DAR File No. 38677

This rule was published in the November 1, 2014, issue (Vol. 2014, No. 21) of the Utah State Bulletin.


Environmental Quality, Air Quality

Rule R307-344

Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings

Change in Proposed Rule

DAR File No.: 38677
Filed: 10/07/2014 09:58:12 AM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The EPA has indicated its intention to approve the area source coatings rules for the PM2.5 State Implementation Plan as reasonable available control technology (RACT), but not until: 1) they are amended to clarify that the amount of control removal specified in each rule is based on the entire system, and 2) the inspection and recordkeeping requirements for these systems are expanded. These changes were proposed to this and 13 other air quality area source rules, and a 30-day public comment period was held. During the public comment period, several inquiries were made regarding why the rules do not permit the use of exempt solvents for cleaning. The definition of "volatile organic compound (VOC)" found in Section R307-101-2 incorporates the definition of VOC found in 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1). This definition does permit the use of exempt compounds for cleaning; however, this allowance is not explicitly stated in this or the other proposed area source rules. The change to the proposed rule is to specify that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition.

Summary of the rule or change:

The change clarifies that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition. (DAR NOTE: The original proposed amendment upon which this change in proposed rule (CPR) was based was published in the August 1, 2014, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 19. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the CPR and the proposed amendment together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.)

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

  • Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a)

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.

local governments:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to local government.

small businesses:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

This change is to add language to clarify that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition. This change does not result in any additional compliance costs.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

This change is to add language to clarify that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition. This change will not have a fiscal impact on businesses.

Amanda Smith, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Environmental Quality
Air QualityRoom Fourth Floor
195 N 1950 W
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

  • Mark Berger at the above address, by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

This rule may become effective on:

12/01/2014

Authorized by:

Bryce Bird, Director

RULE TEXT

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality.

R307-344. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings.

R307-344-1. Purpose.

The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from roll, knife, and rotogravure coaters and drying ovens of paper, film, and foil coating operations.

 

R307-344-2. Applicability.

R307-344 applies to sources located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah and Weber counties that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of VOC, including related cleaning activities.

 

R307-344-3. Definitions.

The following additional definitions apply to R307-344:

"Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints such as lacquers or enamels. It is also used to refer to films applied to paper, plastics, or foil.

"Foil coating" means a coating applied in a web coating process on any foil substrate other than paper or fabric, including, but not limited to, typewriter ribbons, photographic film, magnetic tape, and metal foil gift wrap, but excluding coatings applied to packaging used exclusively for food and health care products for human and animal consumption.

"Knife coating" means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of drawing the substrate beneath a blade that spreads the coating evenly over the width of the substrate.

"Paper coating" means uniform distribution of coatings put on paper, film, foils and pressure sensitive tapes regardless of substrate. Related web coating processes on plastic film and decorative coatings on metal foil are included in this definition. Paper coating covers saturation operations as well as coating operations.

"Roll coating" means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means of hard rubber or steel rolls.

"Roll printing" means the application of words, designs and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or steel rolls each with only partial coverage.

"Rotogravure coating" means the application of a uniform layer of material across the entire width of the web to substrate by means of a roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate.

"Saturation" means dipping the web into a bath.

"Web" means a continuous sheet of substrate.

 

R307-344-4. VOC Content Limits.

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use an add-on control device as specified in R307-344-6.

 

TABLE 1


Paper, Film, and Foil Coating Limitations
(values in pounds VOC per pound of coating, minus water and
exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC as defined in 
R307-101-2), as applied)

COATING CATEGORY                         VOC EMISSION RATES

Paper, film and foil                            0.08

Pressure sensitive tape
and label                                       0.067

 

R307-344-5. Work Practices and Recordkeeping.

(1) Control techniques and work practices are to be implemented at all times to reduce VOC emissions. Control techniques and work practices include:

(a) Using tight fitting covers for open tanks;

(b) Using covered containers for solvent wiping cloths;

(c) Using collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for cleanup;

(d) Minimizing spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials;

(e) Conveying VOC-containing materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes;

(f) Cleaning spray guns in enclosed systems; and

(g) Using recycled solvents for cleaning.

(2) All sources subject to R307-344 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with R307-344-4 and R307-344-5.

(a) Records shall include, but not limited to, inventory and product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-344.

(b) These records shall be available to the director upon request.

(3) No person shall apply coatings unless these materials are applied with equipment operated according to the manufacturer's specifications, and by the use of one of the following methods:

(a) Flow coater;

(b) Roll coater;

(c) Dip coater;

(d) Foam coater;

(e) Die coater;

(f) Hand application methods;

(g) High-volume, low pressure (HVLP) spray; or

(h) Other application method capable of achieving at least 65% transfer efficiency, as certified by the manufacturer.

(4) All persons shall perform solvent cleaning operations with cleaning materials having VOC content (excluding water and solvents exempt from the definition of volatile organic compounds found in R307-101-2) of 0.21 pounds per gallon or less.

 

R307-344-6. Add-On Controls Systems Operations.

(1) The owner or operator shall install and maintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control system, provided that the emission control system is operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations in order to maintain at least 90% capture and control efficiency. Determination of overall capture and control efficiency shall be determined using EPA approved methods, as follows.

(a) The capture efficiency of a VOC emission control system's VOC collection device shall be determined according to EPA's "Guidelines for Determining Capture Efficiency," January 9, 1995 and 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M, Methods 204-204F, as applicable.

(b) The control efficiency of a VOC emission control system's VOC control device shall be determined using test methods in Appendices A-1, A-6, and A-7 to 40 CFR Part 60, for measuring flow rates, total gaseous organic concentrations, or emissions of exempt compounds, as applicable.

(c) An alternative test method may be substituted for the preceding test methods after review and approval by the EPA Administrator.

(2) The owner or operator of a control system shall provide documentation that the emission control system will attain the requirements of R307-344-6(1).

(3) The owner or operator shall maintain records of key system parameters necessary to ensure compliance with R307-344-6. Key system parameters may include, but are not limited to, temperature, pressure and flow rates. Operator inspection schedule, monitoring, recordkeeping, and key parameters shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, and as required to demonstrate operations are providing continuous emission reduction from the source during all periods that the operations cause emissions from the source.

(4) The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations.

 

KEY: VOC emission, paper coating, film coating, foil coating

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2014

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1)(a)

 


Additional Information

More information about a Notice of Change in Proposed Rule is available online.

The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2014/b20141101.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.

Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([example]). Text to be added is underlined (example).  Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.

For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Mark Berger at the above address, by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov.  For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Division of Administrative Rules.