---------------------------- Utah State Digest, Vol. 2018, No. 16 (August 15, 2018) ------------------------------------------------------------ UTAH STATE DIGEST Summary of the Contents of the Utah State Bulletin For information filed July 17, 2018, 12:00 AM through August 1, 2018, 11:59 PM Volume 2018, No. 16 August 15, 2018 Prepared by Office of Administrative Rules Department of Administrative Services The Utah State Digest (Digest) is an official electronic noticing publication of the executive branch of Utah state government. The Office of Administrative Rules, part of the Department of Administrative Services, produces the Digest under authority of Section 63G-3-402. The Digest is a summary of the information found in the Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) of the same volume and issue number. The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this Bulletin issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-state-bull/. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and other versions will be resolved in favor of the PDF version. Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appear in the Digest should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Digest or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Office of Administrative Rules, PO Box 141007, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3003. Additional rulemaking information and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at https://rules.utah.gov/. The Digest is available free of charge online at https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-state-dig/ and by e-mail Listserv. ************************************************ Office of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. Citation to the source is requested. Utah state digest. Semimonthly. 1. Delegated legislation--Utah--Digests. I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. KFU38.U8 348.792'025--DDC 86-658042 *********************************************** SPECIAL NOTICES Notice for September 2018 Medicaid Rate Changes - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/sn160502.htm EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS Under authority granted by the Utah Constitution and various federal and state statutes, the Governor periodically issues Executive Documents, which can be categorized as either Executive Orders, Proclamations, and Declarations. Executive Orders set policy for the executive branch; create boards and commissions; provide for the transfer of authority; or otherwise interpret, implement, or give administrative effect to a provision of the Constitution, state law or executive policy. Proclamations call special or extraordinary legislative sessions; designate classes of cities; publish states-of-emergency; promulgate other official formal public announcements or functions; or publicly avow or cause certain matters of state government to be made generally known. Declarations designate special days, weeks or other time periods; call attention to or recognize people, groups, organizations, functions, or similar actions having a public purpose; or invoke specific legislative purposes (such as the declaration of an agricultural disaster). The Governor's Office staff files Executive Documents that have legal effect with the Office of Administrative Rules for publication and distribution. Wildland Fire Management, Utah Exec. Order No. 2018-5 - Ashlee Buchholz by phone at 801-538-1621, by FAX at 801-538-1528, or by Internet E-mail at Abuchholz@utah.gov FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/execdocs/2018/ExecDoc160531.htm NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES A state agency may file a Proposed Rule when it determines the need for a substantive change to an existing rule. With a Notice of Proposed Rule, an agency may create a new rule, amend an existing rule, repeal an existing rule, or repeal an existing rule and reenact a new rule. Filings received between July 17, 2018, 12:00 a.m., and August 1, 2018, 11:59 p.m. are summarized in this, the August 15, 2018, issue of the Utah State Digest. The law requires that an agency accept public comment on Proposed Rules published in the August 15, 2018, issue of the Utah State Bulletin until at least September 14, 2018 (the Bulletin is the parent publication of the Digest). The agency may accept comment beyond this date and will indicate the last day the agency will accept comment in the rule information published below. The agency may also hold public hearings. Additionally, citizens or organizations may request the agency hold a hearing on a specific Proposed Rule. Section 63G-3-302 requires that a hearing request be received by the agency proposing the rule "in writing not more than 15 days after the publication date of the proposed rule." From the end of the public comment period through December 13, 2018, the agency may notify the Office of Administrative Rules that it wants to make the Proposed Rule effective. The agency sets the effective date. The date may be no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period nor more than 120 days after the publication date in the Utah State Bulletin. Alternatively, the agency may file a Change in Proposed Rule in response to comments received. If the Office of Administrative Rules does not receive a Notice of Effective Date or a Change in Proposed Rule, the Proposed Rule lapses. The public, interest groups, and governmental agencies are invited to review and comment on the Proposed Rules listed below. Comment may be directed to the contact person identified with each rule. Proposed Rules are governed by Section 63G-3-301, Rule R15-2, and Sections R15-4-3, R15-4-4, R15-4-5a, R15-4-9, and R15-4-10. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FINANCE No. 43095 (Amendment): R25-7. Travel-Related Reimbursements for State Employees. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: These amendments change the amount that can be reimbursed for tips for ground transportation, and gives employees different options of submitting reimbursement requests. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: There will potentially be an increased cost to the state as reimbursements for incidentals may increase. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There may be costs to local governments that are required to follow this rule. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small businesses will not see an increase in revenue. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Individuals eligible for reimbursement may see an increase in their reimbursement for ground transportation tips. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Because these amendments change reimbursement rates for ground transportation tips and do not require any new actions on the part of the persons applying for reimbursements, there are no compliance costs. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: I have reviewed these changes with the Division of Finance Director and believe these changes are reasonable and warranted. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/14/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Cory Weeks by phone at 801-538-3100, or by Internet E-mail at cweeks@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/21/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43095.htm COMMERCE REAL ESTATE No. 43123 (Amendment): R162-2e-205. Division Service Fees -- AMC Registry Fee. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The AMC registry fee is a new federal fee established by the Appraisal Subcommittee which is collected by each state AMC regulatory agency. In Utah, the regulatory agency is the Division. The Division will collect the AMC registry fee from AMCs and transmit the fees to the Appraisal Subcommittee. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The Division has the staff and budget in place to administer this proposed amendment. After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that this proposed rule amendment will not result in a fiscal impact, affect those resources, or result in any additional cost or savings to the state budget. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: Local governments are not required to comply with or enforce the Appraisal Management Company Registration and Regulation rules. After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that this proposed rule amendment will not result in a fiscal impact to local governments. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Only small businesses that are AMCs registered in Utah, or are operated as a subsidiary of a federally-regulated financial institution are subject to payment of the AMC registry fee. After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that this proposed rule amendment will not result in a fiscal impact to small businesses, except for the affected AMCs. The compliance cost for AMCs affected by this proposed rule amendment is estimated under compliance costs for affected persons below. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Only AMCs registered in Utah, or that operate in Utah as a subsidiary of a federally-regulated financial institution are subject to payment of the AMC registry fee. After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that this proposed rule amendment will not result in a fiscal impact to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities, except for the affected AMCs. The compliance cost for AMCs affected by this proposed rule amendment is estimated under compliance costs for affected persons below. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: This proposed amendment provides for the collection and transmittal of the AMC registry fee. The AMC registry fee is a new federal requirement for AMCs registered in Utah, or operating in Utah as a subsidiary of a federally-regulated financial institution. The Division only collects the fee and transmits it to the Appraisal Subcommittee. After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that the AMC registry fee will result in a combined fiscal impact to affected AMCs of $80,000 per year. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This new rule implements H.B. 243 (2018) which provides that the federally-mandated AMC registry fee shall be collected by the Division and transmitted to the appropriate federal agency. The AMC registry fee is a new federal requirement for AMCs registered in Utah, or operating in Utah as a subsidiary of a federally-regulated financial institution. The Division only collects the fee and transmits it to the Appraisal Subcommittee. After conducting a thorough analysis, the Division determined that the AMC registry fee will result in a combined fiscal impact to affected Utah AMCs of $80,000 per year. There are an estimated 34 large businesses in the AMC industry (NAICS) operating in Utah. These businesses account for an estimated 25% of the total number of AMC registry fees required to be paid to the federal Appraisal Subcommittee per year. The estimated remaining 75% of the AMC registry fees will be paid by small business AMCs. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/14/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Justin Barney by phone at 801-530-6603, or by Internet E-mail at justinbarney@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/21/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43123.htm HEALTH FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL HEALTH CARE NEEDS No. 43105 (Amendment): R398-10. Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disability Reporting. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: These rule changes are updating terminology to clarify language to bring this rule into alignment with statute changes in Subsection 53E-9-308(6)(b). ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: These rule changes are not expected to have any fiscal impact on state revenues and expenditures because the reporting requirements remain the same. With the changes in the student privacy laws, the reporting requirement to URADD needed to be clarified. Subsection 53E-9-308(6)(b) clarified the reporting requirement. These rule changes are only updating verbiage to match statute changes. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: These rule changes are not expected to have any fiscal impact on local governments revenues and expenditures because the reporting requirements remain the same. With the changes in the student privacy laws, the reporting requirement to URADD needed to be clarified. Subsection 53E-9-308(6)(b) clarified the reporting requirement. These rule changes are only updating verbiage to match statute changes. - SMALL BUSINESSES: These rule changes are not expected to have any fiscal impact on small businesses' revenues and expenditures because the reporting requirements remain the same. With the changes in the student privacy laws, the reporting requirement to URADD needed to be clarified. Subsection 53E-9-308(6)(b) clarified the reporting requirement. These rule changes are only updating verbiage to match statute changes. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: These rule changes are not expected to have any fiscal impact on non-small businesses revenues and expenditures because reporting requirements remain the same. With the changes in the student privacy laws, the reporting requirement to URADD needed to be clarified. Subsection 53E-9-308(6)(b) clarified the reporting requirement. These rule changes are only updating verbiage to match statute changes. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: These rule changes are not expected to have any fiscal impact on school districts and education institutions as they have been completing this reporting since the beginning of URADD. With the changes in the student privacy laws, the reporting to URADD needed to be clarified. Subsection 53E-9-308(6)(b) clarified the reporting requirement. School districts and education institutions are the entities requesting wording clarifications. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that these amendments will not result in a fiscal impact to businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/14/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Joyce McStotts by phone at 801-584-8239, by FAX at 801-584-8488, or by Internet E-mail at jmcstotts@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/21/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43105.htm FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, CHILD CARE LICENSING No. 43107 (Repeal): R430-1. General Licensing, Certificate, and Enforcement Provisions, Child Care Facilities. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule is repealed in its entirety. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The proposed repeal of this rule is not expected to have any fiscal impact on the state government revenues or expenditures because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed repeal of this rule is not expected to have any fiscal impact on local governments' revenues or expenditures because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed repeal of this rule is not expected to have any fiscal impact on small businesses' revenues or expenditures because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There will be no costs associated with the repeal of this rule because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There will be no costs associated with the repeal of this rule because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that the repeal of this rule will not result in fiscal impact to businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/14/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-803-4618, by FAX at 801-237-0786, or by Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/21/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43107.htm No. 43106 (Repeal): R430-6. Background Screening. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: This rule is repealed in its entirety. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The proposed repeal of this rule is not expected to have any fiscal impact on the state government revenues or expenditures because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: The proposed repeal of this rule is not expected to have any fiscal impact on local governments' revenues or expenditures because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. - SMALL BUSINESSES: The proposed repeal of this rule is not expected to have any fiscal impact on small businesses' revenues or expenditures because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There will be no costs associated with the repeal of this rule because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There will be no costs associated with the repeal of this rule because this rule has already been replaced and the new rule made effective, making this rule inaccurate and unnecessary. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: After conducting a thorough analysis, it was determined that this rule repeal will not result in fiscal impact to businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/14/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Simon Bolivar by phone at 801-803-4618, by FAX at 801-237-0786, or by Internet E-mail at sbolivar@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/21/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43106.htm LABOR COMMISSION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH No. 43121 (Amendment): R614-1-4. Incorporation of Federal Standards. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Employers in certain industries will be required to electronically submit injury and illness data that employers are already required to keep under existing regulations. The frequency and content of these establishment-specific submissions is set out in this rule and is dependent on the size and industry of the employer. This amended rule (29 CFR 1904) will contain updated requirements on how employers inform employees to report work-related injuries and illnesses to their employer. It also requires employers to inform employees of their right to report work-related injuries and illnesses free from retaliation; clarifies the existing implicit requirement that an employer's procedure for reporting work-related injuries and illnesses must be reasonable and not deter or discourage employees from reporting; and prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for reporting work-related injuries or illnesses. This amended rule clarifies the rights of employees and their representatives to access the injury and illness records. 29 CFR 1910.1053 and 29 CFR 1926.1153 are new respirable crystalline silica standards. These standards will have a lower permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms of respirable crystalline silica per cubic meter of air, averaged over an 8-hour day, in both general industry and construction, as compared to the previous PELs which were approximately equivalent to 100 micrograms per cubic meter for general industry and 250 micrograms/m3 for construction. These standards will also contain an action level of 25 micrograms per cubic meter, averaged over an 8-hour day, and associated ancillary requirements. These incorporated standards will contain provisions for measuring how much silica workers are exposed to, limiting workers' access to areas where silica exposures are high, using effective methods for reducing exposures, providing medical exams to workers, establishing and implementing control plans, and training workers about silica-related hazards and how to limit exposure. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: The fiscal impact on the state government is inestimable due to the inability to determine how many employees in this sector will be covered under the silica standard. NAICS codes were used to determine employers that would be affected and the NAICS coding used by the state government does not show work conducted by state government employees. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 29 CFR 1910.1053 and 29 CFR 1926.1153: anticipated fiscal cost = $176,207; anticipated fiscal benefit = $2,337,778; and net fiscal benefit = $2,161,571. 29 CFR 1904: amendments to this rule will not have a significant economic impact. It does not add to or change any employer's obligation to complete, retain, and certify injury and illness records and does not add to or change the recording criteria or definitions for these records. The only changes are that, under certain circumstances, employers will be obligated to submit information from these records in an electronic format and to assure that employees have, and understand that they have, a right to report injuries and illnesses without fear of discrimination. The electronic submission of information would be a relatively simple and quick matter. In most cases, submitting information would require several basic steps: 1) logging on to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) web-based submission system; 2) entering basic establishment information into the system (the first time only); 3) copying the required injury and illness information from the establishments' records into the electronic submission forms; and 4) hitting a button to submit the information to OSHA. In many cases, especially for large establishments, injury and illness data is already kept electronically, so step 3 would be less time-intensive relative to cases in which records are kept on paper. The submission system, as anticipated, would also save an establishments' information from one submission to the next, so step 2 might be eliminated for most establishments after the first submission. - SMALL BUSINESSES: 29 CFR 1910.1053 and 29 CFR 1926.1153: anticipated fiscal cost = $7,188,456; anticipated fiscal benefit = $224,516,539; and net fiscal benefit = $217,328,083. 29 CFR 1904: amendments to this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses. It does not add to or change any employers' obligation to complete, retain, and certify injury and illness records and does not add to or change the recording criteria or definitions for these records. The only changes are that, under certain circumstances, employers will be obligated to submit information from these records in an electronic format and to assure that employees have, and understand that they have, a right to report injuries and illnesses without fear of discrimination. The electronic submission of information would be a relatively simple and quick matter. In most cases, submitting information would require several basic steps: 1) logging on to OSHA's web-based submission system; 2) entering basic establishment information into the system (the first time only); 3) copying the required injury and illness information from the establishments' records into the electronic submission forms; and 4) hitting a button to submit the information to OSHA. In many cases, especially for large establishments, injury and illness data is already kept electronically, so step 3 would be less time-intensive relative to cases in which records are kept on paper. The submission system, as anticipated, would also save an establishment's information from one submission to the next, so step 2 might be eliminated for most establishments after the first submission. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: 29 CFR 1910.1053 and 29 CFR 1926.1153: aggregate anticipated cost or saving to large businesses: anticipated fiscal cost = $1,127,278; anticipated fiscal benefit = $9,710,767; and net fiscal benefit = $8,583,489. Other parties that will benefit from the adoption of the silica standard are manufacturers and vendors whose services will be needed for employers to comply with the silica standard, such as controls, respiratory protection and programs, medical surveillance, control plans, regulated areas (general industry only) and training. The fiscal benefit is $7,321,704. 29 CFR 1904: amendments to this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of large entities. It does not add to or change any employers' obligation to complete, retain, and certify injury and illness records and does not add to or change the recording criteria or definitions for these records. The only changes are that, under certain circumstances, employers will be obligated to submit information from these records in an electronic format and to assure that employees have, and understand that they have, a right to report injuries and illnesses without fear of discrimination. The electronic submission of information would be a relatively simple and quick matter. In most cases, submitting information would require several basic steps: 1) logging on to OSHA's web-based submission system; 2) entering basic establishment information into the system (the first time only); 3) copying the required injury and illness information from the establishments' records into the electronic submission forms; and 4) hitting a button to submit the information to OSHA. In many cases, especially for large establishments, injury and illness data is already kept electronically, so step 3 would be less time-intensive relative to cases in which records are kept on paper. The submission system, as anticipated, would also save an establishments' information from one submission to the next. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: 29 CFR 1910.1053 and 29 CFR 1926.1153: the cost depends on the nature of the business and ranges from $295 for NAICS 238200 (Building Equipment Contractors) to $220,558 for NAICS 213112 (Support Services for Oil and Gas Operations). Below is an estimate of the median cost per an affected non-small businesses, small businesses, and local governments. The median annualized cost per an affected large establishment is $1,352. The median annualized cost per an affected small business is $1,200. The median annualized cost per an affected local government "establishment" as a result of incorporating the silica standard is $2,449. 29 CFR 1904: amendments to this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of entities. It does not add to or change any employer's obligation to complete, retain, and certify injury and illness records and does not add to or change the recording criteria or definitions for these records. The only changes are that, under certain circumstances, employers will be obligated to submit information from these records in an electronic format and to assure that employees have, and understand that they have, a right to report injuries and illnesses without fear of discrimination. The electronic submission of information would be a relatively simple and quick matter. In most cases, submitting information would require several basic steps: 1) logging on to OSHA's web-based submission system; 2) entering basic establishment information into the system (the first time only); 3) copying the required injury and illness information from the establishment's records into the electronic submission forms; and 4) hitting a button to submit the information to OSHA. In many cases, especially for large establishments, injury and illness data is already kept electronically, so step 3 would be less time-intensive relative to cases in which records are kept on paper. The submission system, as anticipated, would also save an establishments' information from one submission to the next, so step 2 might be eliminated for most establishments after the first submission. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: This rule will have a fiscal impact on businesses, however, to remain at least as effective as Federal OSHA and be able to retain Utah's State-Plan status, and to keep the employees of the state safe, these changes to this rule must be adopted. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/15/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Cameron Ruppe by phone at 801-530-6898, or by Internet E-mail at cruppe@utah.gov - Christopher Hill by phone at 801-530-6113, by FAX at 801-530-6390, or by Internet E-mail at chill@utah.gov - Holly Lawrence by phone at 801-530-6494, by FAX at 801-530-7606, or by Internet E-mail at hlawrence@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/24/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43121.htm PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL No. 43104 (Amendment): R714-160. Equipment Standards for Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Safety Inspections. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: If a vehicle being inspected is a commercial motor vehicle, the "acute area" of a windshield means the area of a commercial vehicle windshield extending upward from the height of the top of the steering wheel, excluding a 2-inch border at the top of the windshield, and a 1-inch border at each side of the windshield or windshield panel. If the vehicle is a passenger vehicle, the "acute area" of a windshield means the area of a passenger vehicle windshield inside a 6-inch border measured from the edge of the glass where it meets the molding around the entire outside of the windshield. This definition of "acute area" of a windshield for a passenger vehicle has not changed. In addition, the reference to Subsection 53-8-205(1)(b)(iii) was removed from Section R714-160-21 as it was removed from statute upon passage of H.B. 265 during the 2017 General Session; and the reference in Section R714-160-23 was changed from Subsection 53-8-205(3) to Subsection 53-8- 205(1)(a) because the reference was not correct. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: This proposed amendment is not expected to have any fiscal impact on state government revenues or expenditures because the change does not affect the operating costs of the Utah Highway Patrol Safety Inspection Office. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This proposed amendment is not expected to have any fiscal impact on local governments revenues or expenditures, because vehicles owned or operated by local governments are not considered to be operating in commerce. - SMALL BUSINESSES: Small businesses will be affected by this amendment because some will be required to have their vehicles' windshields repaired or replaced, and other small businesses will provide that service. Auto glass replacement shops and entities that operate commercial vehicles are groups that will be affected. According to the Department of Workforce Services (DWS) Firm Find Data (NAICS code 811122) there are 106 auto glass replacement shops in Utah identified as small businesses. These businesses would experience a direct benefit from this amendment as a result of damaged windshield repair or replacement sales. This benefit would be ongoing, but it would be difficult to estimate the number of windshields damaged on commercial vehicles each year that would need to be repaired or replaced by these businesses. According to the FMCSA office in Utah, there are approximately 17,462 entities that operate vehicles with a United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) number which indicates the vehicles may be used in commerce. These entities would experience a direct cost as a result of this amendment. This cost would be ongoing, but it would be difficult to estimate the number of damaged windshields an entity may be required to repair or replace during a year. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: According to the FMCSA office in Utah, there are approximately 17,462 entities that operate vehicles with a USDOT number which indicates the vehicles may be used in commerce. Some of these entities would be considered businesses and some would be considered non-profit organizations (i.e. Utah Coalition for Animals). These entities would experience a direct cost as a result of this amendment. This cost would be ongoing, but it would be difficult to estimate the number of damaged windshields an entity may be required to repair or replace during a year. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There are no compliance costs associated with the change in this rule. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Both small and non-small businesses with employees that operate commercial vehicles will be affected by this amendment because some will be required to have their vehicles’ windshields repaired or replaced in order to be in compliance. Other businesses that provide repair service and auto glass replacement shops will experience a positive fiscal impact. Both the costs associated with obtaining repairs and the cost benefit to those providing repair or glass replacement services would be ongoing, but it would be difficult to estimate the number of windshields damaged on commercial vehicles each year that would need to be repaired or replaced by these businesses. According to the FMCSA office in Utah, there are approximately 135 entities with 50 or more drivers that operate vehicles with a USDOT number which indicates the vehicles may be used in commerce. According to DWS Firm Find Data (NAICS code 811122) there are two auto glass replacement shops in Utah identified as non-small businesses. The head of the Department of Public Safety, Keith D. Squires, has reviewed and approved this fiscal analysis. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/14/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Greg Willmore by phone at 801-965-4889, or by Internet E-mail at gwillmor@utah.gov - Kim Gibb by phone at 801-556-8198, by FAX at 801-964-4482, or by Internet E-mail at kgibb@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/21/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43104.htm TRANSPORTATION PRECONSTRUCTION No. 43096 (Amendment): R930-8. Utility Relocations Required by Highway Projects. SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: In Subsection R930-8-3(3), the definition reference from Subsection 54-3-29(1)(f) is changed, which was recently argued by an attorney that the utility was not regulated by the PSC so the definition did not apply to the definition of a utility in Section 72-6-116. UDOT has been functioning with this definition to date. In Subsection R930-8-10(1), the authority reference from the Statewide Utilities and Railroad Engineer as the authority to issue an Administrative Order to the Statewide Railroad and Utilities Director is changed. The title of Engineer no longer exists and without this change, the Director may not legally have the authority to issue an Administrative Order. This rule is consistent with other required Rules, federal standards, and Department general policies. ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: - THE STATE BUDGET: UDOT does not anticipate that these proposed rule changes will affect the state budget in any way because their purpose is to correct an erroneous statutory citation, recognize a title change for a UDOT employee, and make technical and semantic changes to the text, none of which will lead to fiscal changes. - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: UDOT does not anticipate that these proposed rule changes will affect local governments in any way because their purpose is to correct an erroneous statutory citation, recognize a title change for a UDOT employee, and make technical and semantic changes to the text, none of which will lead to fiscal changes. - SMALL BUSINESSES: UDOT does not anticipate that these proposed rule changes will affect small businesses in any way because their purpose is to correct an erroneous statutory citation, recognize a title change for a UDOT employee, and make technical and semantic changes to the text, none of which will lead to fiscal changes. - PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: UDOT does not anticipate that these proposed rule changes will affect persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities in any way because their purpose is to correct an erroneous statutory citation, recognize a title change for a UDOT employee, and make technical and semantic changes to the text, none of which will lead to fiscal changes. COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: UDOT does not anticipate that these proposed rule changes will compliance costs for any person because their purpose is to correct an erroneous statutory citation, recognize a title change for a UDOT employee, and make technical and semantic changes to the text, none of which will lead to fiscal changes. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: These proposed rule changes will not lead to any fiscal impact on businesses. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 09/14/2018 DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov - Eileen McCown by phone at 801-965-4030, or by Internet E-mail at emccown@utah.gov - James Palmer by phone at 801-965-4000, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by Internet E-mail at jimpalmer@utah.gov - Linda Hull by phone at 801-965-4253, or by Internet E-mail at lhull@utah.gov THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 09/21/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43096.htm FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION Within five years of an administrative rule's original enactment or last five-year review, the agency is required to review the rule. This review is intended to help the agency determine, and to notify the public that, the administrative rule in force is still authorized by statute and necessary. Upon reviewing a rule, an agency may: repeal the rule by filing a Proposed Rule; continue the rule as it is by filing a Five-Year Notice of Review and Statement of Continuation (Review); or amend the rule by filing a Proposed Rule and by filing a Review. By filing a Review, the agency indicates that the rule is still necessary. The rule text that is being continued may be found in the online edition of the Utah Administrative Code at https://rules.utah.gov/publications/utah-adm-code/. The rule text may also be inspected at the agency or the Office of Administrative Rules. Reviews are effective upon filing. Reviews are governed by Section 63G-3-305. HEALTH HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 43122 (5-year Review): R414-9. Federally Qualified Health Centers and Rural Health Clinics. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The Department will continue this rule because it implements services in federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics as described in the Medicaid provider manual and in the Medicaid State Plan. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Carrie Stoker by phone at 801-538-6357, or by Internet E-mail at clstoker@utah.gov - Craig Devashrayee by phone at 801-538-6641, by FAX at 801-538-6099, or by Internet E-mail at cdevashrayee@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/27/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43122.htm HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION No. 43094 (5-year Review): R495-879. Parental Support for Children in Care. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule should be continued because the laws and statutes governing ORS’s responsibilities in regards to children who are placed in the care and custody of the state are still in effect. This rule should also be continued to ensure that child support obligations continue to be standardized for all agencies that place a child in the care or custody of the state. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Casey Cole by phone at 801-741-7523, by FAX at 801-536-8509, or by Internet E-mail at cacole@utah.gov - Jonah Shaw by phone at 801-538-4219, by FAX at 801-538-3942, or by Internet E-mail at jshaw@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/17/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43094.htm LABOR COMMISSION ADJUDICATION No. 43127 (5-year Review): R602-4. Procedures for Termination of Temporary Total Disability Compensation Pursuant to Reemployment Under Section 34A-2-410.5. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule remains necessary in order to govern the adjudication of an employer's or insurance carrier's request to reduce or terminate an injured worker's temporary total disability compensation. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christopher Hill by phone at 801-530-6113, by FAX at 801-530-6390, or by Internet E-mail at chill@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 08/01/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43127.htm No. 43126 (5-year Review): R602-5. Procedures for Resolving Disputes Regarding "Cooperation" and "Diligent Pursuit" Under Subsection 34A-2- 413(6)(e)(iii) and Subsection 34A-2-413(9) Consistent with Utah Administrative Code Subsection R612-200-7(D)(4). REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule remains necessary in order to govern the hearing process for decisions related to an employer's failure to pursue a reemployment plan or an employee's failure to cooperate with a reemployment plan. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christopher Hill by phone at 801-530-6113, by FAX at 801-530-6390, or by Internet E-mail at chill@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 08/01/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43126.htm No. 43125 (5-year Review): R602-6. Procedures Applicable for Approval of Settlement Agreements in Workers' Compensation. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: This rule remains necessary in order to govern the procedural requirements for Commission approval of settlement or commutation agreements. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christopher Hill by phone at 801-530-6113, by FAX at 801-530-6390, or by Internet E-mail at chill@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 08/01/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43125.htm NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES No. 43099 (5-year Review): R657-19. Taking Nongame Mammals. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The Division of Wildlife Resources has carefully reviewed the biological data and purposes for which the Wildlife Board allows the taking of species listed in this rule and has determined that such species may be taken without harming the resource, while allowing recreational opportunities and depredation control on private lands. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/19/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43099.htm No. 43100 (5-year Review): R657-57. Division Variance Rule. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Rule R657-57 provides the authority, standards and procedures for granting remedial relief to persons precluded from obtaining or using a wildlife document because of an event or condition beyond their control. This rule is necessary for continued success with the remedial relief to those impacted by an event or condition beyond their control. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/19/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43100.htm No. 43101 (5-year Review): R657-59. Private Fish Ponds, Short Term Fishing Events, Private Fish Stocking, and Institutional Aquaculture. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Rule R657-59 provides the standards and procedures for private fish ponds. This rule is necessary for continued success with the control of aquaculture facilities and products in the state. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/19/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43101.htm No. 43098 (5-year Review): R657-60. Aquatic Invasive Species Interdiction. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: Rule R657-60 defines the procedures and regulations designed to prevent and control the spread of aquatic invasive species within the state of Utah. This rule is necessary for continued success with the control of aquatic invasive species. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/19/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43098.htm No. 43097 (5-year Review): R657-65. Urban Deer Control. REASONED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE RULE, INCLUDING REASONS WHY THE AGENCY DISAGREES WITH COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE RULE, IF ANY: The purpose of this rule is to allow DWR and participating cities flexibility with removing urban deer with lethal or non-lethal methods. Therefore, this rule should be continued. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Staci Coons by phone at 801-538-4718, by FAX at 801-538-4709, or by Internet E-mail at stacicoons@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/19/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43097.htm NOTICES OF FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSIONS Rulewriting agencies are required by law to review each of their administrative rules within five years of the date of the rule's original enactment or the date of last review (Section 63G-3-305). If the agency finds that it will not meet the deadline for review of the rule (the five-year anniversary date), it may file a Notice of Five-Year Review Extension (Extension) with the Office of Administrative Rules. The Extension permits the agency to file the review up to 120 days beyond the anniversary date. Agencies have filed Extensions for the rules listed below. The "Extended Due Date" is 120 days after the anniversary date. Extensions are governed by Subsection 63G-3-305(6). TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE No. 43124 (Five-Year Extension): R918-4. Using Volunteer Groups and Third Party Contractors for the Adopt-a-Highway and Sponsor-a-Highway Litter Pickup Programs. EXTENSION REASON: The Department of Transportation needs additional time to complete its review to determine if this rule is still needed. The new deadline is 11/29/2018. DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: - Christine Newman by phone at 801-965-4026, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by Internet E-mail at cwnewman@utah.gov - Eileen McCown by phone at 801-965-4030, or by Internet E-mail at emccown@utah.gov - James Palmer by phone at 801-965-4000, by FAX at 801-965-4338, or by Internet E-mail at jimpalmer@utah.gov - Linda Hull by phone at 801-965-4253, or by Internet E-mail at lhull@utah.gov EFFECTIVE: 07/31/2018 FOR THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT, VISIT: https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bulletin/2018/20180815/43124.htm NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES State law provides for agencies to make their administrative rules effective and enforceable after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law permits an agency to make a rule effective no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period, nor more than 120 days after the publication date. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment period, the law permits an agency to make a rule effective on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the rule's publication date, but not more than 120 days after the publication date. If an agency fails to file a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses. Agencies have notified the Office of Administrative Rules that the rules listed below have been made effective. Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301(12), Section 63G-3-303, and Sections R15-4-5a and R15-4-5b. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PURCHASING AND GENERAL SERVICES No. 42932 (AMD): R33-7.Request for Proposals Published: 06/15/2018 Effective: 07/26/2018 HEALTH CHILD CARE CENTER LICENSING COMMITTEE No. 42727 (AMD): R381-60.Hourly Child Care Centers Published: 04/15/2018 Effective: 08/10/2018 No. 42726 (AMD): R381-70.Out of School Time Child Care Programs Published: 04/15/2018 Effective: 08/10/2018 No. 42725 (AMD): R381-100.Child Care Centers Published: 04/15/2018 Effective: 08/10/2018 HEALTH CARE FINANCING, COVERAGE AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY No. 42936 (AMD): R414-61-2.Incorporation by Reference Published: 06/15/2018 Effective: 07/27/2018 No. 42941 (R&R): R414-510.Intermediate Care Facility for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities Transition Program Published: 06/15/2018 Effective: 07/27/2018 FAMILY HEALTH AND PREPAREDNESS, CHILD CARE LICENSING No. 42745 (R&R): R430-8.Exemptions From Child Care Licensing Published: 04/15/2018 Effective: 08/10/2018 No. 42734 (AMD): R430-50.Residential Certificate Child Care Published: 04/15/2018 Effective: 08/10/2018 No. 42733 (AMD): R430-90.Licensed Family Child Care Published: 04/15/2018 Effective: 08/10/2018 HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION No. 42630 (CPR): R495-885.Employee Background Screenings Published: 06/01/2018 Effective: 07/18/2018 No. 42630 (AMD): R495-885.Employee Background Screenings Published: 03/15/2018 Effective: 07/18/2018 INSURANCE TITLE AND ESCROW COMMISSION No. 42711 (R&R): R592-7.Title Insurance Continuing Education Program Published: 04/15/2018 Effective: 07/30/2018 NATURAL RESOURCES FORESTRY, FIRE AND STATE LANDS No. 42928 (NEW): R652-123.Wildland Fire Suppression Cost Recovery Procedure Published: 06/15/2018 Effective: 07/23/2018 WORKFORCE SERVICES EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT No. 42927 (AMD): R986-100.Employment Support Programs Published: 06/15/2018 Effective: 07/23/2018 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT No. 42939 (NEW): R990-102.Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Restricted Account Published: 06/15/2018 Effective: 07/23/2018 RULES INDEX The Rules Index is a cumulative index that reflects all administrative rulemaking actions made effective since January 1. The Rules Index is not included Digest. However, a copy of the current Rules Index is available https://rules.utah.gov/researching/ . <> ----------------------------