Utah Administrative Code
The Utah Administrative Code is the body of all effective administrative rules as compiled and organized by the Division of Administrative Rules (see Subsection 63G-3-102(5); see also Sections 63G-3-701 and 702).
NOTE: For a list of rules that have been made effective since January 1, 2020, please see the codification segue page.
NOTE TO RULEFILING AGENCIES: Use the RTF version for submitting rule changes.
R907. Transportation, Administration.
Rule R907-65. Compensation Schedule for Longitudinal Access to Interstate Highway Rights-of-Way for Installation of Telecommunications Facilities.
As in effect on January 1, 2020
Table of Contents
- R907-65-1. Purpose.
- R907-65-2. Authority.
- R907-65-3. Background.
- R907-65-4. Definitions.
- R907-65-5. Compensation Zones.
- R907-65-6. Land Values.
- R907-65-7. Rate of Return.
- R907-65-8. Base Compensation Schedule.
- R907-65-9. Compensation for Use of Department Conduit.
- R907-65-10. Adjustments to Base Compensation Schedule for Annual Payments.
- R907-65-11. Compensation Prior to Construction of Telecommunications Facilities.
- R907-65-12. Lump Sum Monetary Compensation.
- R907-65-13. In-Kind Compensation.
- R907-65-14. Multiple Providers in Same Trench.
- Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment
- Notice of Continuation
- Authorizing, Implemented, or Interpreted Law
The purpose of this rule is to implement a compensation schedule for longitudinal access to the rights-of-way of the interstate system for installation and operation of telecommunications facilities. This Rule establishes the methodology and schedules for charging compensation in accordance with Subsection 72-7-108(3)(b). Subsection 72-7-108(3)(b) requires that the compensation be:
fair and reasonable;
open to public inspection;
established to promote access by multiple telecommunication facility providers;
established for zones of the state, with zones determined based upon factors that include population density, distance, numbers of telecommunication subscribers, and the impact upon private right-of-way users;
established to encourage the deployment of digital infrastructure within the state.
Subsection 72-7-108(3)(c) states that the department shall establish a schedule of rates of compensation for longitudinal access granted under that section, and shall do so beginning October 1, 1999, and in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act.
The department has conducted an analysis of right-of-way values for the interstate system using current market data on (1) Utah real property values differentiated by location (northern Utah (Salt Lake City/surrounding counties), central Utah (Provo/surrounding counties), and southern Utah (Cedar City/St. George/surrounding counties), population density (urban, rural) and land use (residential, commercial, industrial, agriculture) and (2) appraisal values from department land acquisitions. These data were applied to fifteen right-of-way segments of the interstate system that the department defined based on various factors, including but not limited to location, similarity of land use, population density and number of telecommunications subscribers. Segment land values were then calculated based on the relevant "across-the-fence" property values and the following core assumptions:
Land needed for longitudinal installations of telecommunications facilities, including a buffer zone, will generally be 6 feet in width.
Values for preassembled right-of-way for longitudinal access are 200% of values for non-assembled right-of-way.
Values for underground use of right-of-way for longitudinal access are 50% of values for ground level and aboveground use.
Upper and lower bound real property values establish a valuation range for each segment. Point estimates of segment land values are calculated at the 30th percentile within this range.
Segment land values (reported in $/ft2) are converted to $/mile using the following formula:
Segment land value ($/mile) = Segment land value ($/ft2) x 5,280 ft/mile x easement width (6 ft).
The fifteen segments were then grouped into five zones based on similarities in segment attributes and values. For example, the rural segments of I-15, I-70 and I-84 were grouped to create zone 1, while the urban segment of I-15 traversing Salt Lake City was grouped with I-215 to create zone 5. Similar groupings make up zones 2, 3 and 4. Through this process, the department defined five zones with a weighted average land value for each zone.
The department then determined annual lease valuation, as a rate of return on the land values for each zone, using current market data. The department determined that a 10% annual rate of return on investment represents a fair and reasonable compensation rate in current market conditions.
The department also received and considered recommendations on rates of compensation from the Utility in Highway Rights-of-Way Task Force pursuant to Section 6(2)(a) of S. B. 150.
The definitions of terms in R907-64-3 apply to the same terms used in this Rule. This Rule uses the following additional defined terms:
(1) "Land value" means the fair market value of land within the right-of-way of the interstate system as determined by the department under the core assumptions set forth in R907-65-3 and established for compensation purposes under R907-65-6.
(2) "Rate of return" means the annual rate of return on investment, using land value, as determined by the department and established for compensation purposes under R907-65-7.
(3) "Zone" means a group of right-of-way segments of the interstate system as determined by the department and established for compensation purposes under R907-65-5.
(1) Five zones of the State are established for purposes of determining land values and compensation rates for longitudinal access to the right-of-way of the interstate system.
(2) The five zones are:
Zone 1 - Segments traversing primarily rural, agricultural areas with low population density. The two primary segments in this zone are located south of Provo, extending to Arizona along I-15 and to Colorado along I-70. This zone also includes shorter segments of I-80 and I-84 bounded by the Wyoming and Nevada State lines respectively. Approximately 90% of this zone borders agricultural land.
Zone 2 - Segments traversing primarily sub-rural areas with low population density. Segments in this zone are located in the north-central, north-eastern and north-western regions of the State. Land usage is primarily agricultural (approximately 75%), with light pockets of industrial, commercial, and residential land usage.
Zone 3 - Segments traversing sub-rural/suburban land around the State's metropolitan areas with medium population density. Segments in this zone are located outside the Salt Lake City metropolitan area. Land usage is mixed; while agriculture still makes up the largest proportion of land usage, about one-third of the land is residential, and slightly less than one-third is commercial and industrial.
Zone 4 - Segments traversing suburban/urban areas with medium/high population density. Segments in this zone run on a north-south route on I-15 through the Salt Lake City metropolitan area. Land usage in this zone is mixed, with the greatest proportion categorized as industrial, followed by residential, then commercial, and small pockets of agricultural usage.
Zone 5 - Segments traversing the densely populated urban areas. Segments in this zone are located in and around Salt Lake City. Nearly half is categorized as residential, and the rest is split between industrial and commercial usage, with very small pockets of agricultural usage.
(3) The existing right-of-way of the interstate system is placed into the five zones as set forth in Table 1. Whenever new right-of-way is added to the interstate system, the department shall modify Table 1 to classify the new right-of-way into the applicable zone or zones and publish the modified Table 1.
(4) At least once every five years the department shall conduct an analysis to determine changes, if any, in the boundaries of zones based on demographic and market data, including but not limited to data on similarity of surrounding land uses, population density, distances and number of telecommunications subscribers. The department shall publish a modification to Table 1 whenever zone boundaries are changed.
TABLE 1 Compensation Zones Reference Post Zone/Segment (from -- to) Mileage Zone 1 575 I-15: Payson South Int. to Arizona 252 -- 0 252 I-84: Tremonton to Idaho 43 -- 0 43 I-80: Wyoming to Silver Creek Int. 198 -- 148 50 I-70: Entire Route 0 -- 230 230 Zone 2 212 I-15: Idaho to Weber-Box Elder Co. Line 404 -- 354 50 I-15: Springville Int. to Payson South Int. 263 -- 252 11 I-84: Echo to SR-89 120 -- 88 32 I-84: SR-89 to I-15 88 -- 81 7 I-80: Magna Int. to Nevada 112 -- 0 112 Zone 3 50 I-15: Weber-Box Elder Co. Line to Parish Lane Int. 354 -- 323 31 I-80: Silver Creek Int. to Mouth of Parley's Canyon 148 -- 129 19 Zone 4 60 I-15: Parish Lane Int. to Salt Lake-Utah Co. Line 323 -- 288 35 I-15: Salt Lake-Utah Co. Line to Springville Int. 288 -- 263 25 Zone 5 47 I-80: Mouth of Parley's Canyon to Magna Int. 129 -- 112 17 I-215: Entire Route 0 -- 30 30
(1) Land values for longitudinal access for telecommunications facilities are established, by zone, as set forth in Table 2. Whenever new right-of-way is added to the interstate system and a zone or zones are established for such new right-of-way under R907-65-5(3), the land value for such zone or zones set forth in Table 2 shall apply to such new right-of-way.
(2) At least once every five years, the department shall conduct a market analysis to determine the fair and reasonable values of the right-of-way of the interstate system for longitudinal access for telecommunications facilities. The department shall determine this value for each zone. The department shall publish a modification to Table 2 whenever the department completes a market analysis and determines that values of the right-of-way have changed.
(3) In determining land values, the department shall disregard any circumstance in which the department's interstate right-of-way is the only viable alternative for installing and operating telecommunications facilities between relevant geographic markets. The department shall adjust such values to those which would exist if another viable alternative existed for installing and operating comparable telecommunications facilities such that the department would not possess monopolistic market power in the subject location.
TABLE 2 Land Values ($/mile) Zone Miles in Zone Weighted Average Land Value Zone 1 575 $8,000 Zone 2 212 $22,000 Zone 3 50 $48,000 Zone 4 60 $80,000 Zone 5 47 $124,000
(1) An annual rate of return on land value of 10% is established for purposes of determining annual compensation rates for longitudinal access to the right-of-way of the interstate system.
(2) At least once every five years the department shall conduct an analysis to determine changes, if any, in the rate of return based on market data. The department shall publish a modification to the rate of return whenever the department completes a market analysis and determines that market rate of return has changed.
(1) The department shall charge compensation for longitudinal access for telecommunications facilities so that the department receives, on an annual basis, the rate of return on the value of land in each zone established under this Rule which is utilized for overhead, surface or underground installations of telecommunications facilities, subject to adjustment under R907-65-10 and potential discount under R907-65-11.
(2) The compensation charged shall be set forth in the agreement between the department and the telecommunications facility provider pursuant to R907-64.
(3) The annual compensation to be paid by each telecommunications facility provider which enters into an agreement with the department for longitudinal access shall be determined under the following formulas:
Land values by zone are translated into annual compensation rates ($/mile) using the following formula:
Annual compensation rate per zone ($/mile) = zonal land value ($/mile)(from Table 2) x rate of return (currently 10%)
Total annual compensation shall then be calculated as follows:
Total annual compensation per zone = annual compensation rate per zone ($/mile) x # of miles accessed.
For telecommunications facility providers seeking a route that accesses multiple zones, the above calculations shall be made for each zone then summed to calculate total annual compensation for the requested access route.
(1) The land values set forth in Table 2 (and therefore the annual base compensation amounts) do not include the value of any spare conduit which the department owns. The department is authorized to offer use of and access to its spare conduit to telecommunications facility providers, provided the department determines the spare conduit is not and will not be needed for highway purposes and the department receives additional compensation for the use of and access to the spare conduit.
(2) Such additional compensation shall be fair and reasonable to the department and the telecommunications facility provider and shall be charged in a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory manner to all similarly situated telecommunications facility providers. The department shall establish the amount of compensation for use of and access to the department's spare conduit by zone.
(3) Such additional compensation shall be subject to adjustment annually in the same manner as provided in R907-65-10.
(4) At least once every five years the department shall conduct an analysis to determine changes, if any, in the value of its spare conduit. Whenever the department completes a market analysis and determines that value of its spare conduit has changed, the department shall apply its new values to each agreement thereafter executed by the department.
(1) The base compensation schedule for each calendar year after a year in which the department determines land values under R907-65-6 shall be adjusted effective January 1 of each such calendar year (each an "adjustment date"). The adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying the base compensation amount for the immediately preceding calendar year by a fraction. The numerator of the fraction shall be the "All Items, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the West (1982-84=100)," reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS), published for the month of September immediately preceding the adjustment date in question. The denominator of the fraction shall be such index published for the next preceding month of September. The adjustment may result in an increase or decrease in the base compensation schedule.
(2) If the methodology for determining the index is changed by the issuer of the index, the department shall convert the index in accordance with the conversion factor published by the issuer of the index. If the index is discontinued or changed so that it is not practical to obtain a continuous measurement of price changes, the department shall replace the index with a comparable governmental index and apply the index chosen to all agreements which require annual adjustment to the base compensation.
(3) Except as provided in R907-65-11, each agreement for longitudinal access to the right-of-way of the interstate system with telecommunications facilities providers shall require that the rates of compensation during the first calendar year of the term of the agreement equal the base compensation schedule determined for that calendar year under this Rule (prorated if the term begins after January 1), taking into account any adjustments under R907-65-10(1).
(4) Except as provided in R907-65-11, each agreement for longitudinal access to the right-of-way of the interstate system with telecommunications facilities providers shall require an adjustment in the annual base compensation effective January 1 of each subsequent calendar year of the term (prorated for the last year of the term if it ends before December 31). The adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying the base compensation amount for the immediately preceding calendar year (annualized for partial calendar years during the term) by the fraction described in R907-65-10(1).
(5) It is the intent of this Rule that revisions to the base compensation schedule resulting from re-analysis of market conditions by the department pursuant to R907-65-5(4), R907-65-6(3), R907-65-7(2) and R907-65-9(4) shall apply only to agreements executed after the department completes and issues its revisions, and shall not apply to agreements executed prior to the revision. It also is the intent of this Rule that annual adjustments to the base compensation schedule due to inflation or deflation pursuant to R907-65-10(1) shall apply to every agreement under which annual compensation payments are required.
(1) The department may charge compensation for the period of time between execution of the agreement and completion of construction at rates which are discounted from the full annual compensation rates determined under R907-65-8, R907-65-9 and R907-65-10 including no compensation prior to commencement of construction. The department also may agree to the phasing of projects into clearly identified phases, with the compensation schedule structured based on the construction commencement and/or completion dates for each phase.
(2) If the department elects to discount compensation rates, it shall do so in a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory manner for all similarly situated telecommunication facility providers.
(1) The department is authorized to enter into agreements for longitudinal access to the right-of-way of the interstate system with telecommunications facility providers which offer, in lieu of annual compensation, one or more lump sum payments of monetary compensation. The agreement shall set forth the lump sum payment or payments due.
(2) Lump sum payments shall be calculated to be equivalent, on a present value basis, to annual compensation payments which would be required under R907-65-8, R907-65-9, R-907-65-10 and R907-65-11 over the same time period as that covered by each lump sum payment.
(3) For purposes of determining lump sum monetary compensation for longitudinal access to the right-of-way of the interstate system, the department shall use a discount rate equal to the yield (in percent per annum) on Moody's seasoned Aaa Corporate Bonds, as reported by the Federal Reserve Board through the Federal Reserve Statistical Release. The yield on Moody's Aaa Corporate Bonds reported for the first full month immediately prior to the date an agreement for lump sum monetary compensation is executed by the department shall be the discount rate applied for purposes of determining the amount of such lump sum monetary compensation.
(4) Each telecommunications facility provider which is to pay monetary compensation shall have the right to choose whether to pay it in one lump sum determined according to this Rule R907-65-12 or to pay it in annual installments. Unless the department otherwise agrees in writing, this choice shall be made before the agreement is signed, and the agreement shall set forth the choice made.
(1) The department is authorized to enter into agreements for longitudinal access to the right-of-way of the interstate system with telecommunications facility providers which offer, in lieu of or in addition to monetary compensation, in-kind compensation. In-kind compensation may include, without limitation, delivery to the department for its own uses and purposes of conduit, innerduct, dark fiber, access points, telecommunications equipment, telecommunications services, bandwidth and other telecommunications facilities. The agreement shall set forth the in-kind compensation.
(2) The department shall determine the present value of the in-kind compensation according to the methods set forth in R907-65-12. The department shall prepare an analysis setting forth its valuation at or before the time it executes the agreement. The valuation analysis need not be included in the agreement.
(3) The department shall value the in-kind compensation as follows:
(a) Facilities for Department Use Only. Electronic equipment, conduit, fiber and other telecommunications hardware and software contributed to the department shall be valued on a present value basis at the estimated, reasonable cost to the telecommunications facility provider of procuring and installing the same.
(b) Joint Trenching. The present value of the estimated, reasonable cost to the telecommunications facility provider of joint trenching for placing conduit, fiber and other facilities of both the provider (and its customers) and the department shall be proportionately allocated to the department as a component of the present value of the in-kind compensation. The proportion allocated to the department shall equal the total estimated, reasonable cost of the trenching work multiplied by a fraction. The numerator of the fraction shall equal the amount of conduit and innerduct space to be contributed to the department under the agreement. The denominator of the fraction shall equal the total amount of conduit space the telecommunications facility provider is authorized to install under the agreement. Single duct conduit space shall be measured using the planned diameter of the conduit. Multi-duct conduit space shall be measured by summing the planned diameters of each innerduct in the conduit.
(c) Other Jointly Used Facilities. The present value of the estimated, reasonable cost to the telecommunications facility provider of providing any other telecommunications facility which is shared jointly by the provider and the department shall be proportionately allocated to the department as a component of the present value of the in-kind compensation. The department shall determine the proportion to be allocated to the department based on the percentage of use or benefit to which each party will be entitled under the agreement.
(d) Warranties; Maintenance and Operating Covenants. The department shall determine the present value of equipment warranties, warranties of conduit, fiber or other components, software warranties, maintenance covenants and operating covenants based on the reasonable, estimated cost of purchasing such warranties, maintenance and operating contracts from manufacturers or other third parties (if not already included in the cost to purchase the equipment, conduit, fiber, other components or software).
(e) Summation of In-Kind Values. The total present value of the in-kind compensation shall be the sum of the present values determined under subsections (a) through (d) above.
(4) The department shall require annual or lump sum monetary compensation (determined according to the methods set forth in R907-65-12), in addition to the in-kind compensation, if the present value of the in-kind compensation is less than the present value of the annual monetary compensation the department would require over the term of the agreement under R907-65-8, R907-65-9, R907-65-10 and R907-65-11. The amount of the annual or lump sum monetary compensation shall be the difference in such present values.
(5) The department may accept in-kind compensation with a present value in excess of the present value of annual monetary compensation payments which would be required under R907-65-8, R907-65-9, R907-65-10 and R907-65-11 if the telecommunications facility provider consents in writing and gives a written waiver and release of all claims and protections arising under federal or Utah law by reason of such excess value. The waiver and release shall be in form approved by the director.
(6) Before entering into an in-kind compensation agreement, the department shall obtain from the telecommunications facility provider its valuations of the in-kind compensation. The telecommunications facility provider may provide the department information on its costs in order to assist the department in determining in-kind compensation value. The department shall reasonably consider such valuation and cost information in making its determination, but is not bound by the valuation or cost information submitted.
(1) If the department enters into an agreement with two or more telecommunications facility providers, or with a consortium or other entity whose members, partners, venturers or other participants are two or more telecommunications facility providers, or if the department requires two or more telecommunications facility providers to share a single trench, then the agreement(s) shall require that the telecommunications facility providers share the burden of the compensation owing to the department under the agreement(s) on a fair, reasonable and equitable basis, taking into consideration the proportionate uses and benefits to be derived by each telecommunications facility provider from the trench, conduits and other telecommunications facilities to be installed under the agreement(s).
(2) The foregoing does not limit the right of the department to require all the participating telecommunications facility providers to bear joint and several liability for the obligations owing to the department under the agreement(s).
(3) Any agreement which requires sharing of the burden of compensation owing to the department shall provide the department the right to review and audit the books, records and contracts of or among the participating telecommunications facility providers to determine compliance or lack of compliance with R907-65-14(1).
right-of-way, interstate highway system
November 16, 1999
August 27, 2018
For questions regarding the content or application of rules under Title R907, please contact the promulgating agency (Transportation, Administration). A list of agencies with links to their homepages is available at http://www.utah.gov/government/agencylist.html or from http://www.rules.utah.gov/contact/agencycontacts.htm.