DAR File No. 38684

Environmental Quality, Air Quality

Rule R307-352

Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings

Change in Proposed Rule

DAR File No.: 38684
Filed: 10/07/2014 10:03:20 AM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The EPA has indicated its intention to approve the area source coatings rules for the PM2.5 State Implementation Plan as reasonable available control technology (RACT), but not until: 1) they are amended to clarify that the amount of control removal specified in each rule is based on the entire system, and 2) the inspection and recordkeeping requirements for these systems are expanded. These changes were proposed to this and 13 other air quality area source rules, and a 30-day public comment period was held. During the public comment period, several inquiries were made regarding why the rules do not permit the use of exempt solvents for cleaning. The definition of "volatile organic compound (VOC)" found in Section R307-101-2 incorporates the definition of VOC found in 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1). This definition does permit the use of exempt compounds for cleaning; however, this allowance is not explicitly stated in this or the other proposed area source rules. The change to the proposed rule is to specify that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition.

Summary of the rule or change:

The change clarifies that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition. (DAR NOTE: The original proposed amendment upon which this change in proposed rule (CPR) was based was published in the August 1, 2014, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 36. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the CPR and the proposed amendment together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.)

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a)

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget.

local governments:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to local government.

small businesses:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to small businesses.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

This change is to add clarifying language and does not change any of the rule requirements; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

This change is to add language to clarify that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition. This change does not result in any additional compliance costs.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

This change is to add language to clarify that exempt compounds are not VOC by definition. This change will not have a fiscal impact on businesses.

Amanda Smith, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Environmental Quality
Air QualityRoom Fourth Floor
195 N 1950 W
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Mark Berger at the above address, by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

This rule may become effective on:

12/01/2014

Authorized by:

Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality.

R307-352. Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings.

R307-352-1. Purpose.

The purpose of this rule is to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the coating of metal coils, cans, pails, and lids in the manufacturing or reconditioning process.

 

R307-352-2. Applicability.

R307-352 applies to sources located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah and Weber counties that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of VOC, including related cleaning activities.

 

R307-352-3. Definitions.

The following additional definitions apply to R307-352:

"Coating" means a protective, functional or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface.

"End sealing compound" means a compound which is coated onto can ends and which functions as a gasket when the end is assembled onto the can.

"Exterior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the exterior of the container body to provide a decorative or protective finish.

"Interior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the interior of the can body to provide a protective film between the product and the can.

"Metal container or closure coating" means any coating applied to either the interior or exterior of formed metal cans, pails, lids or crowns or flat metal sheets which are intended to be formed into cans, pails, lids or crowns.

"Overvarnish" means a coating applied directly over a design coating to reduce the coefficient of friction, to provide gloss and to protect the finish against abrasion and corrosion.

"Reconditioned pails or lids" means any metal container which is reused, recycled or remanufactured.

"Three-piece can side-seam coating" means a coating sprayed on the exterior and/or interior of a welded, cemented or soldered seam to protect the exposed metal.

"Two-piece can exterior-end coating" means a coating applied to the exterior bottom end of a can to reduce the coefficient of friction and to provide protection to the metal.

 

R307-352-4. VOC Content Limits.

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use an add-on control device as specified in R307-352-6.

 

TABLE 1

METAL CONTAINER AND CLOSURE COIL COATING LIMITATIONS
(values in pounds VOC per gallon of coating, minus water and
exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC as defined in 
R307-101-2), as applied)

COATING CATEGORY                          VOC CONTENT LIMITS

CANS

Sheet basecoat (interior and exterior)
and overvarnish                                    1.9

Two-piece can exterior basecoat,
overvarnish, and end coating                       2.1

Interior body spray

     Two-piece cans                                3.5

     Three-piece cans                              3.0

Three-piece can side seam spray                    5.5

End sealing compound:  Food cans, non-food
cans, and beverage cans                            0.1
Exterior body spray                                3.5

PAILS AND LIDS

Body spray

     Reconditioned interior                        4.2

     Reconditioned exterior                        3.5

     New interior                                  3.5

     New exterior                                  2.8

End sealing compound                               0.5

Inks, all applications                             2.5

Coil
Coil coating                                       1.7

 

R307-352-5. Work Practices and Recordkeeping.

(1) The owner or operator shall:

(a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in closed containers;

(b) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials;

(c) Clean up spills immediately;

(d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in closed containers or pipes;

(e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and other materials except when specifically in use; and

(f) Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage, mixing, and conveying equipment.

(2) No person shall apply any coating unless the coating application method achieves a demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency.

The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% transfer efficiency and shall be operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications:

(a) Electrostatic application;

(b) Flow coat;

(c) Roll coat;

(d) Dip coat;

(e) High-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray;

(f) Hand application methods;

(g) Printing techniques; or

(h) Other application method capable of achieving at least 65% transfer efficiency, as certified by the manufacturer.

(3) All persons shall perform solvent cleaning operations with cleaning material having VOC content (excluding water and solvents exempt from the definition of volatile organic compounds found in R307-101-2) of 0.21 lb/gallon or less.

(4) All sources subject to R307-352 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with R307-352-4 and R307-352-5.

(a) Records shall include, but not be limited to, inventory and product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-352.

(b) These records shall be made available to the director upon request.

 

R307-352-6. Add-On Controls Systems Operations.

(1) The owner or operator shall install and maintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control system, provided that the emission control system is operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations in order to maintain at least 90% capture and control efficiency. Determination of overall capture and control efficiency shall be determined using EPA approved methods, as follows.

(a) The capture efficiency of a VOC emission control system's VOC collection device shall be determined according to EPA's "Guidelines for Determining Capture Efficiency," January 9, 1995 and 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix M, Methods 204-204F, as applicable.

(b) The control efficiency of a VOC emission control system's VOC control device shall be determined using test methods in Appendices A-1, A-6, and A-7 to 40 CFR Part 60, for measuring flow rates, total gaseous organic concentrations, or emissions of exempt compounds, as applicable.

(c) An alternative test method may be substituted for the preceding test methods after review and approval by the EPA Administrator.

(2) The owner or operator of a control system shall provide documentation that the emission control system will attain the requirements of R307-352-6(1).

(3) The owner or operator shall maintain records of key system parameters necessary to ensure compliance with R307-352-6. Key system parameters may include, but are not limited to, temperature, pressure and flow rates. Operator inspection schedule, monitoring, recordkeeping, and key parameters shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, and as required to demonstrate operations are providing continuous emission reduction from the source during all periods that the operations cause emissions from the source.

(4) The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations.

 

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, metal containers, coil coatings

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2014

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1)(a)