Five-Year Notices of Review and Statements of Continuation

Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule. This review is intended to help agencies identify obsolete rules. Upon reviewing a rule, an agency may: repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; continue the rule as it is by filing a Five-Year Notice of Review and Statement of Continuation (Review); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by filing a Review. By filing a Review, the agency indicates that the rule is still necessary.

A Review is not followed by the rule text. The rule text that is being continued may be found in the online edition of the Utah Administrative Code at The rule text may also be inspected at the agency or the Division of Administrative Rules. Reviews are effective upon filing.

Reviews are governed by Section 63G-3-305.