confidential Data. Inclusion on a qualified products list shall be based on results of tests or examinations conducted in accordance with prior established requirements. Except as otherwise provided by law, trade secrets, test data, and similar information provided by the supplier will be kept confidential when requested in writing by the supplier. However, qualified products lists' test results shall be made public, but in a manner so as to protect the confidentiality of the identity of the competitors by, for example, using numerical designations.

 

KEY: government purchasing

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [1988]2012

Notice of Continuation: November 23, 2007

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63G-6

 


Additional Information

The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2012/b20120201.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.

Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets (e.g., [example]). Text to be added is underlined (e.g., example).  Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.

For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Paul Mash at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3138, by FAX at 801-538-3882, or by Internet E-mail at pmash@utah.gov.