---------------------------- Utah State Digest, Vol. 2017, No. 9 (May 1, 2017) ------------------------------------------------------------ UTAH STATE DIGEST Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin For information filed April 1, 2017, 12:00 AM through April 14, 2017, 11:59 PM Volume 2017, No. 9 May 1, 2017 Prepared by Office of Administrative Rules Department of Administrative Services The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic noticing publication of the executive branch of Utah state government. The Office of Administrative Rules, part of the Department of Administrative Services, produces the Digest under authority of Section 63G-3-402. The Digest is a summary of the information found in the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number. The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this Bulletin issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah- state-bull/. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and other versions will be resolved in favor of the PDF version. Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Office of Administrative Rules, PO Box 141007, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3003. Additional rulemaking information and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at https://rules.utah.gov/. The Digest is available free of charge online at https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-state-dig/ and by e-mail Listserv. ************************************************ Office of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. Citation to the source is requested. Utah state digest. Semimonthly. 1. Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. KFU38.U8 348.792'025--DDC 86-658042 *********************************************** NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a substantive change to an existing rule. With a Notice of Proposed Rule, an agency may create a new rule, amend an existing rule, repeal an existing rule, or repeal an existing rule and reenact a new rule. Filings received between April 1, 2017, 12:00 a.m., and April 14, 2017, 11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the May 1, 2017, issue of the Utah State Digest. The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules published in the May 1, 2017, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at least May 31, 2017 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest). The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below. The agency may also hold public hearings. Additionally, citizens or organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed Rule. Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the publication date of the proposed rule." From the end of the public comment period through August 29, 2017, the agency may notify the Office of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Proposed Rule effective. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah State Bulletin. Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule in response to comments received. If the Office of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule lapses. The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below. Comment may be directed to the contact person identified with each rule. Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301, Rule R15-2, and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5a, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RECORDS COMMITTEE No. 41478 (Amendment): R35-1-2. Procedures for Appeal Hearings. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The change removes Subsection R35-1-2(2), which also entails renumbering the other subsections. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This change in no way affects the state budget. It is a procedural change only and will tend to shorten the length of a hearing so the Committee can accommodate more appeals. The Archives provides staff and a venue for the meetings and business of the Committee. This amendment is an effort to maximize the efficiency of the hearing process. No additional resources of the Archives will be necessary, and the state budget is not affected. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local government is affected only as it responds to Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) appeals or make appeals to the Committee. The local governments will experience more efficient use of their time as they appear before the Committee. The budget of local governments will not be affected. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small businesses will not be affected by these changes and procedures. Small businesses do not respond to government records requests and are not involved in these hearings. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Any person or citizen making a records request will experience the more efficient use of time by the Committee. The amendment does away with the five-minute opening presentation of the parties. This amendment is an attempt to shorten the length of hearings. Providing the Committee with documentation for the appeal assures the petitioner that the Committee already has seen the petitioner's appeal. The opening statement elimination will serve to maximize the Committee's time for each hearing. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There is no cost related to this amendment. The Archives supports the Committee in staffing and venue. A more efficient use of time will not affect the cost of this support. The elimination of the opening statements will tend to shorten the time allotted for each hearing but will have no affect of the budget. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Small businesses will not be fiscally impacted by the amendment or changes. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Susan Mumford by phone at 801-531-3861, by FAX at 801-531-3867, or by Internet E-mail at smumford@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/12/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41478.htm No. 41479 (Amendment): R35-2-2. Declining Requests for Hearings. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The omission of the word denial corrects the language between the statute and the administrative rule. Substituting the word "decision" for the word "denial" is a more accurate description of what is required for an appellant to file a notice of appeal to the State Records Committee (Committee). The appellant may not have received a denial but must submit documentation of any decision to complete on appeal. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This change in no way affects the state budget. It is a change in wording which clarifies the appeal process. The Archives provides staffing and a venue for the meetings and business of the Committee. The effort to make the hearing process more efficient will not affect the commitment of time and staffing already provided. The state budget will not be affected. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local government budget will not be affected. A response to a government records request, whether it is a denial, partial denial, or some other decision must be included in the appellant's documentation. If this is communicated to a person requesting records, it will clarify what an appellant to the Committee must include in the documentation. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small businesses will not be affected by this change in wording. Small businesses are not respondents to Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA). - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Any person or citizen filing a notice of appeal to the Committee will be affected by this and be instructed to include any decision in the appeal documentation. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There is no cost related to this amendment. The amendment simply changes wording to clarify the appeal process. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Small businesses are not fiscally impacted by the amendment or changes. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Susan Mumford by phone at 801-531-3861, by FAX at 801-531-3867, or by Internet E-mail at smumford@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/12/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41479.htm AGRICULTURE AND FOOD ANIMAL INDUSTRY No. 41471 (Amendment): R58-21. Trichomoniasis. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The changes to the rule extend the time frame in which the testing must occur. Additionally, it changes the amount that may be charged for a violation of this rule as prescribed in the Utah Code. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is little impact on the state's budget. It is already required that calves be tested. The only changes to this rule are to the time frame in which testing must be accomplished and the amount of fine that may be assessed for violation. There is a potential for additional funds to come in because of the increase in the fine associated with the violation of this rule. However, this increase cannot be calculated because the Department cannot know how many people will be found in violation of this rule. It will not be consistent from year to year. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: No cost or savings to local government, as this program is not regulated by anyone other than the state Department of Agriculture and Food. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There are no additional costs or savings to small businesses. The only change made to this rule is the amount of the fine and the time frame to come into compliance. There are no changes that should affect the cost associated with compliance. The cost associated with compliance has not changed. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There should be no affect on costs or savings to any other entity as there are no changes to the terms of compliance. The changes only affect the time in which individuals have to comply. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The changes in the rule will not increase any costs to affected persons due to the rule being in place for many years. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Trichomoniasis testing is important to protect the livestock industry. It is vital the testing of these animals be done. This rule increases the penalty for violation, as well as increases the amount of time producers have to comply. These changes will not lead to an increase in cost to any entity but will lead to greater compliance among producers. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Barry Pittman by phone at 801-538-7162, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by Internet E-mail at bpittman@utah.gov - Cody James by phone at 801-538-7166, by FAX at 801-538-7169, or by Internet E-mail at codyjames@utah.gov - Kathleen Mathews by phone at 801-538-7103, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by Internet E-mail at kmathews@utah.gov - Scott Ericson by phone at 801-538-7102, by FAX at 801-538-7126, or by Internet E-mail at sericson@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41471.htm COMMERCE OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING No. 41474 (Amendment): R156-24b-102. Definitions. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: In Subsection R156-24b-102(6), the previous definition of joint mobilization included a reference to another profession, and as a result it was difficult for professionals, Division personnel, and the public to understand. This revised definition focuses on the therapeutic actions of the licensed physical therapist, using language consistent with the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) standards. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The only identified cost for the state budget is approximately $75 to republish the rule. There may be some savings to the state budget because the clarified definition may improve the efficiency and timeliness of any Division investigation, but the amount of savings cannot be estimated as it will vary depending on circumstances. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This proposed amendment does not apply to local government, so there should be no fiscal impact on local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There should be no fiscal impact on small business related to this amended definition because the new language adds clarification to practices that are already taking place in the industry. Licensed physical therapists who own or operate small businesses should more readily understand the definition of joint mobilization as it is now more consistent with the language of the APTA. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There should be no fiscal impact on other persons related to this amended definition because the new language adds clarification to practices that are already taking place in the industry. Licensed physical therapists should more readily understand the definition of joint mobilization as it is now more consistent with the language of the APTA. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no identified compliance costs for affected persons because the amended language only adds clarification to practices that are already taking place in the industry. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This amendment merely amends the definition of "joint mobilization" for the practice of physical therapy. This revised definition focuses on the therapeutic actions of the licensed physical therapist, using language consistent with the American Physical Therapy Association standards. No fiscal impact to small business is anticipated. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzette Farmer by phone at 801-530-6789, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at sfarmer@utah.gov INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE: - 05/10/2017 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 474, Salt Lake City, UT THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41474.htm No. 41473 (Amendment): R156-42a-304. Continuing Education. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed amendment at Subsection R156- 42a-304(5) allows the supervision of Level II occupational therapy students to account for two hours of continuing education for each student supervised, with a maximum of eight hours of continuing education during each two-year renewal cycle. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The only identified cost for the state budget is approximately $75 to republish the rule once the proposed amendments are made effective. Any costs incurred will be absorbed in the Division's current budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This proposed amendment does not apply to local government, so there should be no fiscal impact on local government. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The Division is not aware of any small businesses which would be affected by these proposed changes. Therefore, there are no identified costs or savings for small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This proposed amendment, which allows licensed occupational therapists to receive continuing education credit for supervising occupational therapy students, will save the supervising licensees the cost of attending courses for continuing education credit, up to a maximum of eight hours of credit during each two-year renewal cycle. However, this savings will likely be more than offset by the substantial time commitment required from the supervising licensees. For Level II fieldwork, the American Occupational Therapy Association's Standards require a minimum of 24 weeks full-time for occupational therapy students and 16 weeks full-time for occupational therapy assistant students. Still, this proposed amendment will remain financially beneficial for those licensees who would have volunteered their time to supervise regardless of any financial incentive. The amount of any cost or savings cannot be estimated as it will vary depending on circumstances. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no identified compliance costs for affected persons, as this proposed amendment is merely financially beneficial to licensees who will qualify for this continuing education credit. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This amendment permits the supervision of Level II occupational therapy students to account for two hours of continuing education credit for each student supervised, with a maximum of eight hours of continuing education credit during each two-year renewal cycle. No fiscal impact to small business is anticipated. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Suzette Farmer by phone at 801-530-6789, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at sfarmer@utah.gov INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS RULE: - 05/02/2017 09:00 AM, Heber Wells Bldg, 160 E 300 S, Conference Room 402, Salt Lake City, UT THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41473.htm SECURITIES No. 41465 (Amendment): R164-14-2b. Manual Listing Exemption. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This amendment accomplishes the following: 1) deletion of the now-discontinued Standard and Poor's manual from the list of approved securities manuals; 2) insertion of the OTCQX and OTCQB listing services of OTC Markets Group to the list of approved securities manuals; 3) deletion of provisions requiring the expiration of the exemption following changes in a company's board of directors or after other significant changes in the issuer; and 4) insertion of a provision clarifying the financial materials to be provided to investors in the event of a merger or reorganization. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: No net change to the state budget is anticipated as this amendment simply removes an expired securities manual and adds the OTCQX and OTCQB markets maintained by OTC Markets Group Inc. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local governments do not act in this area of regulation. - SMALL BUSINESSES: For small business entities that intend to place their securities in the two newly designated marketplaces, the fees are as follows: for QTCQX, a $5,000 one-time application fee and an annual fee of $20,000; and for OTCQB, a $2,500 application fee and an annual fee of $10,000. The source for this data is the OTC Markets Group website accessed on 04/20/2017. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Costs for other entities seeking listing will be identical to those listed under small businesses costs above. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The Division anticipates that the only change in compliance costs will be any difference in filing costs between the discontinued securities manual and those newly included by this amendment (as disclosed under small businesses costs above). COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: In a world dominated by larger securities markets such as NASDAQ and NYSE, smaller listing services such as those maintained by OTC Markets Group have a key role to play in facilitating capital formation by smaller Utah businesses. By providing lower-cost trading opportunities for companies, as well as important financial information to inform and protect investors, these online resources represent a more efficient evolution from the hardcopy manuals of the past. Also, by clarifying and streamlining the expiration provisions of the rule, the Division hopes to greatly increase the usefulness of this exemption for small and medium-sized businesses throughout the state. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Benjamin Johnson by phone at 801-530-6134, by FAX at 801-530-6980, or by Internet E-mail at bnjohnson@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41465.htm No. 41470 (Amendment): R164-15-4. Notice Filings for Offerings Made Under Federal Crowdfunding Provisions. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Pursuant to the authority granted to the Utah Division of Securities (Division) by Subsection 61-1-15.5(3), the Division adds this section to effectuate the receiving of notice filings for securities offerings made by issuing entities with their principal place of business in this state or who sell fifty percent (50%) or greater of the aggregate amount of the offering to residents of this state. This section establishes the filing requirement and enumerates the required documents and fees that constitute a complete filing. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The state will incur no additional costs to its budget. Each filing will be accompanied by a filing fee of either $100 or $500. The Division anticipates that additional revenue from these fees will not exceed $5,000 during the first full fiscal year of receipt. Currently, the Division anticipates it can process the filings with existing personnel resources. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local governments will not receive or process these filings. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small businesses will be required to pay a filing fee of either $100 or $500. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Other entities seeking to avail themselves of the federal crowdfunding provisions will pay filings fees identical to those for small businesses above. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The compliance costs for affected persons will be the payment of a filing fee of $100 for filings made within the deadline periods specified in the rule and $500 for filings made after the expiration of any applicable deadline. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The crowdfunding provisions of the JOBS Act have the potential to provide Utah-based startup and other small businesses with a new avenue for capital raising on a nationwide scale. As this new marketplace takes shape, the Division wishes to discharge its duty to protect investors by obtaining key information about the offering, the issuing company, and those who manage its operations. The notice filings contemplated under this rule will provide this information at a minimal regulatory cost to business. As required by law, the Utah Securities Commission has reviewed the proposed rule and has approved it by a unanimous vote. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Benjamin Johnson by phone at 801-530-6134, by FAX at 801-530-6980, or by Internet E-mail at bnjohnson@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/30/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41470.htm CORRECTIONS ADMINISTRATION No. 41460 (Amendment): R251-305. Visiting at Community Correctional Centers. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The change in language reduces specific examples of modest or gang affiliated attire. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost since this amendment slightly alters the attire requirements for visitors. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost since this amendment slightly alters the attire requirements for visitors. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost since this amendment slightly alters the attire requirements for visitors. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost since this amendment slightly alters the attire requirements for visitors. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There is no anticipated cost since this amendment slightly alters the attire requirements for visitors. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: No costs or comments on the impact anticipated. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41460.htm CRIME VICTIM REPARATIONS ADMINISTRATION No. 41475 (Amendment): R270-1. Award and Reparation Standards. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The changes to this rule include the addition of the definition of "PEHP", nonsubstantive relettering to accommodate the addition, changing the amount the agency will pay for prescription medications to the amount that would be paid by PEHP, clarifying that medications administered at the time of a sexual assault exam would still be fully covered, and reducing the amount paid for sexual assault exam services to 60%. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The state budget will not experience any impact. The expenditures made by the agency are made from the Crime Victim Reparation Fund, an expendable special revenue fund defined at Section 51-9-404. The agency does not receive a budgeted appropriation for these expenses. There could however be some savings to the Crime Victim Reparation Fund. The estimated savings is highly speculative because the annual amount the agency spends on prescription medication is included in the total amount the agency spends on all medical costs. Furthermore, the percentage of savings for individual medications, dosages, and quantity varies greatly within the fee schedule being adopted. The estimated savings is between $10,000 to $20,000 per year. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There are no costs or savings anticipated for local governments because the rule pertains only to the state agency, which in this particular instance is dealing with only retail pharmacies and the sale of non-taxable medications. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Any of the savings described under state budget above would be a revenue loss shared by any small business pharmacy that chooses to do business with the agency. It is important to note that the fee schedule this rule change implements, is already in place and currently accepted by participating pharmacy retailers. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Large chain pharmacy retailer franchises who choose to participate with the fee schedule would experience the decreased revenue to which they agree when accepting the fee schedule. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There will not be any compliance costs associated with the change. Only the agency is responsible for monitoring compliance and the personnel and resources to monitor compliance are currently in place. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The possible fiscal impacts on businesses have been thoroughly discussed in small businesses and persons other than small businesses above. The impacts, if any, will be negligible and voluntary. The cumulative savings would be spread across or shared with all pharmacy retailers and only among those that choose to participate in the fee schedule by accepting payment from the agency. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Gary Scheller by phone at 801-238-2362, by FAX at 801-533-4127, or by Internet E-mail at garys@utah.gov - Simone Rudas by phone at 801-538-3240, or by Internet E-mail at srudas@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41475.htm ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RADIATION CONTROL, WASTE MANAGEMENT No. 41477 (Amendment): R315-302-1. Location Standards for Disposal Facilities. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed rule change deletes Subsection R315-302-1(2)(a)(iii), a landfill location requirement that prohibits a new solid waste landfill from locating within "farmland classified or evaluated as 'prime,' 'unique,' or of 'statewide importance' by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service under the Prime Farmland Protection Act." Removing this particular location requirement does not lessen environmental or public health protection because other siting standards will continue to apply to siting new solid waste landfills. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: Removing this particular location requirement for siting a new solid waste landfill does not have a financial impact on the state budget since any new solid waste landfill permit application will continue to be evaluated based on all other applicable siting, design, construction, and operation standards and requirements. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Removing this particular location requirement for siting a new solid waste landfill does not have a financial impact on local government since any new solid waste landfill permit application will continue to be evaluated based on all other applicable siting, design, construction, and operation standards and requirements. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Removing this particular location requirement for siting a new solid waste landfill does not have a financial impact on small businesses since any new solid waste landfill permit application will continue to be evaluated based on all other applicable siting, design, construction, and operation standards and requirements. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Removing this particular location requirement for siting a new solid waste landfill does not have a financial impact on persons other than small businesses, business, or local government entities since any new solid waste landfill permit application will continue to be evaluated based on all other applicable siting, design, construction, and operation standards and requirements. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Removing this particular location requirement for siting a new solid waste landfill does not change the costs to comply with preparing and reviewing a new solid waste landfill permit application since that application will continue to be evaluated based on all other applicable siting, design, construction, and operation standards and requirements. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Removing this particular location requirement for siting a new solid waste landfill does not change the costs for a business to comply with preparing and submitting a new solid waste landfill permit application since that application will continue to be evaluated based on all other applicable siting, design, construction, and operation standards and requirements. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Rusty Lundberg by phone at 801-536-4257, by FAX at 801-536-0222, or by Internet E-mail at rlundberg@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/30/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41477.htm HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 41446 (Amendment): R414-1-5. Incorporations by Reference. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This amendment incorporates the Utah Medicaid State Plan, any approved amendments, and the following Medicaid provider manuals by reference to 04/01/2017: Medical Supplies and Durable Medical Equipment Utah Medicaid Provider Manual and the manual's attachment for Donor Human Milk Request Form; Hospital Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual with its attachments; Home Health Agencies Utah Medicaid Provider Manual and the manual's attachment for the Private Duty Nursing Acuity Grid; Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Hospice Care Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals Age 65 or Older Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Personal Care Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services for Individuals with an Acquired Brain Injury Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Utah Community Supports Waiver for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities or Other Related Conditions Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Utah Home and Community-Based Services Waiver for Individuals with Physical Disabilities Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services New Choices Waiver Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Utah Home and Community- Based Services Waiver for Technology Dependent, Medically Fragile Individuals Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Utah Home and Community-Based Waiver Services Medicaid Autism Waiver Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Office of Inspector General (OIG) Administrative Hearings Procedures Manual; Pharmacy Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual with its attachments; Coverage and Reimbursement Code Look-up Tool; CHEC Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual with its attachments; Chiropractic Medicine Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Dental, Oral Maxillofacial, and Orthodontia Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; General Attachments (All Providers) for the Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Indian Health Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Laboratory Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual with its attachments; Medical Transportation Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Non-Traditional Medicaid Plan Utah Medicaid Provider Manual with attachment; Licensed Nurse Practitioner Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual, and the manual's attachment for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Decision Tables; Physician Services, Anesthesiology and Laboratory Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual with its attachments; Podiatric Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Primary Care Network Utah Medicaid Provider Manual with its attachments; Rehabilitative Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; School-Based Skills Development Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Section I: General Information Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Targeted Case Management for Individuals with Serious Mental Illness Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Targeted Case Management for Early Childhood (Ages 0-4) Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Vision Care Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Women's Services Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; Medically Complex Children’s Waiver Utah Medicaid Provider Manual; and Autism Spectrum Disorder Related Services for EPSDT Eligible Individuals Utah Medicaid Provider Manual. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals and Look-up Tool, and hearings procedures described in the OIG manual do not create costs or savings to the Department or other state agencies. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals and Look-up Tool, and hearings procedures described in the OIG manual do not create costs or savings to local governments. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals and Look-up Tool, and hearings procedures described in the OIG manual do not create costs or savings to small businesses. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no budget impact because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals and Look-up Tool, and hearings procedures described in the OIG manual do not create costs or savings to Medicaid recipients and to Medicaid providers. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs because this change only fulfills the requirement to incorporate the State Plan by reference. Implementation of the State Plan is within legislative budget allotments. Further, the rule's incorporation of ongoing Medicaid policy described in the provider manuals and Look-up Tool, and hearings procedures described in the OIG manual do not create costs or savings to a single Medicaid recipient or to a Medicaid provider. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There is no fiscal impact on business because all changes are already in the State Plan. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41446.htm TAX COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION No. 41468 (Amendment): R861-1A-16. Utah State Tax Commission Management Plan Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-1-207. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed amendment provides that the commission retains authority for litigation and requires the executive director to advise the commission on matters under litigation, and to inform the commission of settlement offers that have been received on matters under litigation. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: None--The amendment indicates that the tax commissioners retain authority for matters in litigation and have not delegated this authority to the executive director. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None--The amendment indicates that the tax commissioners retain authority for matters in litigation and have not delegated this authority to the executive director. - SMALL BUSINESSES: None--The amendment indicates that the tax commissioners retain authority for matters in litigation and have not delegated this authority to the executive director. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: None--The amendment indicates that the tax commissioners retain authority for matters in litigation and have not delegated this authority to the executive director. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: None--The amendment indicates that the tax commissioners retain authority for matters in litigation and have not delegated this authority to the executive director. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: No fiscal impact--This change only indicates that the tax commissioners retain authority for matters in litigation and has not delegated this authority to the executive director. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41468.htm PROPERTY TAX No. 41469 (Amendment): R884-24P-24. Form for Notice of Property Valuation and Tax Changes Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-2-918.5 through 59-2-924. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed amendment deletes formulas and definitions for new growth that have been superseded by H.B. 25 (2016), and deletes language indicating how the calculation of ad valorem property tax revenues budgeted by a taxing entity shall be calculated since statutory language mandating that calculation be set forth in rule was deleted in H.B. 25 (2016). ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: None--Any revenue impacts were considered in H.B. 25 (2016). - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None--Any revenue impacts were considered in H.B. 25 (2016). - SMALL BUSINESSES: None--Any revenue impacts were considered in H.B. 25 (2016). - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: None--Any revenue impacts were considered in H.B. 25 (2016). COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: None--The proposed amendment deletes language that has been superseded by H.B. 25 (2016). COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: No fiscal impact--Potential fiscal impacts were considered in H.B. 25 (2016). INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christa Johnson by phone at 801-297-3901, by FAX at 801-297-3907, or by Internet E-mail at cj@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41469.htm TECHNOLOGY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION No. 41459 (Amendment): R895-3. Computer Software Licensing, Copyright, Control, Retention, and Transfer. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed changes to the rule eliminate duplication and revise processes in Sections R895-3-5 and R895-3-6. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There is no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. The proposed changes to the rule eliminate duplication and revise processes in Sections R895-3-5 and R895-3-6. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There is no anticipated cost or savings to local government. The proposed changes to the rule eliminate duplication and revise processes in Sections R895-3-5 and R895-3-6. - SMALL BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to small businesses. The proposed changes to the rule eliminate duplication and revise processes in Sections R895-3-5 and R895-3-6. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There is no anticipated cost or savings to other persons. The proposed changes to the rule eliminate duplication and revise processes in Sections R895-3-5 and R895-3-6. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There is no anticipated compliance costs for affected persons. The proposed changes to the rule eliminate duplication and revise processes in Sections R895-3-5 and R895-3-6. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: There is no anticipated fiscal impact to businesses. The proposed changes to the rule eliminate duplication and revise processes in Sections R895-3-5 and R895-3-6. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Stephanie Weteling by phone at 801-538-3284, by FAX at 801-538-3622, or by Internet E-mail at stephanie@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 06/08/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41459.htm NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES After an agency has published a Proposed Rule in the Utah State Bulletin, it may receive comment that requires the Proposed Rule to be altered before it goes into effect. A Change in Proposed Rule allows an agency to respond to comments it receives. While the law does not designate a comment period for a Change in Proposed Rule, it does provide for a 30-day waiting period. An agency may accept additional comments during this period and, at its option, may designate a comment period or may hold a public hearing. The 30-day waiting period for Changes in Proposed Rules published in Utah State Bulletin ends May 31, 2017. From the end of the 30-day waiting period through August 29, 2017, an agency may notify the Office of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Change in Proposed Rule effective. When an agency submits a Notice of Effective Date for a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule as amended by the Change in Proposed Rule becomes the effective rule. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than 30 days nor more than 120 days after the publication of the Change in Proposed Rule. If the agency designates a public comment period, the effective date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date. Alternatively, the agency may file another Change in Proposed Rule in response to additional comments received. If the Office of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or another Change in Proposed Rule by the end of the 120-day period after publication, the Change in Proposed Rule filings, along with its associated Proposed Rule, lapses. Changes in Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-303, Rule R15-2, and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5b, R15-4-7, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10. COMMERCE REAL ESTATE No. 41024 (Change in Proposed Rule): R162-2e. Appraisal Management Company Administrative Rules. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: In Section R162-2e-102, the Utah Code reference in Subsections R162-2e-102(1)(a)(i) and (1)(a)(ii) were corrected; in Section R162-2e-304, the change clarifies that the presumption of compliance provided in Subsection R162-2e-304(3) is in addition to the presumptions of compliance referenced in Utah Code Subsection 61-2e- 304(2)(b); in Section R162-2e-306, the change clarifies that the restrictions to an AMC in offering an appraisal assignment to an appraiser are for residential mortgage appraisal assignments only. (EDITOR'S NOTE: The original proposed amendment upon which this change in proposed rule (CPR) was based was published in the December 15, 2016, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 5. Underlining in the rule below indicates text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out indicates text that has been deleted. You must view the CPR and the proposed amendment together to understand all of the changes that will be enforceable should the agency make this rule effective.) ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The division has the staff and budget in place to administer this proposed amendment, including the changes to the proposed amendment. It is not expected that the proposed amendment as changed will affect those resources or result in any additional cost or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local governments are not required to comply with or enforce the AMC rules. No fiscal impact to local government is expected from the proposed amendment as changed. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed amendment as changed does not create new obligations for small businesses nor does it increase the cost associated with any existing obligation. No fiscal impact to small business is expected from the proposed amendment as changed. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: The proposed changes to the amendment do not create new obligations for persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities nor do they increase the cost associated with any existing obligation. No fiscal impact to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities is expected from the proposed changes to the proposed amendment. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: The proposed rule does create new obligations and sets new limitations for AMCs subject to the administrative rules. Some AMCs will likely incur compliance costs but these costs will vary among the AMCs and there is no way to determine with specificity the amount of these costs. Some of the public comments made regarding the proposed rule amendment indicated that these costs could be lessened if a transition period were provided for compliance with the proposed rule. In consideration of these comments, the Board with the concurrence of the Director approved changes to the proposed amendment and has delayed the effective date of the proposed amendment as changed which would not become effective until sometime in August 2017. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: A minor amendment is made to the definition of "business day" in Section R162-2e-102. The amendment to Section R162-2e-304 changes and adds to the disclosures an AMC makes to an appraiser and provides a presumption of payment of an appraiser at a customary and reasonable rate, if the compensation is consistent with the fee schedule published by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Denver Regional Loan Center. Section R162-2e-306 is a new section that specifies the manner in which an AMC may offer an appraisal assignment to an appraiser and the manner in which the time of completion of an appraisal report is to be computed. The changes to Section R162-2e-304 and the new Section R162-2e-306 do create new obligations for AMCs, resulting in some additional costs of implementation. However, these changes are minor and there is no way to determine with precision the amount of these costs. The fiscal impact to businesses is negligible. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 05/31/2017 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Justin Barney by phone at 801-530-6603, or by Internet E-mail at justinbarney@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 08/14/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41024.htm FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule. This review is intended to help the agency determine, and to notify the public that, the administrative rule in force is still authorized by statute and necessary. Upon reviewing a rule, an agency may: repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; continue the rule as it is by filing a Five-Year Notice of Review and Statement of Continuation (Review); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by filing a Review. By filing a Review, the agency indicates that the rule is still necessary. The rule text that is being continued may be found in the online edition of the Utah Administrative Code at https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-adm- code/. The rule text may also be inspected at the agency or the Office of Administrative Rules. Reviews are effective upon filing. Reviews are governed by Section 63G-3-305. ATTORNEY GENERAL ADMINISTRATION No. 41466 (5-year Review): R105-1. Attorney General's Selection of Outside Counsel, Expert Witnesses and Other Litigation Support Services. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule is required by Section 67-5-32. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Alan Bachman by phone at 801-538-3105, by FAX at 801-538-3313, or by Internet E-mail at abachman@utah.gov - Paul Tonks by phone at 801-538-9501, or by Internet E-mail at ptonks@utah.gov - Simone Rudas by phone at 801-538-3240, or by Internet E-mail at srudas@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/10/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41466.htm COMMERCE OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING No. 41436 (5-year Review): R156-47b. Massage Therapy Practice Act Rule. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule should be continued as it provides a mechanism to inform potential licensees of the requirements for licensure as allowed under statutory authority provided in Title 58, Chapter 47b, with respect to massage therapists and massage apprentices. The rule should also be continued as it provides information to ensure applicants for licensure are adequately trained and meet minimum licensure requirements and provides licensees with information concerning unprofessional conduct, definitions, and ethical standards relating to the profession. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Allyson Pettley by phone at 801-530-6179, by FAX at 801-530-6511, or by Internet E-mail at apettley@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41436.htm CORRECTIONS ADMINISTRATION No. 41456 (5-year Review): R251-107. Executions. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to address public safety and security within prison facilities prior to, during, and immediately following an execution. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Stephen Gehrke by phone at 801-545-5617, or by Internet E-mail at sgehrke@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/06/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41456.htm No. 41447 (5-year Review): R251-305. Visiting at Community Correctional Centers. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is still to provide the Department of Corrections rules governing visitation at Community Correctional Centers. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/05/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41447.htm No. 41451 (5-year Review): R251-306. Sponsors in Community Correctional Centers. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is still to provide the UDC's policy for sponsors accompanying offenders of Community Correctional Centers into the community and to explain the process of applying to be a sponsor. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/05/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41451.htm No. 41450 (5-year Review): R251-703. Vehicle Direction Station. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is still to define the UDC's policy, procedure, and requirements for the operation of the Vehicle Direction Stations located at the South Point and Central Utah Correctional Facilities. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/05/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41450.htm No. 41449 (5-year Review): R251-704. North Gate. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to provide the Department's policy, procedures, and requirements for the North Gate of the South Point Complex of the Prison. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/05/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41449.htm No. 41448 (5-year Review): R251-705. Inmate Mail Procedures. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to establish the UDC's policies for processing mail received in the Division of Institutional Operations Mail Unit. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/05/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41448.htm No. 41457 (5-year Review): R251-706. Inmate Visiting. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to still provide the UDC's policies, procedures, and requirements for inmate visitation at the Division of Prison Operations. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Stephen Gehrke by phone at 801-545-5617, or by Internet E-mail at sgehrke@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/06/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41457.htm No. 41463 (5-year Review): R251-707. Legal Access. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to provide the policy and procedures for inmates under the control of the Division of Institutional Operations regarding access to courts and counsel. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/07/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41463.htm No. 41453 (5-year Review): R251-710. Search. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to still provide the UDC's policy, procedures, and requirements for conducting searches. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Lucy Ramirez by phone at 801-545-5616, or by Internet E-mail at lramirez@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/05/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41453.htm HEALTH ADMINISTRATION No. 41434 (5-year Review): R380-1. Petitions for Department Declaratory Orders. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The rule provides the procedures for the submission, review, and disposition of petitions for agency declaratory orders. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Tamara Hampton by phone at 801-538-6622, by FAX at 801-538-6306, or by Internet E-mail at thampton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/03/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41434.htm No. 41435 (5-year Review): R380-5. Petitions for Declaratory Orders on Orders Issued by Committees. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule provides the procedures for the submission, review, and disposition of petitions for agency declaratory orders concerning orders issued by committees. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Tamara Hampton by phone at 801-538-6622, by FAX at 801-538-6306, or by Internet E-mail at thampton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/03/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41435.htm No. 41433 (5-year Review): R380-20. Government Records and Access Management. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The rule establishes procedures that implement the Government Records Access and Management Act. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Tamara Hampton by phone at 801-538-6622, by FAX at 801-538-6306, or by Internet E-mail at thampton@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/03/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41433.htm INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION No. 41438 (5-year Review): R590-68. Insider Trading of Equity Securities of Domestic Stock Insurance Companies. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule gives substantial, additional guidance regarding Section 31A-5-303, Insider Trading of Securities. Without this additional and much more detailed guidance, several forms of exemption from the requirements of the statute would not be apparent or effectively available to entities to whom the described situations apply. This lack of guidance would be confusing at best and at worst could lead to costly decisions being made in error regarding the form of any insider trading transaction or the absence thereof. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Steve Gooch by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at sgooch@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41438.htm No. 41439 (5-year Review): R590-85. Individual Accident and Health Insurance and Individual and Group Medicare Supplement Rates. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule provides standards for rating certain policies. It allows insurers to request increases as necessary to maintain a viable block of businesses and to protect consumers against unfair pricing of policies. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Steve Gooch by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at sgooch@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41439.htm No. 41443 (5-year Review): R590-108. Interest Rate During Grace Period or Upon Reinstatement of Policy. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule provides limits for the maximum interest rate that an insurer can charge on premiums due under a life insurance or annuity contract during a grace period or upon subsequent reinstatement of the contract. It protects consumers against their insurer charging them an unreasonably high interest rate. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Steve Gooch by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at sgooch@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41443.htm No. 41437 (5-year Review): R590-120. Surety Bond Forms. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule exempts surety insurers from filing forms. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Steve Gooch by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at sgooch@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41437.htm No. 41441 (5-year Review): R590-146. Medicare Supplement Insurance Standards. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule provides consumer protection and guidelines for Medicare Supplement plans sold in Utah. It ensures that the various plans are the same from company to company. This allows consumers to decide on the type of plan they want and then base their purchase on price and service. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Steve Gooch by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at sgooch@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41441.htm No. 41440 (5-year Review): R590-203. Health Grievance Review Process. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule clarifies statute and explains the difference between federal law and state statutes. The rule ensures that a carrier's grievance review procedures for individual and group health insurance and disability income insurance plans comply with federal law. Removing this rule would confuse insurers as to what is required of them in regards to their grievance procedures. This rule provides consumer protections. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Steve Gooch by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at sgooch@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41440.htm No. 41442 (5-year Review): R590-239. Exemption of Student Health Centers from Insurance Code. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to exempt student health centers established by institutions of higher education from regulation under the Utah Insurance Code. The rule clarifies what is and is not insurance so as to not impose a greater burden on an organization that does not sell insurance. It states that student health centers are not insurance and therefore are not regulated by the Utah Insurance Department. Health insurance from an insurer sold or provided through an institution to its students is not exempt from state insurance regulations. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Steve Gooch by phone at 801-538-3803, by FAX at 801-538-3829, or by Internet E-mail at sgooch@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41442.htm PUBLIC LANDS POLICY COORDINATING OFFICE ADMINISTRATION No. 41444 (5-year Review): R694-1. Archaeology Permits. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Rule R694-1 provides clarification to Utah Code that allows for the practical application of Section 9-8-305. The rule helps to define several ambiguous terms, outlines what information may be required in a permit application (as allowed in the associated statute), establishes a time line for permit application review and how long survey permits may last, and clarifies permit provisions and the suspension/revocation and reinstatement process (as stipulated in Section 9-8-305). Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - David Yoder by phone at 801-863-6261, or by Internet E-mail at davidyoder@utah.gov - Kathleen Clarke by phone at 801-537-9803, or by Internet E-mail at kathleenclarke@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/04/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41444.htm TECHNOLOGY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION No. 41454 (5-year Review): R895-3. Computer Software Licensing, Copyright, Control, Retention, and Transfer. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The statutes, Section 63F-1-206 and 63G-3-201, still require this rule. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Stephanie Weteling by phone at 801-538-3284, by FAX at 801-538-3622, or by Internet E-mail at stephanie@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/06/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41454.htm NOTICES OF FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSIONS Rulewriting agencies are required by law to review each of their administrative rules within five years of the date of the rule's original enactment or the date of last review (Section 63G-3-305). If the agency finds that it will not meet the deadline for review of the rule (the five- year anniversary date), it may file a Notice of Five-Year Review Extension (Extension) with the Office of Administrative Rules. The Extension permits the agency to file the review up to 120 days beyond the anniversary date. Agencies have filed Extensions for the rules listed below. The "Extended Due Date" is 120 days after the anniversary date. Extensions are governed by Subsection 63G-3-305(6). ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY No. 41432 (Five-Year Extension): R307-424. Permits: Mercury Requirements for Electric Generating Units. EXTENSION REASON: This rule was scheduled to be reviewed by the Utah Air Quality Board on 04/05/2017. The Division of Air Quality is not holding a Board meeting in April, and the rule will be reviewed on 05/03/2017. The new deadline is 08/03/2017. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Ryan Stephens by phone at 801-536-4419, by FAX at 801-536-0085, or by Internet E-mail at rstephens@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/03/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41432.htm HEALTH FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, CHILD CARE LICENSING No. 41472 (Five-Year Extension): R430-1. General Licensing, Certificate, and Enforcement Provisions, Child Care Facilities. EXTENSION REASON: The agency is planning on repealing this rule but is not ready to do it yet, and there will not be enough time to file before the required date. The new deadline is 08/29/2017. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-803-4618, by FAX at 801-237-0786, or by Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/12/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41472.htm TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND SAFETY No. 41476 (Five-Year Extension): R920-50. Ropeway Operation Safety. EXTENSION REASON: The agency has identified a couple of definitions that need to be reworked and need the 120 days to coordinate the modifications with the Transportation Commission. The new deadline is 08/14/2017. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov - James Palmer by phone at 801-965-4000, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by Internet E-mail at jimpalmer@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 04/13/2017 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2017/20170501/41476.htm NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES State law provides for agencies to make their administrative rules effective and enforceable after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law permits an agency to make a rule effective no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period, nor more than 120 days after the publication date. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment period, the law permits an agency to make a rule effective on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the rule's publication date, but not more than 120 days after the publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses. Agencies have notified the Office of Administrative Rules that the rules listed below have been made effective. Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), Section 63G-3-303, and Sections R15-4-5a and R15-4-5b. COMMERCE OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING No. 41299 (AMD): R156-1.General Rule of the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing Published: 03/01/2017 Effective: 04/11/2017 No. 41298 (AMD): R156-55c.Plumber Licensing Act Rule Published: 03/01/2017 Effective: 04/10/2017 EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION No. 41318 (AMD): R277-519.Educator Inservice Procedures and Credit Published: 03/01/2017 Effective: 04/10/2017 No. 41319 (AMD): R277-916.Career and Technical Education Introduction and Work-Based Learning Programs Published: 03/01/2017 Effective: 04/10/2017 HUMAN SERVICES RECOVERY SERVICES No. 41170 (AMD): R527-250.Emancipation Published: 02/01/2017 Effective: 04/14/2017 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION No. 41322 (AMD): R590-248-4.Mandatory Fraud Reporting Process Published: 03/01/2017 Effective: 04/07/2017 No. 40953 (CPR): R590-273.Continuing Care Provider Rule Published: 03/01/2017 Effective: 04/07/2017 No. 40953 (NEW): R590-273.Continuing Care Provider Rule Published: 12/01/2016 Effective: 04/07/2017 RULES INDEX The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all administrative rulemaking actions made effective since January 1. The Rules Index is not included Digest. However, a copy of the current Rules Index is available https://rules.utah.gov/researching/ . <> ----------------------------