DAR File No. 43399
This rule was published in the December 1, 2018, issue (Vol. 2018, No. 23) of the Utah State Bulletin.
Education, Administration
Rule R277-481
Charter School Oversight, Monitoring and Appeals
Notice of Proposed Rule
(Repeal)
DAR File No.: 43399
Filed: 11/15/2018 03:16:17 PM
RULE ANALYSIS
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
In the 2018 Legislative Session, the Legislature passed H.B. 313. H.B. 313 (2018) made significant amendments to the process charter school authorizers should follow in approving and providing oversight to charter schools. H.B. 313 (2018) also directed the Utah State Board of Education (Board) to make rules to carry out the legislative changes in relation to the oversight of charter schools and their authorizers. Therefore, the Board is repealing R277-481 and adopting new rule R277-553. (EDITOR'S NOTE: New Rule R277-553 can be found in this December 1, 2018, Bulletin under DAR No. 43401.)
Summary of the rule or change:
H.B. 313 (2018) directed the Board to make rules to carry out the legislative changes in relation to the oversight of charter schools and their authorizers. New rule, R277-553, governs charter school oversight by authorizers and includes language from this repealed rule, R277-481.
Statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
- Section 53G-5-305
- Section 53G-5-306
- Section 53G-5-102
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
This rule repeal is not expected to have any fiscal impact on state budget revenues or expenditures as this rule is being eliminated and moved to a new rule.
local governments:
This rule repeal is not expected to have any fiscal impact on local governments' revenues or expenditures as this rule is being eliminated and moved to a new rule.
small businesses:
This rule repeal is not expected to have any fiscal impact on small businessess revenues or expenditures as this rule is being eliminated and moved to a new rule.
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:
This rule repeal is not expected to have any fiscal impact on persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities revenues or expenditures as this rule is being eliminated and moved to a new rule.
Compliance costs for affected persons:
There are no compliance costs for affected persons.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
There are 1,241 entities with a NAICS code 611110 (Elementary and Secondary Schools) operating in Utah according to a "Firm Find Data" search through Utah's Department of Workforce Services. Most of the entities in the list are schools including public schools, charter schools, and private schools. Of the 1,241 entities, there are 15 private businesses, all of which are small businesses (there are no large businesses with a NAICS code 611110). This rule repeal has no fiscal impact on local education agencies and will not have a fiscal impact on large or small businesses. The Assistant Superintendent of Financial Operations at the Utah State Board of Education, Natalie Grange, has reviewed and approved this fiscal analysis.
Sydnee Dickson, State Superintendent
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Office of Administrative Rules, or at:
EducationAdministration
250 E 500 S
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-3272
Direct questions regarding this rule to:
- Angela Stallings at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7550, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
01/02/2019
This rule may become effective on:
01/09/2019
Authorized by:
Angela Stallings, Deputy Superintendent of Policy
RULE TEXT
Appendix 1: Regulatory Impact Summary Table*
Fiscal Costs |
FY 2019 |
FY 2020 |
FY 2021 |
State Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Non-Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Other Person |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Total Fiscal Costs: |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Benefits |
|
|
|
State Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Non-Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Other Persons |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Total Fiscal Benefits: |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
Net Fiscal Benefits: |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
*This table only includes fiscal impacts that could be measured. If there are inestimable fiscal impacts, they will not be included in this table. Inestimable impacts for State Government, Local Government, Small Businesses and Other Persons are described in the narrative. Inestimable impacts for Non-Small Businesses are described in Appendix 2.
Appendix 2: Regulatory Impact to Non-Small Businesses
There are 1,241 entities with a NAICS code 611110 (Elementary and Secondary Schools) operating in Utah according to a "Firm Find Data" search through Utah's Department of Workforce Services. Most of the entities in the list are schools including public schools, charter schools, and private schools. Of the 1,241 entities, there are 15 private businesses, all of which are small businesses (there are no large businesses with a NAICS code 611110). This rule repeal has no fiscal impact on local education agencies and will not have a fiscal impact on large or small businesses.
The Assistant Superintendent of Financial Operations at the Utah State Board of Education, Natalie Grange, has reviewed and approved this fiscal analysis.
[R277. Education, Administration.
R277-481. Charter School Oversight, Monitoring and
Appeals.
R277-481-1. Authority and Purpose.
(1) This rule is authorized under:
(a) Utah Constitution Article X, Section 3 which vests
general control and supervision over public education in the
Board; and
(b) Subsection 53E-3-401(4), which allows the Board to
adopt rules in accordance with its responsibilities.
(2)(a) The purpose of this rule is to establish
procedures for oversight and monitoring charter agreements and
charter schools for compliance with minimum standards.
(b) The rule also provides appeals criteria and a process
for schools found out of compliance with chartering entity
findings.
R277-481-2. Definitions.
(1) "Chartering entities" means entities that
authorize a charter school under Subsection
53G-5-102(3).
(2) "Charter schools" means schools
acknowledged as charter schools by chartering entities under
Sections 53G-5-305, 53G-5-306, and this rule or by the Board
under Section 53G-5-304.
(3)(a) "Charter school agreement" or
"charter agreement" means the terms and conditions for
the operation of an approved charter school.
(b) The charter school agreement shall be maintained by
the Superintendent and is considered the final, official and
complete agreement.
(4) "Charter school deficiencies" means the
following information:
(a) a charter school is not satisfying financial,
academic or operational obligations as required in its charter
agreement;
(b) a charter school is not providing required
documentation after being placed on warning status; or
(c) compelling evidence of fraud or misuse of funds by
charter school governing board members or employees.
(i) Fraud or misuse of funds need not rise to the minimal
standard.
(ii) Fraud or misuse of funds may include
(A) failure to properly account for funds received at the
school;
(B) failure to follow regularly established accounting
and receipting practices; or
(C) failure to provide data, financial records, or
information as requested by the State Charter School Board or the
Board.
(5) "Charter school governing board" means the
board designated by the charter school to make decisions for the
operation of the school.
(6) "Probation" means a formal process and time
period during which a school is permitted to demonstrate its full
compliance with its charter agreement and all applicable laws,
rules and regulations.
(7) "State Charter School Board" means the
board designated in Section 53G-5-201.
(8) "Warning status" means an informal status
in which a school is placed through written notification from the
the school's authorizer for the school's failure to
maintain compliance with its charter agreement, applicable laws,
rules or regulations.
R277-481-3. State Charter School Board Oversight, Minimum
Standards, and Consequences.
(1) The State Charter School Board shall provide direct
oversight to the charter schools for which it is the chartering
entity, including requiring all charter schools to:
(a) comply with their charter agreements containing clear
and meaningful expectations for measuring charter school
quality.
(b) annually review charter agreements, as maintained by
the Superintendent;
(c) regularly review other matters specific to effective
charter school operations, including a comprehensive review of
governing board performance at least once every five years;
and
(d) audit and investigate claims of fraud or misuse of
public assets or funds.
(2) All charter schools authorized by the State Charter
School Board shall also meet the following minimum
standards:
(a) charter schools shall have no unresolved material
findings, financial condition findings or repeat significant
findings in the school's independent financial audit, federal
single audit or Board audits;
(b) charter schools shall maintain a minimum of 30 days
cash on hand or the cash or other reserve amount required in bond
covenants, whichever is greater;
(c) charter schools shall have no violations of federal
or state law or regulation, Board rules or Board
directives;
(d) charter schools shall have all teachers properly
licensed and endorsed for teaching assignments in CACTUS;
and
(e) charter school governing boards shall ensure all
employees and board members have criminal background checks on
file.
(3)(a) A charter school that fails to meet any of the
minimum standards or a significant number of performance
standards may be placed on warning status and notified in writing
by the school's authorizer.
(b) While a school is on warning status, the school may
seek technical assistance from the school's authorizer to
remedy any deficiencies.
(4)(a) If any minimum standard or a significant number of
performance standards has not been met by an assigned date
following designation of warning status, the State Charter School
Board shall notify the school in writing of the specific minimum
standard(s) the school did not meet.
(b) Based on the State Charter School Board's review
of the charter school's noncompliance, progress and response
to technical assistance, the State Charter School Board may place
the school on probation for up to one calendar year following the
designation of warning status.
(c)(i) Upon placing a school on probation, the State
Charter School Board shall set forth a written plan outlining
those provisions in the charter agreement, applicable laws, rules
and regulations with which the school is not in full
compliance.
(ii) This written plan shall set forth the terms and
conditions and the timeline that the school shall follow in order
to be removed from probation.
(d) If the school complies with the written plan in a
timely manner, the State Charter School Board shall remove the
school from probation.
(e)(i) While a school is on probation, it shall be
required to satisfy certain requirements and conditions set forth
by the State Charter School Board.
(ii) If the school fails to satisfy specific requirements
and conditions by a date established by the State Charter School
Board, the State Charter School Board may terminate the
school's charter.
(f) While a school is on probation, the school may seek
technical assistance from the State Charter School Board staff to
remedy any deficiencies.
(g) The State Charter School Board may, for good cause,
or if the health, safety, or welfare of the students at the
school is threatened at any time during the probationary period,
terminate the charter immediately.
R277-481-4. Charter School Governing Board Compliance with
Law.
(1) The Board may review or terminate the charter based
upon factors that may include:
(a) failure to meet measures of charter school quality
which includes adherence to a charter agreement required and
monitored by chartering entities; or
(b) charter school deficiencies; or
(c) failure of the charter school to comply with federal
or state law or regulation, Board rules, or Board
directives.
(2) If a charter school's charter conflicts with
applicable federal or state law or rule, the charter shall be
interpreted to require compliance with such law or rule; all
other provisions of the school's charter shall remain in full
force and effect.
(3) A charter school governing board may amend its
charter agreement by receiving approval from its chartering
entity consistent with Section 53G-5-303.
(4) Chartering entities shall obtain approval by the
Board before amending charter agreements specific to:
(a) changes to mission and purpose;
(b) waivers from Board administrative rule;
(c) expansions of student enrollment;
(d) expansions of grade levels that will put students in
different weighted pupil unit grade level categories;
and
(e) revolving loans.
(5) A charter school shall notify the Board and the
chartering entity of any and all lawsuits filed against the
charter school within 30 days of the filing of the
lawsuit.
R277-481-5. Chartering Entity Oversight and Monitoring.
(1) Local school board and institutions of higher
education chartering entities shall:
(a) visit a charter school at least once during its first
year of operation in order to ensure adherence to and
implementation of approved charter and to finalize a review
process;
(b) visit a charter school as determined in the review
process;
(c) provide written reports to a charter school after the
visits that set forth strengths, deficiencies, corrective
actions, timelines and the reason for charter termination, if
applicable; and
(d) audit and investigate claims of fraud or misuse of
public assets or funds.
(2) Chartering entities shall notify the Board within 20
days of charter school deficiencies that initiate corrective
action by chartering entities.
R277-481-6. Charter School Financial Practices and
Training.
(1) Charter school business administrators shall attend
business meetings required by the school's
authorizer.
(2) Charter school governing board members and school
administrators shall be invited to all appropriate
Board-sponsored training, meetings, and sessions for traditional
school district financial personnel.
(3) The Board shall work with other education agencies to
encourage their inclusion of charter school representatives at
training and professional development sessions.
(4)(a) A charter school shall appoint a business
administrator consistent with Sections 53G-4-302 through
53G-4-303.
(b) The business administrator shall be responsible for
the submission of all financial and statistical information
required by the Board.
(5) The Board may interrupt disbursements to charter
schools for failure to comply with financial and statistical
information required by law or Board rules.
(6) Charter schools shall comply with the Utah State
Procurement Code, Title 63G, Chapter 6.
(7) Charter schools are not eligible for necessarily
existent small schools funding under Subsection 53F-2-304(2) and
Rule R277-445.
R277-481-7. Remedying Charter School Financial
Deficiencies.
(1) Upon receiving credible information of charter school
deficiencies, the chartering entity shall immediately direct an
independent review or audit through the charter school governing
board.
(2) The chartering entity or the Board through the
chartering entity may direct a charter school governing board or
the charter school administration to take reasonable action to
protect state or federal funds consistent with Section
53G-5-503.
(3) The chartering entity or the Board may:
(a) allow a charter school governing board to hold a
hearing to determine financial responsibility and assist the
charter school governing board with the hearing process;
(b) immediately terminate the flow of state
funds;
(c) recommend cessation of federal funding to the
school;
(d) take immediate or subsequent corrective action with
employees who are responsible for charter school deficiencies
consistent with Section 53A-1a-509; or
(e) any combination of the foregoing Subsections (3)(a)
through (d).
(4) The recommendation by the chartering entity shall be
made within 20 school days of receipt of complaint of
deficiency(ies).
(5) The chartering entity may exercise flexibility for
good cause in making recommendation(s) regarding
deficiency(ies).
(6) The Board shall consider and affirm or modify the
chartering entity's recommendation(s) for remedying a charter
school's deficiency(ies) within 60 days of receipt of
information from the chartering entity.
(7) In addition to remedies provided for in Section
53G-5-501, the chartering entity may provide for a remediation
team to work with the school.
R277-481-8. Appeals Criteria and Procedures.
(1) Only an operating charter school, a charter school
that has been recommended for approval to the Board, or a charter
school applicant that has met State Charter School Board
requirements for review by the full State Charter School Board,
may appeal chartering entity administrative decisions or
recommendations to the Board.
(2) The following chartering entity administrative
decisions may be appealed to the Board:
(a) termination of a charter;
(b) denial of proposed amendments to charter
agreement;
(c) denial or withholding of funds from charter school
governing boards; and
(d) denial of a charter.
(3) The chartering entity shall, upon taking any of the
administrative actions:
(a) provide written notice of denial to the charter
school or approved charter school;
(b) provide written notice of appeal rights and timelines
to the charter school governing board chair or authorized agent;
and
(c) post information about the appeals process on its
website and provide training to charter school governing board
members and authorized agents regarding the appeals
procedure.
(4) A charter school governing board chair or authorized
agent (appellant) may submit a written appeal to the
Superintendent within 14 calendar days of the chartering entity
administrative action under Subsection (3).
(5)(a) The Superintendent shall, in consultation with
Board Leadership, review the written appeal and determine if the
appeal addresses an administrative decision by a chartering
entity.
(b) If the Superintendent and Board Leadership determine
that the appeal is appropriate, Board Leadership shall designate
three to five Board members and a hearing officer, who is not a
Board member, to act as an objective hearing panel.
(c) The hearing officer, in consultation with the
Superintendent, shall set a hearing date and provide notice to
all parties, including the chartering entity and staff.
(d) The Hearing shall be held no more than 45 days
following receipt of the written appeal.
(e) The hearing officer shall establish procedures that
provide fairness for all parties, which may include:
(i) a request for parties to provide a written
explanation of the appeal and related information and
evidence;
(ii) a determination of time limits and scope of
testimony and witnesses;
(iii) a determination for recording the hearing;
(iv) preliminary decisions about evidence; and
(v) decisions about representation of parties.
(6) The hearing panel shall make written findings and
provide an appeal recommendation to the Board no more than 10
calendar days following the hearing.
(7) The Board shall take action on the hearing report
findings at the next regularly scheduled Board meeting.
(8) The recommendation of the chartering entity shall be
in place pending the conclusion of the appeals process, unless
the Superintendent in his sole discretion, determines that the
chartering entity's recommendation or failure to act presents
a serious threat to students or an imminent threat to public
property or resources.
(9) All parties shall work to schedule and conclude
hearings as fairly and expeditiously as possible.
(10) The Board's acceptance or rejection of the
hearing report is the final administrative action on the
issue.
KEY: charter schools, oversight, monitoring, appeals
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: Augustt 7,
2018
Notice of Continuation: July 13, 2018
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: Art X Sec 3;
53E-3-401(4); 53G-5
]
Additional Information
More information about a Notice of Proposed Rule is available online.
The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull_pdf/2018/b20181201.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.
Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([example]). Text to be added is underlined (example). Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.
For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Angela Stallings at the above address, by phone at 801-538-7550, by FAX at 801-538-7768, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]. For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Office of Administrative Rules.