DAR File No. 43653
This rule was published in the May 1, 2019, issue (Vol. 2019, No. 9) of the Utah State Bulletin.
Insurance, Administration
Rule R590-218
Permitted Language for Reservation of Discretion Clauses
Notice of Proposed Rule
(Repeal)
DAR File No.: 43653
Filed: 04/15/2019 04:08:06 PM
RULE ANALYSIS
Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:
During the 2018 General Session, the Legislature passed S.B. 135, Insurance Contracts Amendments, which prohibits discretionary clauses in certain insurance contracts as set forth in Section 31A-21-314. The revision makes this regulation obsolete.
Summary of the rule or change:
This change repeals the rule because S.B. 135 passed during the 2018 General Session prohibits discretionary clauses in certain insurance contracts as set forth in Section 31A-21-314. That change makes this regulation obsolete. This rule is repealed in its entirety.
Statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:
- Subsection 31A-21-201(3)
- Subsection 31A-2-201(1)
- Subsection 31A-2-201(3)(a)
- Subsection 31A-21-314(2)
Anticipated cost or savings to:
the state budget:
There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. The repeal of this rule requires no action or compliance by any persons.
local governments:
There is no anticipated cost or savings to local governments. The repeal of this rule requires no action or compliance by any persons.
small businesses:
There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. The repeal of this rule requires no action or compliance by any persons.
persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:
There is no anticipated cost or savings to other persons. The repeal of this rule requires no action or compliance by any other persons.
Compliance costs for affected persons:
There are no compliance costs for any affected persons. The repeal of this rule requires no action or compliance of any sort by any persons.
Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:
After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that this rule repeal will not result in a fiscal impact to businesses.
Todd E. Kiser, Commissioner
The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Office of Administrative Rules, or at:
InsuranceAdministration
Room 3110 STATE OFFICE BLDG
450 N MAIN ST
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-1201
Direct questions regarding this rule to:
- Steve Gooch at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]
Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:
05/31/2019
This rule may become effective on:
06/07/2019
Authorized by:
Steve Gooch, Information Specialist
RULE TEXT
Appendix 1: Regulatory Impact Summary Table*
Fiscal Costs |
FY 2019 |
FY 2020 |
FY 2021 |
State Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Non-Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Other Person |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Total Fiscal Costs: |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Benefits |
|
|
|
State Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Local Government |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Non-Small Businesses |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Other Persons |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Total Fiscal Benefits: |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
Net Fiscal Benefits: |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
*This table only includes fiscal impacts that could be measured. If there are inestimable fiscal impacts, they will not be included in this table. Inestimable impacts for State Government, Local Government, Small Businesses and Other Persons are described in the narrative. Inestimable impacts for Non - Small Businesses are described in Appendix 2.
Appendix 2: Regulatory Impact to Non - Small Businesses
This repeal is not expected to have any fiscal impacts on non-small businesses revenues or expenditures, because the repeal of this rule requires no action or compliance by any persons. During the 2018 General Session, the Legislature passed S.B. 135 which prohibits discretionary clauses in certain insurance contracts as set forth in 31A-21-314. The revision makes this regulation obsolete.
The head of the Insurance Department, Todd E. Kiser, has reviewed and approved this fiscal analysis.
R590. Insurance, Administration.
[R590-218. Permitted Language for Reservation of Discretion
Clauses.
R590-218-1. Authority.
This rule is promulgated pursuant to Subsections
31A-2-201(1) and 31A-2-201(3)(a) in which the commissioner is
empowered to administer and enforce this title and to make rules
to implement the provisions of this title. Further authority to
regulate the use of reservation of discretion clauses in forms
filed by insurers with the department is found in Subsections
31A-21-201(3) and 31A-21-314(2).
R590-218-2. Purpose.
This rule prohibits the use of reservation of discretion
clauses in forms that are not associated with ERISA employee
benefit plans. It creates a safe harbor for insurance companies
that provide insurance to ERISA employee benefit plans sponsored
by employers, allowing insurers to know what language in
insurance forms is acceptable to the department.
R590-218-3. Applicability.
This rule applies to all forms filed with the department,
regardless of the insurance line or type of form.
R590-218-4. Definitions.
For the purpose of this rule the commissioner adopts the
definitions set forth in Section 31A-1-301 and the
following:
(1) "Employee benefit plan" means an employee
welfare benefit plan as defined in 29 U.S.C. 1002(1) or an
employee pension benefit plan as defined in 29 U.S.C. 1002(2) or
a plan which is both an employee welfare benefit plan and an
employee pension benefit plan.
(2) "ERISA" means the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974.
(3) "ERISA employee benefit plan" means an
employee benefit plan subject to ERISA.
(4) "Form" is used as defined in Section
31A-1-301.
(5) "Reservation of discretion clause" means
language in a form that purports to reserve discretion to
interpret the terms of the contract, to determine eligibility for
benefits under the plan, or to establish a scope of judicial
review or standards of interpretation, to the plan administrator,
the insurance company acting in the capacity of a plan
administrator in an employee benefit plan, or the insurance
company acting as the insurer.
R590-218-5. Reservation of Discretion Clauses Prohibited -
Exception - Safe Harbor Language.
(1) The commissioner finds reservation of discretion
clauses in forms to be in violation of Subsections 31A-21-201(3)
and 31A-21-314(2). Accordingly, such clauses are not permitted in
a form unless provided otherwise by this rule. Any reservation of
discretion language previously accepted or approved by the
department is hereby prohibited. Any use of reservation of
discretion clause in a form required to be filed with the
department is a violation of Subsections 31A-21-201(3) and
31A-21-314(2) and is prohibited, regardless of whether the form
has been filed with or prohibited by the department.
(2) Notwithstanding Subsection (1), a reservation of
discretion clause may be included in a form if the form is used
only in ERISA employee benefit plans and the reservation of
discretion clause has language that is the same as, or
substantially similar to, the language in Subsection
(3).
(3) The following language may be used in a reservation
of discretion clause in forms filed for use in ERISA employee
benefit plans (Parenthesis indicate that the company filing the
form may use a name or pronouns as applicable):
"Benefits under this plan will be paid only if (the
plan administrator) decides in its discretion that (the claimant)
is entitled to them. (The plan administrator) also has discretion
to determine eligibility for benefits and to interpret the terms
and conditions of the benefit plan. Determinations made by (the
plan administrator) pursuant to this reservation of discretion do
not prohibit or prevent a claimant from seeking judicial review
in federal court of (the plan administrator's)
determinations.
The reservation of discretion made under this provision
only establishes the scope of review that a federal court will
apply when (a claimant) seeks judicial review of (the plan
administrator's) determination of eligibility for benefits,
the payment of benefits, or interpretation of the terms and
conditions applicable to the benefit plan.
(The plan administrator) is an insurance company that
provides insurance to this benefit plan and the federal court
will determine the level of discretion that it will accord (the
plan administrator's) determinations."
(4) A reservation of discretion clause in a form that is
used in an ERISA employee benefit plan must be highlighted in the
form by use of a bold font that is not less than 12 point
type.
R590-218-6. Filing Procedures.
Rather than filing multiple forms for ERISA employee
benefit plans and benefit plans not subject to ERISA, an insurer
may elect to file one form with the department that has the
reservation of discretion language included as a variable
element, between brackets, with an accompanying notation stating
that the reservation of discretion language will only be included
in forms used for ERISA employee benefit plans.
R590-218-7. Severability.
If any provision or clause of this rule or its
application to any person or situation is held invalid, such
invalidity may not affect any other provision or application of
this rule which can be given effect without the invalid provision
or application, and to this end the provisions of this rule are
declared to be severable
KEY: insurance, discretion clauses
Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: March 21,
2003
Notice of Continuation: January 4, 2018
Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 31A-2-201;
31A-21-201; 31A-21-314
]
Additional Information
More information about a Notice of Proposed Rule is available online.
The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull_pdf/2019/b20190501.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.
Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets ([example]). Text to be added is underlined (example). Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.
For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Steve Gooch at the above address, by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]. For questions about the rulemaking process, please contact the Office of Administrative Rules.