DAR File No. 39390
This rule was published in the June 1, 2015, issue (Vol. 2015, No. 11) of the Utah State Bulletin.
Professional Practices Advisory Commission, Administration
Rule R686-101
UPPAC Hearing Procedures and Reports
Notice of Proposed Rule
(Repeal)
DAR File No.: 39390
Filed: 05/15/2015 09:13:36 AM
RULE ANALYSIS
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
H.B. 345, Education Abuse Policy, 2015 General Session, changed rulemaking authority from UPPAC to the Utah State Board of Education (Board). This rule is repealed in response to the legislation.
Summary of the rule or change:
Rule R686-101 is repealed in its entirety.
State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
- Subsection 53A-6-306(1)(a)
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to the state budget. Rule R686-101 is repealed and will be replaced with a new Board rule under Title R277. (DAR NOTE: The proposed new rules are Rule R277-200 under DAR No. 39382, Rule R277-201 under DAR No. 39383, Rule R277-202 under DAR No. 39384, Rule R277-203 under DAR No. 39385, Rule R277-204 under DAR No. 39386, Rule R277-205 under DAR No. 39387, and Rule R277-206 under DAR No. 39388 in this issue, June 1, 2015, of the Bulletin.)
local governments:
It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to local government. Rule R686-101 is repealed and will be replaced with a new Board rule under Title R277.
small businesses:
It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to small businesses. Rule R686-101 is repealed and will be replaced with a new Board rule under Title R277.
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:
It is anticipated that there is likely no cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities. Rule R686-101 is repealed and will be replaced with a new Board rule under Title R277.
Compliance costs for affected persons:
There are likely no compliance costs for affected persons. Rule R686-101 is repealed and will be replaced with a new Board rule under Title R277.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
I have reviewed this rule and I believe that there is likely no fiscal impact on businesses.
Brad C. Smith, State Superintendent
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:
Professional Practices Advisory CommissionAdministration
250 E 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111
Direct questions regarding this rule to:
- Benjamin Rasmussen at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
07/01/2015
This rule may become effective on:
07/08/2015
Authorized by:
Angela Stallings, Associate Superintendent, Policy and Communication
RULE TEXT
[R686. Professional Practices Advisory Commission,
Administration.
R686-101. UPPAC Hearing Procedures and Reports.
R686-101-1. Definitions.
A. "Administrative hearing" means a formal
adjudicative proceeding consistent with 53A-6-601. The Utah State
Board of Education and Utah State Office of Education licensing
process is not governed by the Utah Administrative Procedures
Act, Title 63G, Chapter 4.
B. "Answer" means a written response to a
complaint filed by USOE alleging educator misconduct. An answer
must be filed within 30 days of receipt of a complaint. Failure
to file an answer to a complaint shall result in a default,
consistent with R686-100-5E.
C. "Board" means the Utah State Board of
Education.
D. "Complaint" means a written allegation or
charge against an educator filed by USOE against the
educator.
E. "Complainant" means the Utah State Office of
Education.
F. "Comprehensive Administration of Credentials for
Teachers in Utah Schools (CACTUS)" means the electronic file
owned and maintained on all licensed Utah educators. The file
includes information such as:
(1) personal directory information;
(2) educational background;
(3) endorsements;
(4) employment history; and
(5) a record of disciplinary action taken against the
educator's license.
G. "Days": in calculating any period of time
prescribed or allowed by these rules, the day of the act, event,
or default from which the designated period of time begins to run
shall not be included; the last day of the period shall be
included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday,
in which event the period runs until the end of the next day
which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday. Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays shall not be included in calculating
the period of time if the period prescribed or allowed is less
than seven days, but shall be included in calculating periods of
seven or more days.
H. "Educator" means a person who currently
holds a license, held a license at the time of an alleged
offense, is an applicant for a license, or is a person in
training to obtain a license.
I. "Educator paper licensing file" means the
file maintained securely by UPPAC on an educator. The file is
opened following UPPAC's direction to investigate alleged
misconduct. The file contains the original notification of
misconduct, subsequent correspondence, the investigative report,
and the final disposition of the case.
J. "Executive Secretary" means an employee of
the Utah State Office of Education who is appointed by the State
Superintendent of Public Instruction to serve as the executive
officer, and a non-voting member, of UPPAC.
K. "Final action" means any action by UPPAC or
the Board which concludes an investigation of an allegation of
misconduct against a licensed educator.
L. "Hearing" means an administrative proceeding
held pursuant to Section 53A-6-601, is a formal adjudication in
which allegations made in a complaint are examined before a
hearing officer and UPPAC hearing panel, where each party has the
opportunity to present witnesses and evidence relevant to the
complaint and respond to witnesses or evidence presented by the
other party. At the conclusion of a hearing, the hearing officer,
after consulting with members of the UPPAC hearing panel,
prepares a hearing report and submits it to the Executive
Secretary.
M. "Hearing officer" means a person who is
experienced in matters relating to administrative procedures,
education and education law and is either a member of the Utah
State Bar Association or a person not a member of the bar who has
received specialized training in conducting administrative
hearings, and is appointed by the Executive Secretary at the
request of UPPAC to manage the proceedings of a hearing. The
hearing officer may not be an acting member of UPPAC. The hearing
officer has broad authority to regulate the course of the hearing
and dispose of procedural requests but shall not have a vote as
to the recommended disposition of a case.
N. "Hearing panel" means a hearing officer and
three or more members of UPPAC agreed upon by UPPAC to assist the
hearing officer in conjunction with the hearing panel in
conducting a hearing and preparing a hearing report.
O. "Hearing report" means a report prepared by
the hearing officer consistent with the recommendations of the
hearing panel at the conclusion of a hearing. The report includes
a recommended disposition, detailed findings of fact and
conclusions of law, based upon the evidence presented in the
hearing, relevant precedent, and applicable law and
rule.
P. "LEA" means a local education agency,
including local school boards/public school districts, charter
schools, and, for purposes of this rule, the Utah Schools for the
Deaf and the Blind.
Q. "License" means a teaching or administrative
credential, including endorsements, which is issued by a state to
signify authorization for the person holding the license to
provide professional services in the state's public
schools.
R. "Party" means the complainant or the
respondent.
S. "Prosecutor" means the attorney designated
by the USOE to represent the complainant and present evidence in
support of the complaint. The prosecutor may also be the
investigator, but does not have to be.
T. "Recommended disposition" means a
recommendation provided by a UPPAC investigator for resolution of
an allegation.
U. "Revocation" means a permanent invalidation
of a Utah educator license consistent with R277-517.
V. "Respondent" means the party against whom a
complaint is filed or an investigation is undertaken.
W. "Stipulated agreement" means an agreement
between a respondent/educator and the USOE/Board or between a
respondent/educator and UPPAC under which disciplinary action
against an educator's license status shall be taken, in lieu
of a hearing. At any time after an investigative letter has been
sent, a stipulated agreement may be negotiated between the
parties and becomes binding when approved by the Board, if
necessary, or UPPAC if Board approval is not necessary.
X. "Suspension" means an invalidation of a Utah
educator license. A suspension may include specific conditions
that an educator shall satisfy and may identify a minimum time
period that shall elapse before the educator can request a
reinstatement hearing before UPPAC.
Y. "Utah Professional Practices Advisory Commission
(UPPAC)" means an advisory commission established to assist
and advise the Board in matters relating to the professional
practices of educators, as established under Section
53A-6-301.
Z. "UPPAC disciplinary letters or action" means
letters sent or action taken by UPPAC informing the educator of
licensing disciplinary action not rising to the level of license
suspension. Disciplinary letters and action include the
following:
(1) Letter of admonishment is a letter sent by UPPAC to
the educator cautioning the educator to avoid or take specific
actions in the future;
(2) Letter of warning is a letter sent by UPPAC to an
educator for misconduct that was inappropriate or unethical that
does not warrant longer term or more serious discipline;
(3) Letter of reprimand is a letter sent by UPPAC to an
educator for misconduct that was longer term or more seriously
unethical or inappropriate than conduct warranting a letter of
warning, but not warranting more serious discipline; a letter of
reprimand may provide specific directives to the educator as a
condition for removal of the letter, and shall appear as a
notation on the educator's CACTUS file;
(4) Probation is an action directed by UPPAC that
involves some monitoring or supervision for an indefinite or
designated time period usually accompanied by a disciplinary
letter. In this time period, the educator may be subject to
additional monitoring by an identified person or entity and the
educator may be asked to satisfy certain conditions in order to
have the probation lifted. This discipline usually, but not
always, is accompanied by a letter of warning or a letter of
reprimand and shall appear as a notation on the educator's
CACTUS file. Unless otherwise specified, the probationary period
is at least two years and must be terminated through a formal
petition by respondent.
AA. "USOE" means the Utah State Office of
Education.
R686-101-2. Authority and Purpose.
A. This rule is authorized by Section 53A-6-306(1)(a)
which directs UPPAC to adopt rules to carry out its
responsibilities under the law.
B. The purpose of this rule is to establish procedures
regarding UPPAC hearings and hearing reports.
R686-101-3. Scheduling a Hearing.
A. Scheduling the hearing: Following receipt of an answer
by respondent requesting a hearing:
(1) UPPAC shall select panel members.
(2) The Executive Secretary shall appoint a hearing
officer from among a list of hearing officers identified by the
state procurement process and approved by UPPAC.
(3) UPPAC shall schedule the date, time, and place for
the hearing.
(4) The date for the hearing shall be scheduled not less
than 25 days nor more than 180 days from the date the answer is
received by the Executive Secretary. The required scheduling
periods may be waived by mutual written consent of the parties or
by UPPAC for good cause shown.
B. Change of hearing date:
(1) A request for change of hearing date by any party
shall be submitted in writing, include a statement of the reasons
for the request, and be received by the Executive Secretary at
least five days prior to the scheduled date of the
hearing.
(2) The Executive Secretary shall determine whether the
cause stated in the request is sufficient to warrant a
change.
(a) If the cause is found to be sufficient, the Executive
Secretary shall promptly notify all parties of the new time,
date, and place for the hearing.
(b) If the cause is found to be insufficient, the
Executive Secretary shall immediately notify the parties that the
request has been denied.
(c) The Executive Secretary and the parties may waive the
time period required for requesting a change of hearing date for
compelling circumstances.
R686-101-4. Appointment and Duties of the Hearing Officer
and Hearing Panel.
A. Hearing officer: The Executive Secretary shall appoint
a hearing officer at the request of UPPAC to chair the hearing
panel and conduct the hearing.
(1) The selection of hearing officers shall be on a
rotating basis, to the extent practicable, from the list of
available hearing officers.
(2) The selection of a hearing officer shall be made
based on availability of individual hearing officers and whether
any financial or personal interest or prior relationship with
parties might affect the hearing officer's impartiality or
otherwise constitute a conflict of interest.
(3) The Executive Secretary shall provide such
information about the case as necessary to determine whether the
hearing officer has a conflict of interest and shall disqualify
any hearing officer that cannot serve under the Utah Rules of
Professional Conduct.
(4) Duties of a hearing officer. A hearing
officer:
(a) may require the parties to submit briefs and lists of
witnesses prior to the hearing;
(b)presides at the hearing and regulates the course of
the proceedings;
(c) administers oaths to witnesses as follows: "Do
you swear or affirm that the testimony you will give is the
truth?";
(d) may take testimony, rule on questions of evidence,
and ask questions of witnesses to clarify specific
issues;
(e) prepares and submits a hearing report at the
conclusion of the proceedings in consultation with panel members
and the timelines of this rule.
B. UPPAC panel members: UPPAC shall agree upon three or
more UPPAC members to serve as members of the hearing panel. As
directed by UPPAC, former UPPAC members who have served on UPPAC
within the three years prior to the date set for the hearing may
be used as panel members. The majority of panel members shall be
current UPPAC members.
(1) The selection of panel members shall be on a rotating
basis to the extent practicable. However, the selection shall
also accommodate the availability of panel members.
(2) If the respondent is a teacher, at least one panel
member shall be a teacher. If the respondent is a non-teacher
educator, at least one panel member shall be a non-teacher
educator unless the respondent accepts a different
configuration.
(3) Duties of UPPAC panel members include:
(a) assisting the hearing officer by providing
information concerning professional standards and practices of
educators in the respondent's particular field of practice
and in the situations alleged;
(b) asking questions of all witnesses to clarify specific
issues;
(c) reviewing all evidence and briefs, if any, presented
at the hearing;
(d) assisting the hearing officer in preparing the
hearing report.
(4) The panel members may receive documents or
information no more than 30 minutes prior to the hearing,
including the complaint and response, and a list of witnesses who
shall participate in the hearing, other materials as directed by
the hearing officer, or additional materials agreed to by the
parties.
(5) The Executive Secretary may make an emergency
substitution of a panel member for cause with the consent of the
parties. The agreement should be in writing. Parties may agree to
a two-member UPPAC panel in an emergency situation. If parties do
not agree, the hearing shall be rescheduled.
C. Disqualification of the hearing officer or a panel
member:
(1) Hearing officer:
(a) A party may seek disqualification of a hearing
officer by submitting a written request for disqualification to
the Executive Secretary, which request must be received not less
than 15 days before a scheduled hearing. The Executive Secretary
shall review the request and supporting evidence and, upon a
finding that the reasons for the request are substantial and
sufficient, shall appoint a new hearing officer and, if
necessary, reschedule the hearing. A hearing officer may recuse
himself from a hearing if, in the hearing officer's opinion,
his participation would violate any of the Utah Rules of
Professional Conduct consistent with the Supreme Court Rules of
Professional Practice.
(b) If the Executive Secretary denies the request, the
party requesting the disqualification shall be notified not less
than ten days prior to the date of the hearing. The requesting
party may submit a written appeal of the denial to the State
Superintendent, which request must be received not less than five
days prior to the hearing date. If the State Superintendent finds
that the appeal is justified, the State Superintendent shall
direct the Executive Secretary to appoint a new hearing officer
and, if necessary, reschedule the hearing.
(c) The decision of the State Superintendent is
final.
(d) Failure of a party to meet the time requirements of
R686-101-4C(1)(b) shall result in denial of the request or
appeal; if the Executive Secretary fails to meet the time
requirements, the request or appeal shall be approved.
(2) UPPAC panel member:
(a) A UPPAC member shall disqualify himself as a panel
member due to any known financial or personal interest, prior
relationship, personal and independent knowledge of the persons
or issues in the case, or other association that the panel member
believes would compromise the panel member's ability to make
an impartial decision.
(b) A party may seek disqualification of a UPPAC panel
member by submitting a written request for disqualification to
the hearing officer, or the Executive Secretary if there is no
hearing officer; the request shall be received not less than 15
days before a scheduled hearing. The hearing officer, or the
Executive Secretary, if there is no hearing officer, shall review
the request and supporting evidence and, upon a finding that the
reasons for the request are substantial and compelling, shall
disqualify the panel member. If the disqualification leaves the
hearing panel with fewer than three UPPAC panel members, UPPAC
shall appoint a replacement and the Executive Secretary shall, if
necessary, reschedule the hearing.
(c) If the request is denied, the party requesting the
disqualification shall be notified not less than ten days prior
to the date of the hearing. The requesting party may file a
written appeal of the denial to the State Superintendent, which
request shall be received not less than five days prior to the
hearing date. If the State Superintendent finds that the appeal
is justified, he shall direct the hearing officer, or the
Executive Secretary if there is no hearing officer, to replace
the panel member.
(d) If a disqualification leaves the hearing panel with
fewer than three UPPAC panel members, UPPAC shall agree upon a
replacement and the Executive Secretary shall, if necessary,
reschedule the hearing.
(e) The decision of the State Superintendent is
final.
(f) Failure of a party to meet the time requirements of
R686-101-4C(2)(c) shall result in denial of the request or
appeal; if the hearing officer fails to meet the time
requirements, the request or appeal shall be approved.
D. The Executive Secretary may, at the time he selects
the hearing officer or panel members, select alternative hearing
officers or panel members following the process for selecting
those individuals. Substitution of alternative panel members
requires only notice to both parties.
R686-101-5. Preliminary Instructions to Parties to a
Hearing.
A. Not less than 25 days before the date of a hearing the
Executive Secretary shall provide the parties with the following
information:
(1) Date, time, and location of the hearing;
(2) Names and LEA affiliations of the panel members, and
the name of the hearing officer;
(3) Procedures for objecting to any member of the hearing
panel; and
(4) Procedures for requesting a change in the hearing
date.
B. Not less than 20 days before the date of the hearing,
the respondent and the complainant shall provide the following to
the other party and to the hearing officer:
(1) A brief, if requested by the hearing officer,
containing any procedural and evidentiary motions along with that
party's position regarding the allegations. Submitted briefs
shall include relevant laws, rules, and precedent;
(2) The name of the person who shall represent the party
at the hearing, a list of witnesses expected to be called, a
summary of the testimony which each witness is expected to
present, and a summary of documentary evidence which shall be
submitted.
(3) Following receipt of each party's witness list,
each party may provide a list of anticipated rebuttal witnesses
and evidence no later than 10 days prior to the hearing.
(4) No witness or evidence may be presented at the
hearing if the opposing party has requested to be notified of
such information and has not been fairly apprised at least 20
days prior to the hearing, or 10 days prior to the hearing if the
witness or evidence is to be used for rebuttal purposes. The
timeliness requirement may be waived by agreement of the parties
or by the hearing officer upon a showing of good cause or by the
hearing officer's determination that no prejudice has
occurred to the opposing party. This restriction shall not apply
to rebuttal witnesses whose testimony cannot reasonably be
anticipated before the time of the hearing.
C. Not less than 10 days before the date of the hearing,
the respondent and the complainant shall provide to the other
party and the hearing officer the documents referenced on the
summary of documentary evidence previously provided, to be
entered as evidence in the hearing.
D. If a party fails to comply in good faith with a
directive of the hearing officer, including time requirements,
the hearing officer may prohibit introduction of the testimony or
evidence or take other steps reasonably appropriate under the
circumstances including, in extreme cases of noncompliance, entry
of a default against the offending party. Nothing in this Section
prevents the use of rebuttal witnesses.
E. Parties shall provide materials to the hearing
officer, panel members and UPPAC as directed by the hearing
officer.
R686-101-6. Hearing Parties' Representation.
A. Complainant: The complainant shall be represented by a
person appointed by the USOE prosecutor.
B. Respondent: A respondent may represent himself or be
represented, at his own cost, by another person.
C. The informant has no right to individual
representation at the hearing or to be present or heard at the
hearing unless called as a witness.
D. The Executive Secretary shall receive timely notice in
writing of representation by anyone other than the
respondent.
R686-101-7. Discovery Prior to a Hearing.
A. Discovery is permitted to the extent necessary to
obtain relevant information necessary to support claims or
defenses, as determined by the appointed hearing
officer.
B. Discovery, especially burdensome or unduly legalistic
discovery, may not be used to delay a hearing.
C. Discovery may be limited by the hearing officer at his
discretion or upon a motion by either party. The hearing officer
rules on all discovery requests and motions.
D. Subpoenas and other orders to secure the attendance of
witnesses or the production of evidence shall be issued pursuant
to Section 53A-6-306(2)(c) if requested by either party at least
five working days prior to the hearing.
E. No expert witness report or testimony may be presented
at the hearing unless the requirements of R686-101-11 have been
met.
R686-101-8. Burden and Standard of Proof for UPPAC
Proceedings.
A. In matters other than those involving applicants for
licensing, and excepting the presumptions under R686-101-12F, the
complainant shall have the burden of proving that action against
the license is appropriate.
B. An applicant for licensing has the burden of proving
that licensing is appropriate.
C. Standard of proof: The standard of proof in all UPPAC
hearings is a preponderance of the evidence.
D. Evidence: The Utah Rules of Evidence are not
applicable to UPPAC proceedings. The criteria to decide
evidentiary questions shall be:
(1) reasonable reliability of the offered
evidence;
(2) fairness to both parties; and
(3) usefulness to UPPAC in reaching a decision.
E. The hearing officer has the sole responsibility to
determine the application of the hearing rules and the
admissibility of evidence.
R686-101-9. Deportment.
A. Parties, their representatives, witnesses, and other
persons present during a hearing shall conduct themselves in an
appropriate manner during hearings, giving due respect to members
of the hearing panel and complying with the instructions of the
hearing officer. The hearing officer may exclude persons from the
hearing room who fail to conduct themselves in an appropriate
manner and may, in response to extreme instances of
noncompliance, disallow testimony or declare an offending party
to be in default.
B. Parties, attorneys for parties, or other participants
in the professional practices investigation and hearing process
shall not harass, intimidate or pressure witnesses or other
hearing participants, nor shall they direct others to harass,
intimidate or pressure witnesses or participants.
R686-101-10. Hearing Record.
A. The hearing shall be recorded at UPPAC's expense,
and the recording shall become part of the permanent case record,
unless otherwise agreed upon by all parties.
B. Individual parties may, at their own expense, make
recordings or transcripts of the proceedings with notice to the
Executive Secretary.
C. If an exhibit is admitted as evidence, the record
shall reflect the contents of the exhibit.
D. All evidence and statements presented at a hearing
shall become part of the permanent case file and shall not be
removed except by direction of the hearing officer or order of
the Board.
E. The USOE record of the proceedings may be reviewed
upon request of a party under supervision of the Executive
Secretary and only at the USOE.
R686-101-11. Expert Witnesses in UPPAC Proceedings.
A. A party may call an expert witness at its own expense.
Notice of intent of a party to call an expert witness, the
identity and qualifications of such expert witness and the
purpose for which the expert witness is to be called shall be
provided to the hearing officer and the opposing party at least
15 days prior to the hearing date.
B. The hearing officer may appoint any expert witness
agreed upon by the parties or of the hearing officer's own
selection. An expert so appointed shall be informed of his duties
by the hearing officer in writing, a copy of which shall become
part of the permanent case file. The expert shall advise the
hearing panel and the parties of his findings and may thereafter
be called to testify by the hearing panel or by any party. He may
be examined by each party or by any of the hearing panel
members.
C. Defects in the qualifications of expert witnesses,
once a minimum threshold of expertise is established, go to the
weight to be given the testimony and not to its
admissibility.
D. Experts who are members of the complainant's staff
or an LEA staff may testify and have their testimony considered
as part of the record along with that of any other
expert.
E. Any report of an expert witness which a party intends
to introduce into evidence shall be provided to the opposing
party at least 15 days prior to the hearing date.
F. The hearing officer may allow testimony by expert
witnesses by mutual agreement of the parties or if the hearing
officer allows the testimony.
R686-101-12. Evidence and Participation in UPPAC
Proceedings.
A. The hearing officer may not exclude evidence solely
because it is hearsay.
B. Each party has the right to call witnesses, present
evidence, argue, respond, cross-examine witnesses who testify in
person at the hearing, and submit rebuttal evidence.
C. All testimony presented at the hearing, if offered as
evidence to be considered in reaching a decision on the merits,
shall be given under oath.
D. If a case involves allegations of child abuse or of a
sexual offense against a child, either party or a member of the
hearing panel, the hearing officer may request that a minor be
allowed to testify outside of the respondent's presence. If
the hearing officer determines that the minor would suffer
serious emotional or mental harm or that the minor's
testimony in the presence of the respondent would be unreliable,
the minor's testimony may be admitted in one of the following
ways:
(1) An oral statement of a victim or witness younger than
18 years of age which is recorded prior to the filing of a
complaint shall be admissible as evidence in a hearing regarding
the offense if:
(a) No attorney for either party is in the minor's
presence when the statement is recorded;
(b) The recording is visual and aural and is
recorded;
(c) The recording equipment is capable of making an
accurate recording, the operator of the equipment is competent,
and the recording is accurate and has not been altered;
and
(d) Each voice in the recording is identified.
(2) The testimony of any witness or victim younger than
18 years of age may be taken in a room other than the hearing
room, and be transmitted by closed circuit equipment to another
room where it can be viewed by the respondent. All of the
following conditions shall be observed:
(a) Only the hearing panel members, attorneys for each
party, persons necessary to operate equipment, and a person
approved by the hearing officer whose presence contributes to the
welfare and emotional well-being of the minor may be with the
minor during the testimony.
(b) The respondent may not be present during the
minor's testimony;
(c) The hearing officer shall ensure that the minor
cannot hear or see the respondent;
(d) The respondent shall be permitted to observe and
hear, but not communicate with the minor; and
(e) Only hearing panel members, the hearing officer and
the attorneys may question the minor.
(3) If the hearing officer determines that the testimony
of a minor shall be taken consistent with R686-101-12D, the child
may not be required to testify in any proceeding where the
recorded testimony is used.
E. On his own motion or upon objection by a party, the
hearing officer:
(1) May exclude evidence that the hearing officer
determines to be irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly
repetitious;
(2) Shall exclude evidence that is privileged under law
applicable to administrative proceedings in Utah unless
waived;
(3) May receive documentary evidence in the form of a
copy or excerpt if the copy or excerpt contains all pertinent
portions of the original document;
(4) May take official notice of any facts that could be
judicially noticed under judicial or administrative laws of Utah,
or from the record of other proceedings before the
agency.
F. Presumptions:
(1) A rebuttable evidentiary presumption exists that a
person has committed a sexual offense against a minor if the
person has:
(a) Been found, pursuant to a criminal, civil, or
administrative action to have committed a sexual offense against
a minor;
(b) Failed to defend himself against such a charge when
given a reasonable opportunity to do so; or
(c) Voluntarily surrendered a license or allowed a
license to lapse in the face of a charge of having committed a
sexual offense against a minor.
(2) A rebuttable evidentiary presumption exists that a
person is unfit to serve as an educator if the person has been
found pursuant to a criminal, civil, or administrative action to
have exhibited behavior evidencing unfitness for duty, including
immoral, unprofessional, or incompetent conduct, or other
violation of standards of ethical conduct, performance, or
professional competence. Evidence of such behavior may
include:
(a) conviction of a felony;
(b) a felony charge and subsequent conviction for a
lesser related charge pursuant to a plea bargain or plea in
abeyance;
(c) an investigation of an educator's license,
certificate or authorization in another state; or
(d) the expiration, surrender, suspension, revocation, or
invalidation for any reasons of an educator license.
R686-101-13. Hearing Report.
A. Within 20 days after the hearing, or within 20 days
after the deadline imposed for the filing of any post-hearing
materials permitted by the hearing officer, the hearing officer
shall sign and issue a hearing report consistent with the
recommendations of the panel that includes:
(1) A detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law
based upon the evidence of record or on facts officially noted.
Findings of fact may not be based solely upon hearsay, and
conclusions shall be based upon competent evidence;
(2) A statement of relevant precedent, if
available;
(3) A statement of applicable law and rule;
(4) A recommended disposition of UPPAC panel members
which shall be one or an appropriate combination of the
following:
(a) Dismissal of the complaint: The hearing report shall
indicate that the complaint should be dismissed and that no
further action should be taken.
(b) Letter of admonishment: the hearing report shall
indicate that respondent's conduct is of concern and shall
direct the Executive Secretary to write a letter of admonishment,
consistent with R277-517, to the respondent.
(c) Letter of warning: the hearing report shall indicate
that respondent's conduct is deemed unprofessional and shall
direct the Executive Secretary to write a letter of warning,
consistent with R277-517, to the respondent.
(d) Letter of reprimand: the hearing report shall
indicate that respondent's conduct is deemed unprofessional
and shall direct the Executive Secretary to write a letter of
reprimand, consistent with R277-517, to the respondent.
(e) Probation: The hearing report shall determine whether
the respondent's conduct was unprofessional, that the
respondent shall not lose his license, but that a probationary
period is appropriate. If the report recommends probation, the
report shall designate:
(i) it is the respondent's responsibility to petition
UPPAC for removal of probation and letter of reprimand from the
respondent's active licensing and CACTUS files;
(ii) a probationary time period or specifically designate
an indefinite period;
(iii) conditions that can be monitored;
(iv) if recommended by the panel, a person or entity to
monitor a respondent's probation;
(v) a statement providing for costs of
probation.
(vi) whether or not the respondent may work in any
capacity in public education during the probationary
period.
(vii) a probation may be imposed substantially in the
form of a plea in abeyance. The respondent's penalty is
stayed subject to the satisfactory completion of probationary
conditions. The decision shall provide for appropriate or
presumed discipline should the probationary conditions not be
fully satisfied.
(f) Suspension: The hearing report shall recommend to the
Board that the license of the respondent be suspended for a
specific or indefinite period of time and until specified
reinstatement conditions have been met before respondent may
petition for reinstatement of his license.
(g) Revocation: The hearing report may recommend to the
State Board of Education that the license of the respondent be
revoked.
(5) Notice of the right to appeal; and
(6) Time limits applicable to appeal.
B. Processing the hearing report:
(1) The hearing officer shall circulate the draft report
to hearing panel members prior to the 20 day completion deadline
of the hearing report.
(2) Hearing panel members shall notify the hearing
officer of any changes to the report as soon as possible after
receiving the report and prior to the 20 day completion deadline
of the hearing report.
(3) The hearing officer shall file the completed hearing
report with the Executive Secretary, who shall review the report
with UPPAC.
(4) The Executive Secretary may participate in
UPPAC's deliberation as a resource to UPPAC in explaining the
hearing report and answering any procedural questions raised by
UPPAC members.
(5) The hearing officer may confer with the Executive
Secretary or the panel members or both while preparing the
hearing report. The hearing officer may request the Executive
Secretary to confer with the hearing officer and panel following
the hearing.
(6) The Executive Secretary may return a hearing report
to a hearing officer if the Report is incomplete, unclear, or
unreadable, or missing essential components or
information.
(7) If UPPAC finds that there have not been significant
procedural errors, that recommendations are based upon a
reasonable interpretation of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and that all issues explained in the hearing report are
adequately addressed in the conclusions of the report, UPPAC
shall vote to uphold the hearing officer's and panel's
report and do one of the following:
(a) If the recommendation is for final action to be taken
by UPPAC, UPPAC shall direct the Executive Secretary to prepare a
corresponding final order and provide all parties with a copy of
the order and hearing report. A copy of the order and the hearing
report shall be placed in and become part of the permanent case
file. The order shall be effective upon approval by
UPPAC.
(b) If the recommendation is for final action to be taken
by the Board, the Executive Secretary shall forward a copy of the
hearing report to the Board for its further action. A copy of the
hearing report shall also be placed in and become part of the
permanent case file.
(8) If UPPAC determines that:
(a) the hearing process had procedural errors;
(b) the hearing officer's report is not based upon a
reasonable interpretation of the evidence presented at the
hearing;
(c) that the conclusions and findings of the hearing
report do not provide adequate guidance to the educator;
or
(d) that the findings or conclusions of the hearing
report do not adequately address the evidence as outlined in the
hearing report, the Board or UPPAC may:
(i) direct the Executive Secretary to schedule the matter
for rehearing before a hearing officer and panel; or
(ii) direct the Executive Secretary to amend the hearing
report to reflect the UPPAC decision.
C. Consistent with Section 63G-2-301(2)(c), the final
administrative disposition of all administrative proceedings of
UPPAC contained in the recommended disposition section of the
hearing report shall be public.
D. A respondent's failure to comply with the terms of
a final disposition that includes a probation or suspension of
the respondent's license may result in additional discipline
against the educator license.
E. If a hearing officer fails to satisfy the
responsibilities under this rule, UPPAC may:
(1) notify the Utah State Bar of the failure;
(2) reduce the hearing officer's compensation
consistent with the failure;
(3) take timely action to avoid disadvantaging either
party; and
(4) preclude the hearing officer from further employment
by the Board for UPPAC purposes.
F. Deadlines within this Section may be waived by the
Executive Secretary or UPPAC for good cause shown.
G. All criteria of letters of warning and reprimand,
probation, suspension and revocation shall also apply to the
comparable sections of the final hearing reports.
R686-101-14. Default.
A. The hearing officer may prepare an order of default in
a hearing report including a statement of the grounds for default
and the recommended disposition if:
(1) the respondent fails to attend or participate in a
properly scheduled hearing after receiving proper notice. The
hearing officer may determine that the respondent has failed to
attend a properly scheduled hearing if the respondent has not
appeared within 30 minutes of the appointed time for the hearing
to begin, unless the respondent shows good cause for failing to
appear in a timely manner;
(2) the respondent or the respondent's representative
commits misconduct during the course of the hearing
process.
B. The recommendation of default may be executed by the
Executive Secretary following all applicable time periods,
without further action by UPPAC.
C. Except as provided in R686-101, a default judgment may
result in a recommendation to the Board for revocation or for a
suspension of no less than five years.
D. A default judgment shall result in a recommendation to
the Board for a revocation if the alleged misconduct is conduct
identified in 53A-6-501(2).
R686-101-15. Appeal.
A. UPPAC shall notify a respondent of a UPPAC
recommendation for a suspension of two years or more or a
revocation immediately following the UPPAC meeting finalizing the
UPPAC recommendation.
B. Either party may appeal a final recommendation of
UPPAC for a suspension of the respondent's license for two or
more years or a revocation to the State Superintendent. A request
for review by the State Superintendent shall follow the
procedures in R277-514-3 and be submitted in writing within 15
days from the date that UPPAC sends written notice to the parties
of its recommendation.
C. Either party may appeal the Superintendent's
decision to the Board following the procedures in
R277-514-4.
D. A request for appeal to the State Superintendent or
the Board shall include:
(1) name, position, and address of appellant;
(2) issue(s) being appealed; and
(3) signature of appellant.
R686-101-16. Temporary Suspension of License Pending a
Hearing.
A. If the Executive Secretary determines, after affording
respondent an opportunity to discuss allegations of misconduct,
that reasonable cause exists to believe that the charges will be
proven to be correct and that permitting the respondent to retain
his license prior to hearing would create unnecessary and
unreasonable risks for children, then the Executive Secretary may
order immediate suspension of the Respondent's license
pending final Board action.
B. The formal UPPAC recommendation and evidence of the
temporary suspension may not be introduced at the
hearing.
C. Notice of the temporary suspension shall be provided
to other states under R277-514.
R686-101-17. Remedies for Individuals Beyond UPPAC
Actions.
Despite UPPAC or Board actions, informants or other
injured parties who feel that their rights have been compromised,
impaired or not addressed by the provisions of this rule, may
appeal directly to district court.
KEY: hearings, reports
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: May 8,
2015
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law:
53A-6-306(1)(a)
]
Additional Information
More information about a Notice of Proposed Rule is available online.
The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2015/b20150601.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.
Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([example]). Text to be added is underlined (example). Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.
For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Benjamin Rasmussen at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7835, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]. For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Division of Administrative Rules.