DAR File No. 40192
This rule was published in the March 1, 2016, issue (Vol. 2016, No. 5) of the Utah State Bulletin.
Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission, Administration
Notice of Proposed Rule
DAR File No.: 40192
Filed: 02/03/2016 11:16:48 AM
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
The change relates to comments about judges submitted by members of the public.
Summary of the rule or change:
It lengthens the comment period and articulates which comments will be included in the midterm and retention evaluation cycles. It also deletes the requirement that comments must be based on first-hand experience with the judge.
State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
- Sections 78A-12-101 through 78A-12-207
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
The change has no impact on the state budget because it only changes deadlines for when comments must be submitted and broadens the scope of what kind of comments may be submitted. It does not change the number of judges evaluated, which is the central factor in determining the cost of the evaluations.
The commission has no dealings with local government, so there is no cost or savings to those entities as a result of this change.
The commission has no authority with respect to small businesses and no dealings with small businesses; consequently, there is no impact on such entities.
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:
The only affected persons are the individual members of the public who may choose to submit comments about a judge. There is no cost or savings to them because all they are doing is submitting comments, which has no cost or savings associated with it.
Compliance costs for affected persons:
There is no cost to members of the public if they choose to submit a comment about a judge.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
The amendment has no fiscal impact on businesses.
Joanne Slotnik, Executive Director
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission
Room B-330 SENATE BUILDING
420 N STATE ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114
Direct questions regarding this rule to:
- Joanne Slotnik at the above address, by phone at 801-538-1652, by FAX at 801-538-1024, or by Internet E-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
This rule may become effective on:
John Ashton, Chair
R597. Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission, Administration.
R597-3. Judicial Performance Evaluations.
R597-3-5. Public Comments.
(1) Persons desiring to comment about a
particular judge with whom they have had [
first-hand] experience may do so at any time,
either by submitting such comments on the commission website or by
mailing them to the executive director.
(2) In order for the commission to
consider comments in making its retention recommendation on a
particular judge, comments about that judge must be received no
later than [
1st of the year preceding the election in which the
judge's name appears on the ballot.
Persons submitting comments pursuant to this section must include their full name, address, and telephone number with the submission.
(4) All comments must be based upon first-hand experience
with the judge.]
KEY: judicial performance evaluations, judges, evaluation cycles, surveys
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [
May 27, 2015]
Notice of Continuation: February 17, 2014
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 78A-12
More information about a Notice of Proposed Rule is available online.
The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2016/b20160301.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.
Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([
example]). Text to be added is underlined (). Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.
For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Joanne Slotnik at the above address, by phone at 801-538-1652, by FAX at 801-538-1024, or by Internet E-mail at email@example.com. For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Division of Administrative Rules.