DAR File No. 39592
This rule was published in the September 1, 2015, issue (Vol. 2015, No. 17) of the Utah State Bulletin.
Education, Administration
Rule R277-406
K-3 Reading Improvement Program and the state Reading Goal
Notice of Proposed Rule
(Amendment)
DAR File No.: 39592
Filed: 08/13/2015 01:50:03 PM
RULE ANALYSIS
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
This rule is amended to provide provisions for the Utah State Board of Education to develop uniform standards for acceptable growth goals that a local education agency (LEA) adopts taking into account the approach to calculating the uniform growth goal for LEAs based on Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) data and student growth. The amendments also include technical and conforming changes.
Summary of the rule or change:
The amendments to this rule provide language regarding how the uniform growth goal for LEAs will be calculated and a target of 47.83% for the percentage of students making typical, above typical, or well-above typical progress from the beginning of 3rd grade to the end of the year. Technical and conforming changes are also provided.
State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
- Subsection 53A-17a-150(14)(a)
- Article X, Section 3
- Subsection 53A-1-401(3)
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
The amendments providing how the uniform growth goal will be calculated and technical and conforming changes will likely not result in a cost or savings to the state budget.
local governments:
The amendments providing how the uniform growth goal will be calculated and technical and conforming changes will likely not result in a cost or savings to local government.
small businesses:
The amendments providing how the uniform growth goal will be calculated and technical and conforming changes will likely not result in a cost or savings to small businesses.
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:
The amendments providing how the uniform growth goal will be calculated and technical and conforming changes will likely not result in a cost or savings to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.
Compliance costs for affected persons:
The amendments providing how the uniform growth goal will be calculated and technical and conforming changes will likely not result in any compliance costs for affected persons.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
I believe that there is likely no fiscal impact on businesses.
Brad C. Smith, State Superintendent
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:
EducationAdministration
250 E 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3272
Direct questions regarding this rule to:
- Angela Stallings at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7656, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at angie.stallings@schools.utah.gov
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
10/01/2015
This rule may become effective on:
10/08/2015
Authorized by:
Benjamin Rasmussen, UPPAC Director and Special Counsel
RULE TEXT
R277. Education, Administration.
R277-406. K-3 Reading Improvement Program and the State Reading Goal.
R277-406-[2]1
. Authority and Purpose.
[A.](1) This rule is authorized [under]by:
(a) Utah Constitution, Article X Section 3, which vests
general control and supervision over public education in the Board[, by ];
(b) Subsection 53A-1-401(3)
, which allows the Board to make rules in accordance with
its responsibilities[,]; and[by]
(c) Subsection 53A-17a-150(14)(a) , which directs the Board to develop rules for implementing the K-3 Reading Improvement Program.
[B.](2) The purpose of this rule is to outline the
responsibilities of [USOE]the Superintendent and LEAs for implementation of Section
53A-17A-150, K-3 Reading Improvement Program, and Section
53A-1-606.5, State Reading Goal-Reading Achievement Plan.
R277-406-[1]2
. Definitions.
[A.](1) "Benchmark assessment" means an assessment
that:
(a) is given three times each year at:
(i) the [(]beginning of the
school year[,];
(ii) [middle]the midpoint of the
school year[,]; and
(iii) the end of the
school year[)];
(b) [designed to ]give
s teachers information to
:
(i) plan appropriate instruction[,]; and
(ii) evaluate the effects of [that ]instruction[,]; and[to]
(c) provide s data about the extent to which students are prepared to be successful on the end of year Criterion Referenced Test.
[B. "Board" means the Utah State Board of
Education.
] [C.](2) "Grade level in reading" means that a student
gains adequate meaning from independently reading texts designed
for instruction at that grade level.
[D. "LEA" means a local education agency,
including local school boards/public school districts and charter
schools.
] [E.](3) "LEA plan" means the K-3 Reading Achievement
Program Plan submitted by
a public school district[s and public]
or a charter school[s].
[F.](4) "Midpoint of school year" means January 31 of
the school year.
[G.](5) "Program" means the K-3 Reading Improvement
Program.
[H.](6) "Program money" means [funds allocated to an LEA through the K-3 Reading
Improvement Program]the same as that term is defined in Section 53A-17a-150.
[I.](7) "School plan" means the K-3 Reading
Achievement Program Plan submitted by a
public school[, including]
or a charter school[s].
[J. "USOE" means the Utah State Office of
Education
]
R277-406-3. Board/[USOE]Superintendent
Responsibilities.
[A. The USOE shall provide model Program plans.
] [B.](1) The Board shall approve [the P]a program plan[s] submitted by
an LEA[s] pursuant to [R277-406-4A]Subsection R277-406-4(1).
[C. The Board shall develop uniform standards for acceptable
growth goals that an LEA adopts.
] (2) In accordance with Section 53A-17a-150, the uniform standard for a growth goal is that the goal:
(a) signifies the percentage of third grade students who made typical, above typical, or well-above typical progress from the beginning of the year to the end of the year in third grade as measured by the benchmark assessment; and
(b) sets the target percentage of third graders making typical progress or better at 47.83 percent.
(3) The Superintendent shall use the information provided by an LEA described in Subsection R277-406-4(3) to determine the progress of each student in grade 3 within the following categories:
(i) well-above typical;
(ii) above typical;
(iii) typical;
(iv) below typical; or
(v) well-below typical.
[D. The USOE shall prepare and disseminate a Program report
at the end of each school year from information submitted by
LEAs.
E. The Board shall make a report to the Public Education
Appropriations Subcommittee that includes information
on:
(1) student learning gains in reading for the past school
year and the previous five years;
(2) the percentage of third grade students reading on
grade level in the past school year and the previous five
years;
(3) progress of schools and school districts in meeting
the goals in their K-3 Reading Improvement Plan(s);
(4) correlation between third grade students reading on
grade level and results of third grade language arts scores on
criterion-referenced test or computer adaptive test; and
(5) may include recommendations on how to increase the
percentage of third grade students that read on grade
level.
]
R277-406-4. Responsibilities of LEAs.
[A.](1) To receive Program money, [each elementary school or]a school with K-3 grade levels shall submit a school plan to
its local board or charter board, and each LEA shall submit an LEA
plan to the Board for reading proficiency improvement that
incorporates the [following ]components
described in Subsections 53A-1-606.5(3)(d) and
53A-17a-150(4)(a).[:]
[(1) assessment;
(2) intervention strategies;
(3) research-based best-practices;
(4) professional development for classroom teachers in
kindergarten through grade three;
(5) reading performance standards;
(6) opportunity for parents to receive materials and
guidance to assist their child at home; and
(7) specific measurable, gain-score goals that
include:
(a) a goal of having every student reading at grade level
by the end of grade three;
(b) a growth goal for each public school based on student
learning gains as measured by benchmark assessments administered
to increase the percentage of students who are at or above grade
level at the end of third grade pursuant to Section
53A-1-603(2)d;
(c) goals for kindergarten, first grade, second grade,
and third grade for each public school based upon student
learning gains. As of July 1, 2012 this gain score goal must be
based on benchmark assessments administered pursuant to Section
53A-1-606.6; and
(d) a growth goal for each public school to increase the
percentage of third grade students who read on grade level from
year to year as measured by the third grade reading test
administered pursuant to Section 53A-1-603.
(8) reporting to parents:
(a) effective July 1, 2012, at the beginning, in the
middle, and at the end of grade one, grade two, and grade three,
parents shall receive their child's benchmark assessment
results as required by Section 53A-1-606.6; and
(b) at the end of the third grade year, parents shall be
notified whether or not the child is at grade level in
reading.
] [B.](2) The school plan shall be created:
([1]a) for
a school[s] in a district, under the direction of the
school community council;
([2]b) for
a charter school[s], under the direction of the charter school
governing board.
[C. Program money shall be used only for reading proficiency
improvement and only for students in kindergarten, first grade,
second grade, and third grade, and may be used to supplement but
not supplant other programs.
D. Program money may be used for:
(1) reading assessments;
(2) focused reading interventions that have proven to
significantly increase the percentage of students reading at
grade level including the use of:
(a) reading specialists;
(b) tutoring;
(c) before or after school programs;
(d) summer school programs;
(e) the use of reading software;
(f) or the purchase of portable technology devices used
to administer reading assessments; or
(g) the use of interactive computer software programs for
literacy instruction and assessments for students.
E. An LEA that uses Program money in a manner that is
inconsistent with these rules, Utah law, or established rules of
fiscal accountability shall be directed to reimburse the Board
for the amount of money improperly used or managed.
] [F.](3)(a)
An LEA[s] shall complete the report [pursuant to R277-406-3D]required by Subsections 53A-17a-150(13)(a) and
53A-17a-150(14)(b)(i) within timelines set by the [USOE]Superintendent.
[G. If for two consecutive years an LEA fails to meet its
goal to increase the percentage of third grade students who read on
grade level, the LEA shall not receive K-3 Reading Improvement
Program money the following year, and an LEA shall terminate any
levy imposed under Section 53A-17a-151.
I. An LEA shall provide data and information for the
USOE's year-end Program report to the Public Education
Appropriations Subcommittee consistent with Section
53A-17a-150(16). LEAs shall report:
(1) progress in meeting gain score goals for
kindergarten, first grade, second grade, and third grade,
including information from the previous five years;
] (b) The report shall include:
(i) the information described in Subsection 53A-17a-150(16)(a) for kindergarten, first grade, second grade, and third grade, including information from the previous five years; and
(ii) the composite scores on the benchmark assessment of students in grades 1 through 3 to the Superintendent:
(A) through UTREx; and
(B) on or before July 1 of each year.
[(2) progress in meeting the state goal of all students at
or above grade level in reading at the end of third grade,
including the previous five years; and
(3) how Program money was expended, by categories of
expenditure.
] [H.](4) An LEA that loses Program money due to a failure to meet
its goal of increasing the percentage of third grade students at
grade level may reapply for the Program money upon submission of a
revised K-3 Reading Improvement Plan after one year of not
receiving Program money.
KEY: reading, improvements , goals
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [August 7, 2013]2015
Notice of Continuation: June 10, 2013
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: Art X Sec 3; 53A-1-401(3); 53A-17a-150(14)(a)
Additional Information
More information about a Notice of Proposed Rule is available online.
The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2015/b20150901.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.
Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([example]). Text to be added is underlined (example). Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.
For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Angela Stallings at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7656, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at angie.stallings@schools.utah.gov. For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Division of Administrative Rules.