File No. 34553

This rule was published in the May 1, 2011, issue (Vol. 2011, No. 9) of the Utah State Bulletin.


Environmental Quality, Drinking Water

Section R309-705-6

Applicant Priority System and Selection of Terms of Assistance

Notice of Proposed Rule

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 34553
Filed: 04/04/2011 03:20:08 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

The purpose of this change is to revise the point system in Table 2 in Section R309-705-6, which is used to calculate interest rates for loans under the federal revolving loan program administered by the Division of Drinking Water, to be more compatible with the goals of the Drinking Water Board.

Summary of the rule or change:

This rule defines the federal Drinking Water Revolving Loan Program as administered by the Division of Drinking Water including; definitions, eligible applicants, eligible projects, funding options, interest rate calculations, project priority calculations, etc.

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

  • Title 73, Chapter 10c
  • 42 USC 300j et seq.

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

Information used to calculate interest rates is already included in the funding application. The amended rule simply reallocates the points to be more compatible with the objectives of the Drinking Water Board. No additional staff time and no additional costs or savings are anticipated.

local governments:

None anticipated, data collection is already part of the application process.

small businesses:

None anticipated, data collection is already part of the application process.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

None anticipated, data collection is already part of the application process.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

None anticipated, data collection is already part of the application process.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

The Department of Environmental Quality agrees with the comments in the cost and compliance summaries above.

Amanda Smith, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Environmental Quality
Drinking Water
195 N 1950 W
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

  • Kenneth Wilde at the above address, by phone at 801-536-0048, by FAX at 801-536-4211, or by Internet E-mail at kwilde@utah.gov

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

05/31/2011

This rule may become effective on:

07/01/2011

Authorized by:

Ken Bousfield, Director

RULE TEXT

R309. Environmental Quality, Drinking Water.

R309-705. Financial Assistance: Federal Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program.

R309-705-6. Applicant Priority System and Selection of Terms of Assistance.

(1) Priority Determination.

The Board may, at its option, modify a project's priority rating based on the following considerations:

(a) The project plans, specifications, contract, financing, etc., of a lesser-rated project are ready for execution.

(b) Available funding.

(c) Acute health risk.

(d) Capacity Development (financial, technical, or managerial issues needing resolution to avoid EPA intervention).

(e) An Emergency.

The Board will utilize Table 1 to prioritize loan applicants as may be modified by (a), (b), (c), or (d) above.

 

TABLE 1

Priority System

Deficiency Description                                   Points
                                                       Received
                    Source Quality/Quantity
Health Risk (select one)
A.  There is evidence that waterborne illnesses have
    occurred.                                                 25
B.  There are reports of illnesses which may be waterborne.   20
C.  High potential for waterborne illness exists.             15
D.  Moderate potential for waterborne illness                  8
E.  No evidence of potential health risks                      0

Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)
A.  Source has been determined to be under the influence of
    surface water.                                            25
B.  System is often out of water due to inadequate source
    capacity.                                                 20
-or-
    System capacity does not meet the requirements of UPDWR.  10
C.  Source has a history of three or more confirmed
    microbiological violations within the last year.          10
D.  Sources are not developed or protected according          10
    to UPDWR.
E.  Source has confirmed MCL chemistry violations within
    the last year.                                            10

                                                  Total      100

                          Treatment
                                                           Points
Deficiency Description                                  Available
Health Risk/Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)
A.  Treatment system cannot consistently meet log removal
    requirements, turbidity standards, or other
    enforceable drinking water quality standards.             25
B.  The required disinfection facilities are not
    installed, are inadequate, or fail to provide adequate
    water quality.                                            25
C.  Treatment system is subject to impending failure,         25
    or has failed.
-or-
    Treatment system equipment does not meet demands          20
    of UPDWR including the lead and/or copper action levels.
-or-
    System equipment is projected to become inadequate         5
    without upgrades.
                                                     Total    75

                           Storage
                                                         Points
Deficiency Description                                 Available
Health Risk / Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)
A.  Storage system is subject to impending failure, or has    25
    failed.
-or-
    System is old, cannot be easily cleaned, or subject       15
    to contamination.
B.  Storage system is inadequate for existing demands.        20
-or-
    Storage system demand exceeds 90% of storage capacity.    10
C.  Applicable contact time requirements cannot be met
    without an upgrade.                                       15
D.  System suffers from low static pressures.                 15

                                                    Total     75

                         Distribution
                                                           Points
Deficiency Description                                  Available
Health Risk/Compliance with SDWA (select all that apply)
A.  Distribution system equipment is deteriorated or          20
    inadequate for existing demands.
-or-
    Distribution system is inadequate to meet 5 year          10
   projected demands.
B.  Applicable disinfectant residual maintenance              20
    requirements are not met or high backflow contamination
    potential exists.
C.  Project will replace pipe containing unsafe materials     15
    (lead, asbestos, etc).
D.  Minimum dynamic pressure requirements are not met.        10
E.  System experiences a heavy leak rate in the               10
    distribution lines.

                                                       Total  75

                         Emergencies

Upon the Board finding of an emergency as required by
R309-705-9.                                            Total 100

Priority Rating = (Average Points Received) x (Rate Factor) x (AGI Factor)

Where:
*    Rate Factor = (Average System Water Bill/Average State
Water Bill)
**   AGI Factor = (State Median AGI/System Median AGI)

 

(2) Financial Assistance Determination. The amount and type of financial assistance offered will be based upon the criteria shown in Table 2. As determined by Board resolution, disadvantaged communities may also receive zero-percent loans, or other financial assistance as described herein.

Effective rate calculation methods will be determined by Board resolution from time to time, using the Revenue Bond Buyer Index (RBBI)as a basis point, the points assigned in Table 2, and a method to reduce the interest rate from a recent RBBI rate down to a potential minimum of zero percent. To encourage rapid repayment of a loan the Board will increase the interest rate 0.02 per cent (0.02%) for each year the repayment period exceeds five (5.0) years.

 

TABLE 2
INTEREST, HARDSHIP GRANT FEE AND OTHER FEES REDUCTION FACTORS


                                                  POINTS
1. COST EFFECTIVENESS RATIO (SELECT ONE)
A. Project cost $0 to $500 per benefitting
   connection                                      [13]16
B. $501 to $1,500                                  [11]14
C. $1,501 to $2,000                                 [9]11
D. $2,001 to $3,000                                 [6]8
E. $3,001 to $5,000                                 [3]4
F. $5,001 to $10,000                                 1
G. Over $10,000                                      0


2. CURRENT LOCAL MEDIAN ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME (AGI) (SELECT ONE)

A. Less than 70% of State Median AGI                [16]19
B. 71 to 80% of State Median AGI                    [14]16
C. 81 to 95% of State Median AGI                    [12]13
D. 96 to 110% of State Median AGI                    9
E. 111 to 130% of State Median AGI                   6
F. 131 to 150% of State Median AGI                   3
G. Greater than 150% of State Median AGI             0

3. APPLICANT'S COMMITMENT TO PROJECT
PROJECT FUNDING CONTRIBUTED BY APPLICANT (SELECT ONE)

A. Greater than 25% of project funds                [15]17
B. 15 to 25% of project funds                       [12]14
C. 10 to 15% of project funds                        [9]11
D. 5 to [9]10% of project funds                    [6]8
E. 2 to [4]5% of project funds                     [3]4
F. Less than 2% of project funds                     0

4[ and 5]. ABILITY TO REPAY LOAN:

4. WATER BILL (INCLUDING TAXES) AFTER PROJECT IS
    BUILT RELATIVE TO LOCAL MEDIAN ADJUSTED GROSS
    INCOME (SELECT ONE)

A. Greater than 2.50% of local median AGI           [15]16
B. 2.01 to 2.50% of local median AGI                [11]12
C. 1.51 to 2.00% of local median AGI                 [7]8
D. 1.01 to 1.50% of local median AGI                 3
E. 0 to 1.00% of local median AGI                    0

[5. TOTAL DEBT LOAD (PRINCIPAL ONLY) OF APPLICANT AFTER
PROJECT IS CONSTRUCTED (INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER DEBT,
LIGHTING DEBT, SCHOOL DEBT, ETC.) (SELECT ONE)

A. Greater than 12% of fair market value            15
B. 8.1 to 12% of fair market value                  12
C. 4.1 to 8.0% of fair market value                  9
D. 2.1 to 4.0% of fair market value                  6
E. 1.0 to 2.0% of fair market value                  3
F. Less than 1% of fair market value                 0

6
]5.  SPECIAL INCENTIVES:  Applicant  (SELECT ALL THAT APPLY.)
A. [h]Has a replacement fund receiving annual deposits
   of about 5% of the system's annual drinking water
   (DW) budget[,] and fund has already accumulated a
   minimum of 10[25]% of said annual DW budget in 
   this reserve fund.                                       5
B. Has, in addition to item 5.A., accumulated an
   amount equal to at least 20% of its annual DW
   budget in its replacement fund.                          5
[B.]C. [i]Is creating or enhancing a regionalization plan     16
[C.]D. [h]Has a rate structure encouraging conservation     [5]6

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS FOR FINANCIAL NEED   100

 

KEY: SDWA, financial assistance, loans

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [January 28, 2009]2011

Notice of Continuation: March 23, 2010

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-4-104; 73-10c

 


Additional Information

The Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Bulletin is the official version. The PDF version of this issue is available at https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull-pdf/2011/b20110501.pdf. The HTML edition of the Bulletin is a convenience copy. Any discrepancy between the PDF version and HTML version is resolved in favor of the PDF version.

Text to be deleted is struck through and surrounded by brackets (e.g., [example]). Text to be added is underlined (e.g., example).  Older browsers may not depict some or any of these attributes on the screen or when the document is printed.

For questions regarding the content or application of this rule, please contact Kenneth Wilde at the above address, by phone at 801-536-0048, by FAX at 801-536-4211, or by Internet E-mail at kwilde@utah.gov.