Environmental Quality, Solid and Hazardous Waste

Section R315-2-14

Violations, Orders, and Hearings

Notice of Proposed Rule

(Amendment)

DAR File No.: 34701
Filed: 04/14/2011 04:33:46 PM

RULE ANALYSIS

Purpose of the rule or reason for the change:

See the companion rulemaking proposing new administrative procedures rule at Rule R305-6 (DAR No. 34472), published in the March 15, 2011, Bulletin on pg. 53. The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is updating its rule governing administrative procedures, and it is simultaneously consolidating those procedures into one rule. This amendment is being proposed because the proceedings will be handled under the new rule.

Summary of the rule or change:

DEQ is proposing to consolidate rules governing administrative proceedings currently found in several places in DEQ's rules. This provision is proposed for amendment in conformance with that effort. Note that, although this rule did not say so explicitly, Rule R315-12 would have applied to these proceedings.

State statutory or constitutional authorization for this rule:

• Section 19-6-105
• Section 19-1-301
• Section 63G-4-503
• Sections 63G-4-201 through 63G-4-205
• Section 19-6-106

Anticipated cost or savings to:

the state budget:

The changes to administrative proceedings from those currently being used are not expected to be substantial enough to have an impact on the budget of any participant. Although some changes have been proposed to improve efficiency, e.g., new requirements regarding discovery in Section R305-6-209, it is also anticipated that efficiencies will be offset by a steadily increasing caseload.

local governments:

There is no direct impact on local government, except that they may be regulated entities that would be governed by the rule. The changes to administrative proceedings from those currently being used are not expected to be substantial enough to have an impact on the budget of any participant. Although some changes have been proposed to improve efficiency, e.g., new requirements regarding discovery in Section R305-6-209, it would be speculative to suggest that the impact of any improvement would be measurable savings. It is also anticipated that efficiencies will be offset by a steadily increasing caseload.

small businesses:

The changes to administrative proceedings from those currently being used are not expected to be substantial enough to have an impact on the budget of any participant. Although some changes have been proposed to improve efficiency, e.g., new requirements regarding discovery in Section R305-6-209, it would be speculative to suggest that the impact of any improvement would be measurable savings for any specific proceeding.

persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities:

Individuals, partnerships, and other entities can be regulated entities that will be governed by the new Rule R305-6. The changes to administrative proceedings from those currently being used are not expected to be substantial enough to have an impact on the budget of any participant. Although some changes have been proposed to improve efficiency, e.g., new requirements regarding discovery in Section R305-6-209, it would be speculative to suggest that the impact of any improvement would be measurable savings for any specific proceeding.

Compliance costs for affected persons:

The changes to administrative proceedings from those currently being used are not expected to be substantial enough to have an impact on the budget of any participant. Although some changes have been proposed to improve efficiency, e.g., new requirements regarding discovery in Section R305-6-209, it would be speculative to suggest that the impact of any improvement would be measurable savings for any specific proceeding.

Comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses:

The changes to administrative proceedings from those currently being used are not expected to be substantial enough to have an impact on the budget of any participant. Although some changes have been proposed to improve efficiency, e.g., new requirements regarding discovery in Section R305-6-209, it would be speculative to suggest that the impact of any improvement would be measurable savings for any specific proceeding.

Amanda Smith, Executive Director

The full text of this rule may be inspected, during regular business hours, at the Division of Administrative Rules, or at:

Environmental Quality
Solid and Hazardous Waste
195 N 1950 W
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3097

Direct questions regarding this rule to:

• Laura Lockhart at the above address, by phone at 801-366-0283, by FAX at 801-366-0292, or by Internet E-mail at [email protected]

Interested persons may present their views on this rule by submitting written comments to the address above no later than 5:00 p.m. on:

05/31/2011

This rule may become effective on:

07/01/2011

Authorized by:

Amanda Smith, Executive Director

R315. Environmental Quality, Solid and Hazardous Waste.

R315-2. General Requirements - Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste.

[ R315-2-14. Violations, Orders, and Hearings.

(a) Whenever the Board or its duly appointed representative, as expressly delegated by the Board, determines that any person is in violation of any applicable approved hazardous waste operation plan or the requirements of R315-1 through R315-101, the Board or its duly appointed representative may cause written notice of that violation to be served upon the alleged violators. That notice shall specify the provisions of the plan, the rules alleged to have been violated, and the facts alleged to constitute the violation. The Board or its duly appointed representative may issue an order that necessary corrective action be taken within a reasonable time or may request the attorney general or the county attorney in the county in which the violation takes place to bring a civil action for injunctive relief and enforcement of R315-1 through R315-101.

(b) Any order issued pursuant to 19-6-112 and R315-2-14(a) shall become final unless, within 30 days after the order is served, the persons specified therein request a hearing. The request shall:

(1) be in writing;

(2) be addressed to the Executive Secretary;

(3) include the order number;

(4) state the facts;

(5) state the relief sought; and

(6) state the reasons the relief requested should be granted.

(c) Utah Administrative Procedures Act, 63G-4, and R315-12, shall govern the conduct of hearings before the Board.

]

KEY: hazardous wastes, administrative procedures

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [January 15, 2010]2011

Notice of Continuation: August 24, 2006

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-1-301; 19-6-105; 19-6-106; 63G-4-201 through 205; 63G-4-503